Open Access

Telecollaboration: Fostering Foreign Language Learning at a Distance

   | Jan 24, 2020

Cite

1. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890 Search in Google Scholar

2. Angelova, M., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills, cross-cultural awareness and language skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 167-185.10.1080/09588221.2014.907320 Search in Google Scholar

3. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Search in Google Scholar

4. Belz, J. A. (2006). At the intersection of telecollaboration, learner corpus analysis, and L2 pragmatics: Considerations for language program direction. Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education, 207-246. Search in Google Scholar

5. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning (Vol. 3). Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

6. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Search in Google Scholar

7. Chen, J. J., & Yang, S. C. (2016). Promoting cross-cultural understanding and language use in research-oriented internet-mediated intercultural exchange. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 262-288.10.1080/09588221.2014.937441 Search in Google Scholar

8. Chun, D. M. (2011). Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 392.10.11139/cj.28.2.392-419 Search in Google Scholar

9. Çiftçi, E. Y., & Savaş, P. (2018). The role of telecollaboration in language and intercultural learning: A synthesis of studies published between 2010 and 2015. ReCALL, 30(3), 278-298.10.1017/S0958344017000313 Search in Google Scholar

10. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath. Search in Google Scholar

11. Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and education: The 60th anniversary edition. Kappa Delta Pi. Search in Google Scholar

12. Gómez, M. V. G. (2019). Developing Soft Skills in Higher Education Foreign Language Programs. Initial Insights into Telecollaboration. In Teaching Language and Teaching Literature in Virtual Environments (pp. 151-162). Springer, Singapore. Search in Google Scholar

13. Guth, S., & Marini-Maio, N. (2010). Close encounters of a new kind: The use of Skype and Wiki in telecollaboration. Telecollaboration, 2, 413-426. Search in Google Scholar

14. Harris, J. (2000). Taboo Topic No Longer: Why Telecollaborative Projects Sometimes Fail. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27(5), 58. Search in Google Scholar

15. Helm, F., & Guth, S. (2010). The multifarious goals of telecollaboration 2.0: Theoretical and practical implications. In F. Helm & S. Guth (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Language Literacies and Intercultural Learning in the 21st Century (pp.69-106). Search in Google Scholar

16. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37. Search in Google Scholar

17. Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(3), 281-297.10.1017/S0958344014000111 Search in Google Scholar

18. Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2004). A Task-Cycling Pedagogy Using Stimulated Reflection and Audio-Conferencing in Foreign Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 50-68. Search in Google Scholar

19. Liaw, M. L., & Bunn-Le Master, S. (2010). Understanding telecollaboration through an analysis of intercultural discourse. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 21-40.10.1080/09588220903467301 Search in Google Scholar

20. McCloskey, E. M. (2012). Global teachers: A conceptual model for building teachers’ intercultural competence Online [Docentes globales: un modelo conceptual para el desarrollo de la competencia intercultural on-line]. Comunicar, 38, 41–49.10.3916/C38-2012-02-04 Search in Google Scholar

21. Michell, H. (2011). A critical analysis of the effects of a videoconferencing project on pupils’ learning about culture and language. Journal of Trainee Teacher Education Research, 2, 51-88. Search in Google Scholar

22. O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623-642.10.1558/cj.v23i3.623-642 Search in Google Scholar

23. Piaget. J. (1970). Structuralism. New York: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar

24. Schenker, T. (2012). Intercultural competence and cultural learning through telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 449.10.11139/cj.29.3.449-470 Search in Google Scholar

25. Thorne, S. L. (2006). Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. Internet-mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education, 2-30. Search in Google Scholar

26. Vorobel, O., & Kim, D. (2012). Language teaching at a distance: An overview of research. Calico Journal, 29(3), 548.10.11139/cj.29.3.548-562 Search in Google Scholar

27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. London: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

28. Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190-205.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00274.x Search in Google Scholar

29. Ware, P. D., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43-63. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1027-5207
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Education, Curriculum and Pedagogy, other