1. bookVolume 17 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
Journal Details
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Open Access

Tpdk, a New Definition of the Tpack Model for a University Setting

Published Online: 03 Mar 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 17 (2014) - Issue 2 (December 2014)
Page range: 15 - 39
Journal Details
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

1. Amade-Escot, C. (2011). Le comparatisme en didactique. Presentation in “le cadre de l’école doctorale des didactiques”. Liège, Belgique. 2011, octobre.Search in Google Scholar

2. Archambault, L. and Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States Contemporary Issues. In Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), (pp. 71-88).Search in Google Scholar

3. Becher, T. (1981). Toward a definition of disciplinary cultures. In Studies in Higher Education, 6(2), (pp. 109-122).10.1080/03075078112331379362Search in Google Scholar

4. Becher, T. (1993). Academic Tribes and Territories. Buckingham: Society of Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

5. Becher, T. and Trowler, P.R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. (2nd ed.) SRHE/Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

6. Berthiaume, D. (2006). A description of discipline-specific pedagogical knowledge (DPK) encountered in the discourse of four university professors from four different disciplinary areas. (None published doctoral thesis). University de Mc Gill: Montréal, Québec, Canada.Search in Google Scholar

7. Berthiaume, D. (2007a). Une description empirique du savoir pédagogique disciplinaire des professeurs d’université. In Actes du colloque de l’AIPU : regards sur l’innovation la collaboration et la valorisation, (p.179-181). Montréal : Canada.Search in Google Scholar

8. Berthiaume, D. (2007b). What is the nature of university professors’ discipline-specific pedagogical knowledge? A descriptive multicase study. (thèse de l’University de Mc Gill : Montréal, Québec, Canada. ). Available online at http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/-?func=dbin-jumpfull& object_id=103191&silo_library=GEN01Search in Google Scholar

9. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. In Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), (pp. 195-203).10.1037/h0034701Search in Google Scholar

10. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Homo Academicus. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar

11. Bourgeois, E. (1990). University politics: adult Education in a Belgian University. None published doctoral thesis. University of Chicago: Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

12. Cochran, K.F.; King, R.A.; De Ruiter, J.A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowledge: an integrative model for teacher preparation. In Journal of teacher Education, 44(4), (pp. 263-272).10.1177/0022487193044004004Search in Google Scholar

13. Czaja, R. and Blair, J. (2005). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412983877Search in Google Scholar

14. Donald, J. (2002). Learning to thinking. Disciplinary Differences. San Fransisco : Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gagné, R. (1985).The conditions of learning. Holt Rinehart and Winston. New York, 4th ed.Search in Google Scholar

16. Gess-Newsome, J. and Lederman, N.G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The Construct and its implications for science education. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

17. Graham, C.R.; Borup, J. and Smith, N.B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates technology integration decisions. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, (pp. 530-546).10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00472.xSearch in Google Scholar

18. Guyot, J.L. and Bonami, M. (2000). Mode de structuration du travail professoral et logiques disciplinaires à l’université. In Cahier du GIRSEF 9, (pp. 1-65).Search in Google Scholar

19. Harris, J.; Grandgenett, N. and Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology Integration Assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, (p.3833-3840), Chesapeake, VA.Search in Google Scholar

20. Hativa, N. and Marincovich, M. (eds.) (1995). Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hiebert, J.; Gallimore, R. and Stigler, J.W. (2002). A Knowledge base for the teaching profession: what would it look like and how can we g& one? In Educational Researcher, 31(5), (pp. 3-15).Search in Google Scholar

22. Hofer, B.K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. In Educational Psychologist, XXXIX(1), (pp. 43-55).10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5Search in Google Scholar

23. Hofer, B.K. and Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The Development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. In Review of Educational Research, 67(1), (pp. 88-140).10.3102/00346543067001088Search in Google Scholar

24. Hofer, B.K. and Pintrich, P.R. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

25. Hofer, M. and Harris, J. (2010). Differentiating TPACK development: using learning activity types with inservice and preservice teachers. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, (pp. 3857-3864), Chesapeake, VA.Search in Google Scholar

26. Jacquinot-Delaunay, G. (2008). L’intégration des TICE dans l’institution universitaire : de l’infiltration à l’innovation ? In G. Delaunay & E. Fichez (eds.), L’université & les TIC. Chronique d’une innovation annoncée, (p.179-222), Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.Search in Google Scholar

27. Kanuka, H. (2006). Instructional design and e-learning: a discussion of pedagogical content knowledge as a missing construct. In The e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 9(2). Available online at http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ejist/ docs/vol9_no2/papers/full_papers/kanuka.htmSearch in Google Scholar

28. Khune, T. (1962). The structure of scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

29. Kolb, D-A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. W. Chickering (ed.), The Modern American College, (p.232-255). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

30. Lebrun, M. (1999, 2002a). Des technologies pour enseigner et apprendre. Perspectives en education et formation. (2 ème ed.). Bruxelles : De Boeck Université. Search in Google Scholar

31. Lebrun, M. (2002b, 2007a). Théories et méthodes pédagogiques pour enseigner et apprendre. Quelle place pour les TIC dans l’éducation ? Perspectives en éducation et formation. Bruxelles : De boeck Université.10.3917/dbu.lebru.2007.02Search in Google Scholar

32. Lebrun, M. (2005, 2006). E-Learning pour enseigner et pour apprendre- Allier pédagogie et technologie. Louvain-la-Neuve : Ed. Bruylant-academia.10.3917/dbu.lebru.2007.01Search in Google Scholar

33. Lebrun, M. (2007). Quality towards an expected harmony: pedagogy and technology speaking together about innovation. In AACE Journal, 15(2), (pp. 115-130).Search in Google Scholar

34. Lebrun, M. (2012). Classes inversées, Flipped Classrooms ...Ca flippe quoi au juste ? Bolg de M@rcel. Available online at http://lebrunremy.be/WordPress/?p=612Search in Google Scholar

35. Lenze, L.F. (1995). Discipline-specific pedagogical knowledge in Linguistics and Spanish. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich (eds.), Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice, (pp. 65-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

36. Lessard, C.; Altet, M.; Paquay, L. and Perrenoud, P. (2004). Entre sens commun et sciences humaines. suels savoirs pour enseigner ? Bruxelles : Deboeck.Search in Google Scholar

37. Magnusson, S.; Krajcik, J.; Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge, (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, NL : Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

38. Mishra, P. and Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. In Teachers College Record, 108(6), (pp. 1017-1054). Available online at http://mkoehler.educ.msu.edu/OtherPages/Koehler_Pubs/TECH_BY_DESIGN/TCReco rd/mishra_koehler_tcr2006.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

39. Moursund, D. and Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? Available online at http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED428072Search in Google Scholar

40. Munby, H.; Russell, T. and Martin, A.K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4e ed.), (pp. 877-904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Search in Google Scholar

41. Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. In Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), (pp. 135-146).10.1080/03075070120052071Search in Google Scholar

42. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. In Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, (pp. 509-523).10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006Search in Google Scholar

43. Puentedura, R.R. (2006). Transformation, Technology and Education [slides]. Available online at http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/part1.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

44. Rege Colet, N. and Berthiaume, D. (2009). Savoir ou être ? Savoirs et identités professionnels chez les enseignants universitaires. In R. Hofstetter & B. Schneuwly (eds.), Savoir en (trans)formation, (p.137-162). Bruxelles : De Boeck.Search in Google Scholar

45. Rege Colet, N. and Lenzo Marchese, J. (2006). Peut-on parler de spécificités disciplinaires dans l’utilisation de TIC ? Études des pratiques facultaires à l’Université. Actes du XXIIIème congrès AIPU 2006. Available online at http://www.unige.ch/formev/publications/technologies/texte-regecolet-lenzo.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

46. Sensevy, G. (2009). Didactique et sciences de l’éducation : une reconfiguration ? In A. Vergnioux (ed.), 40 ans des sciences de l’éducation, (pp. 49-58). Caen : PUC.Search in Google Scholar

47. Schmidt, D.A.; Baran, E.; Thompson, A.D.; Mishra, P.; Koehler, M. and Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. In Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), (pp. 123-149).10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544Search in Google Scholar

48. Schwab, J.J. (1964). Structure of the disciplines: meanings and significances. In G.W. Ford & L. Pugno (eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum, (pp. 6-30). Chicago. Rand Mc Nally.Search in Google Scholar

49. Segall, A. (2004). Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge: the pedagogy of content/the content of pedagogy. In Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, (pp. 489-504).10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.006Search in Google Scholar

50. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. In Educational researcher, 15(2), (pp. 4-14). In Traduit dans Education et didactique, 1(1), (pp. 97-114).10.3102/0013189X015002004Search in Google Scholar

51. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. In Harvard Educational review, 57, (pp. 1-22).10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411Search in Google Scholar

52. Shulman, L.S. (1998). Theory, Practice and Education of Professionals. In The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), (pp. 511-526).10.1086/461912Search in Google Scholar

53. Shulman, L.S. (2004). How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. In J. Curriculum studies, 36(2), (pp. 257-271).10.1080/0022027032000148298Search in Google Scholar

54. Shulman, L.S. (2007). Ceux qui comprennent : Le développement de la connaissance dans l’enseignement. In Education et Didactique, 1(1), (pp. 97-114).10.4000/educationdidactique.121Search in Google Scholar

55. van Driel, J.H.; Verloop, N.; Devos, W. (1998). Developing science teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge. In Journal of research in science Teaching, 35(6), (pp. 673-695).10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-JSearch in Google Scholar

56. Vause, A. (2009) Les croyances et connaissances des enseignants à propos de l’acte d’enseigner. In Les Cahiers de Recherche en Éducation et Formation, 66 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD