[
Adokorach, Monica, Bebwa Isingoma (2020). Homogeneity and heterogeneity in the pronunciation of English among Ugandans. English Today 148, 18(1): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078420000152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amarorwot, Sarah, Bebwa Isingoma (2021). Structural nativization of English in Uganda: Evidence from number agreement and interrogatives among Acholi speakers of English. Journal of Studies in the English Language 16(2): 52–82. https://doi.org/10.46687/yxuv9786.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Atechi, Samuel N. (2004). The intelligibility of native and non-native English Speech: A comparative analysis of Cameroon and American and British English. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berowa, Annie Mae C., Shirley N. Dita (2021). Illustrating the suprasegmental features of Philippine English phonology: A mother tongue-based approach. The Asian ESP Journal 17 (4.3): 89–111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blevins, James P., Juliette Blevins (2009). Introduction. In Blevins, James P., Julliette Blevins, eds. Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.001.0001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boersma, Paul, David Weenink (2006). Praat. Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.2.23), https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/. (Accessed January 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Ghada Khattab (2013). Population samples. In Podesva J. Robert, Devyani Sharma, eds. Research Methods in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139013734.006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buregeya, Alfred (2006). Grammatical features of Kenyan English and the extent of their acceptability. English World-Wide 27(2): 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.27.2.05bur.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Beverley, Inger M. Mees (2013). Practical Phonetics & Phonology: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203080023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edmunds, Paul (2009). ESL speakers’ production of English lexical stress: The effect of variation in acoustic correlates on perceived intelligibility and nativeness. PhD thesis: University of New Mexico. Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/10 (Accessed May 20, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fisher, Allestree E. C. (2000). Assessing the state of Ugandan English. English Today 16: 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078400011470.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenbaum, Sidney, Gerald Nelson (1996). The International Corpus of English (ICE) Project. World Englishes 15: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1996.tb00088.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gut, Urlike (2013). Analysing phonetic and phonological variation on the supraseg-mental level. In Krug Manfred, Julia Schlüter, eds. Research Methods in Language Variation and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511792519.017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hung, Tony T. N. (2000). Towards a phonology of Hong Kong English. World Englishes 19(3): 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971x.00183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isingoma, Bebwa (2013). Innovative pragmatic codes in Ugandan English: A relevance-theoretic account. Argumentum 9: 19–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isingoma, Bebwa (2018). Accounting for variability in the linearization of ditransitive constructions in English among native speakers. Argumentum 14: 383–399.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isingoma, Bebwa (2021). Politeness strategies in Ugandan English: Making requests and responding to thanks. Brno Studies in English 47(1): 7–29. https://doi.org/10.5817/bse2021-1-2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isingoma, Bebwa, Christiane Meierkord (2016). Ugandan English –challenges to, and food for, current theories. In Meierkord, Christiane, Bebwa Isingoma, Saudah Namyalo, eds. Ugandan English: Its Sociolinguistics, Structure and Uses in a Globalizing Post-Protectorate. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g59.01isi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isingoma, Bebwa, Christiane Meierkord (2022). Between exonormative traditions and local acceptance: A corpus-linguistic study of modals of obligation and spatial prepositions in spoken Ugandan English. Open Linguistics 8: 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ježek, Miroslav (2012). The double-edged sword of RP: The contrasting roles of a pronunciation model in both native and non-native environments. Research in Language 10(2): 133–142. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0037-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jubilado, Rodney C. (2016). Where is the CR? A description of Philippine English in Hawaii. Philippine ESL Journal 1: 86–101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaji, Shigeki (2009). Tone and syntax in Rutooro, a toneless Bantu language of Western Uganda. Language Sciences 31(2-3): 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Katamba, Francis (1989). An Introduction to Phonology. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kawalya, Deo, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver, Koen Bostoen (2018). From conditionality to modality in Luganda (Bantu, JE 15): A synchronic and diachronic corpus analysis of the verbal prefix -andi-. Journal of Pragmatics 127: 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lomotey, Charlotte F. (2018). Fluidity and variation in lexical stress placement in Ghanaian English discourse: A case of systematicity in communication in world Englishes. The Journal of English as an International Language 13(1): 37–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meierkord, Christiane (2012). Interactions across Englishes: Linguistic choices in Local and International Contact Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139026703.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meierkord, Christiane (2016). Diphthongs in Ugandan English: Evidence for and against variety status and interactions across Englishes. In Meierkord Christiane, Bebwa Isingoma, Saudah Namyalo, eds. Ugandan English: Its Sociolinguistics, Structure and Uses in a Globalizing Post-protectorate. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g59.06mei.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meierkord, Christiane, Bebwa Isingoma (2022). Between first language influence, exonormative orientation and migration: Future time expressions in post-protectorate Ugandan English. English World-Wide 43(2): 220–248. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.21014.mei.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Namyalo, Saudah, Bebwa Isingoma, Christiane Meierkord (2016) Towards assessing the space of English in Uganda’s linguistic ecology. In Meierkord Christiane, Bebwa Isingoma, Saudah Namyalo, eds. Ugandan English: Its Sociolinguistics, Structure and Uses in a Globalizing Post-protectorate. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 19–50. https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g59.02nam.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nassenstein, Nico (2016). A preliminary description of Ugandan English, World Englishes. 35(3): 396–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ndoleriire, Oswald, Celestin Oriikiriza (1996). Runyakitara language. Course manual. (ms). Makerere University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noonan, Michael (1992). A Grammar of Lango. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110850512.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. London. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/. (Accessed April 30, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oxford English Dictionary (OED). http://www.oed.com/ (Accessed April 15, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oyaro, Jennifer (2020). A description of some phonetic and phonological aspects of the Acholi language. MA dissertation. Kampala: Makerere University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roach, Peter (2005). English Phonetics and Phonology: A practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roach, Peter (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology: A practical Course. Fourth Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schleef, Erik, Miriam Meyerhoff (2010). Sociolinguistic methods for data collection and interpretation. In Meyerhoff Miriam, Erik Schleef, eds. The Routledge Sociolinguistics Reader. London/New York: Routledge, 1–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, W. Edgar (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511618901.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schröder, Anne, Frederic Zähres, Alexander Kautzsch (2021). The phonetics of Namibian English: Investigating vowels as local features in a global context. In Schröder, Anne, ed. The Dynamics of English in Namibia: Perspectives on an emerging variety. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g65.06sch.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simo Bobda, Augustin (1994). Aspects of Cameroon English Phonology. Peter Lang, Inc.; European Academic Publishers: Bern.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simo Bobda, Augustin (2001). East and Southern African English accents. World Englishes 20(3): 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971x.00215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Styler, Will (2022). Using Praat for linguistic research. Available at http://savethevowels.org/praat. (Accessed June 26, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiffen, Brian W. (1974). The intelligibility of Nigerian English. PhD thesis, University of London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (2016). The National Population and Housing Census 2014- Main Report, Kampala Uganda.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Upton, Clive (2004). Received pronunciation. In Schneider, Edgar W., Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie, Clive Upton, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110175325.1.217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wells, John C. (1982). Accents of English: An Introduction. Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
