<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<sec><h3>Objective</h3>
<p>This study is aimed to develop student simulated patient (SSP) training content and evaluation indicators, and further explores their validity and reliabilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><h3>Methods</h3>
<p>Delphi consultations with 20 nursing experts were conducted. The weights of indicators were calculated through the analytic hierarchy process. SSP training was conducted with a high-fidelity nursing simulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><h3>Results</h3>
<p>The expert positive coefficients were 0.952 in the first round consultation and 1.00 in the second round consultation. The expert authority coefficient was reported as 0.87. The training included role and responsibility of simulated patient (SP), script interpretation, plot performance, and training for a rater, with a total of 17 indicators. SSP evaluation consisted of disease knowledge, role portrayal, and performance fidelity and since being a rater, it consists of 20 indicators in total. The coordination coefficients of two rounds of consultation ranged from 0.530 to 0.918. The content validity of SSP evaluation indicators was 0.95. The inter-rater reliability was reported as 0.866, and the internal consistency established using Cronbach’s <underline>α</underline> was 0.727.</p>
</sec>
<sec><h3>Conclusions</h3>
<p>Students as SPs should have first-hand knowledge and experience within the simulated scenarios. SSP training content and evaluation indicators were determined through the Delphi consensus combined with analytic hierarchy process. The evaluation indicators were valid and reliable, and provided the objective and quantifiable measurements for SSP training in nursing.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>

Objective
This study is aimed to develop student simulated patient (SSP) training content and evaluation indicators, and further explores their validity and reliabilities.

Methods
Delphi consultations with 20 nursing experts were conducted. The weights of indicators were calculated through the analytic hierarchy process. SSP training was conducted with a high-fidelity nursing simulation.

Results
The expert positive coefficients were 0.952 in the first round consultation and 1.00 in the second round consultation. The expert authority coefficient was reported as 0.87. The training included role and responsibility of simulated patient (SP), script interpretation, plot performance, and training for a rater, with a total of 17 indicators. SSP evaluation consisted of disease knowledge, role portrayal, and performance fidelity and since being a rater, it consists of 20 indicators in total. The coordination coefficients of two rounds of consultation ranged from 0.530 to 0.918. The content validity of SSP evaluation indicators was 0.95. The inter-rater reliability was reported as 0.866, and the internal consistency established using Cronbach’s α was 0.727.

Conclusions
Students as SPs should have first-hand knowledge and experience within the simulated scenarios. SSP training content and evaluation indicators were determined through the Delphi consensus combined with analytic hierarchy process. The evaluation indicators were valid and reliable, and provided the objective and quantifiable measurements for SSP training in nursing.

Development of student simulated patient training and evaluation indicators in a high-fidelity nursing simulation: a Delphi consensus study<xref ref-type="fn" rid="j_fon-2021-0003_fn_001"><sup>†</sup></xref>

Frontiers of Nursing

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Development of student simulated patient training and evaluation indicators in a high-fidelity nursing simulation: a Delphi consensus study

Objective
This study is aimed to develop student simulated patient (SSP) training content and evaluation indicators, and further explores their validity and...

Development of student simulated patient training and evaluation indicators in a high-fidelity nursing simulation: a Delphi consensus study^†

Article Category: Original article

Published Online: Apr 30, 2021

Page range: 23 - 31

Received: Jun 08, 2020

Accepted: Jul 21, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2021-0003

Keywords
student simulated patient, high-fidelity simulation, Delphi method, nursing, training

© 2021 Hao-Bin Yuan, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Development of student simulated patient training and evaluation indicators in a high-fidelity nursing simulation: a Delphi consensus study†

Article Category: Original article

Published Online: Apr 30, 2021

Page range: 23 - 31

Received: Jun 08, 2020

Accepted: Jul 21, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2021-0003

Keywordsstudent simulated patient, high-fidelity simulation, Delphi method, nursing, training

© 2021 Hao-Bin Yuan, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Development of student simulated patient training and evaluation indicators in a high-fidelity nursing simulation: a Delphi consensus study^†

Keywords
student simulated patient, high-fidelity simulation, Delphi method, nursing, training