Open Access

The Quality of Interpersonal Relationships at Work. A Comparison of the Private and Public Sector in Poland

   | Jan 29, 2021

Cite

Atrek, B., Marcone, M.R., Gregori, G.L., Temperini, V., Moscatelli, L. (2014). Relationship Quality in Supply Chain Management: A Dyad Perspective. Ege Academic Review, 14 (3), 371–381.10.21121/eab.2014318024Search in Google Scholar

Baarspul, H.C., Wilderom, C.P.M. (2012). Do employees behave differently in public- vs. private-sector organizations? Public Management Review, 13 (7), 967–1002.Search in Google Scholar

Balchin, J., Wooden, M. (1995). Absence penalties and the work attendance. Australian Economic Review, 28 (4), 43–58.10.1111/j.1467-8462.1995.tb00903.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bellante, D., Link, A. (1981). Are public sector workers more risk averse than private sector workers? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34 (3), 408–412.10.1177/001979398103400307Search in Google Scholar

Buelens, M., Van Den Broeck, H. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67 (1), 65–74.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00697.xSearch in Google Scholar

Burned, B., Pope, R. (2007). Negative behaviours in the workplace: A study of two Primary Care Trusts in the NHS. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20 (4), 285–303.10.1108/09513550710750011Search in Google Scholar

Carmeli, A. (2009). Positive Work Relationships, Vitality, and Job Performance. In N. Ashkanasy, W.J. Zerbe, C.E.J. Härtel (eds.), Research on Emotions in Organizations: The Effect of Affect in Organizational Settings. UK: Emerald Group.Search in Google Scholar

Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., Dutton, J.E. (2009). Learning Behaviours in the Workplace: The Role of High-quality Interpersonal Relationships and Psychological Safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 81–98.10.1002/sres.932Search in Google Scholar

Carmeli, A., Gittel, J.H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 709–739.10.1002/job.565Search in Google Scholar

Glińska-Neweś, A., Szostek, D. (2018). Organizational citizenship behaviors in public and private sector. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 17 (1), 45–58.Search in Google Scholar

Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165–184.10.1080/13594329608414853Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, S.T., Duxbury, L.E., Higgins, C.A. (2006). A Comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 6 (4), 605–618.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00620.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nasir, M., Bashir, A. (2012). Examining workplace deviance in public sector organizations of Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 39 (4), 2014–253.10.1108/03068291211205677Search in Google Scholar

Szostek, D. (2018). Counterproductive work behavior. Comparison of the public and private sector. Journal of Positive Management, 9 (1), 3–17.Search in Google Scholar

Szostek, D. (2019). Kontrproduktywne zachowania organizacyjne w kontekście jakości relacji interpersonalnych w zespołach pracowniczych. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK.Search in Google Scholar

Szostek, D., Glińska-Neweś, A. (2017). Identyfikacja wymiarów jakości relacji interpersonal-nych w organizacji. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 3, 11–24.Search in Google Scholar

Vandenheuvel, A. (1994). Public and private sector absence: does it differ? Journal of Industrial Relations, 36 (4), 530–545.10.1177/002218569403600405Search in Google Scholar

“Rzeczpospolita”, Lista 500 – Edycja 2016, https://sklep.rp.pl/produkt/lista_500__edycja_2015.php.Search in Google Scholar

“Wprost”, Ranking 200 Największych Polskich Firm 2017, http://rankingi.wprost.pl/200-najwiekszych-firm#pelna-lista.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1898-0198
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Business and Economics, Political Economics, other