1. bookVolume 17 (2014): Issue 1 (July 2014)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Engineering College Lecturers Reluctance to Adopt Online Courses

Published Online: 11 Dec 2014
Volume & Issue: Volume 17 (2014) - Issue 1 (July 2014)
Page range: 210 - 226
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The paper investigates difficulties involved in integrating online courses in academic colleges. Despite their growing prevalence in Israel and worldwide there are still no online courses offered as part of the learning process in many colleges. In order to identify factors for this phenomenon, a study was conducted to investigate the attitudes of 137 lecturers in an academic college concerning online courses. A questionnaire was employed to examine attitudes in four areas: cognizance of the online courses, willingness to teach these courses, influence of online courses on the college’s reputation and teaching methods in online courses. The study identified four sources of reluctance among college instructors to teach in these courses: lack of knowledge concerning teaching methods, fear of a heavy work burden, concern that students’ achievements might fall and impairment of the college’s reputation. Since there is desire to integrate online courses in academic colleges, it is recommended that an online pedagogy support centre should be opened in these colleges, and that colleges should consider making it mandatory for students to take at least one compulsory online course during their degree course.

Keywords

1. Allen I.E. and Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

2. Allen I.E. and Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

3. Berge, Z.L. (1998). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: Can policy changes fix it? In Online Journal of Distance Education Administration, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/berge12.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

4. Birch, D.P. and Burnett, B.M. (2008). Interactive multimodal technology mediated distance education courses: The academic’s perspective. In Japanese Journal of Educational Media Research, 15(1), (pp. 43-60).Search in Google Scholar

5. Chapman, D. and Nicolet, T. (2003). Using the project approach to online course development. In The Technology Source, March/April 2003. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://technologysource.org/article/using_the_project_approach_to_online_course_development/Search in Google Scholar

6. Cohen, A.; Shmueli, E. and Nachmias, R. (2011). The Usage of Data Repositories: The Case MAOR. In Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Object, 7. Retrieved from: http://www.ijello.org/Volume7/IJELLOv7p323-338Cohen762.pdf10.28945/1527Search in Google Scholar

7. Dooley, K.E. (1999). Towards a holistic model for the diffusion of educational technologies: An integrative review of the educational innovation studies. In Educational Technology and Society 2(4), (pp. 35-45).Search in Google Scholar

8. Hall, G.E.; Wallace, R.C. and Dossett, W.A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Austin Research and Development Center for Teacher Education: University of Texas at Austin.Search in Google Scholar

9. Hawkes, M. and Coldeway, D.O. (2002). An analysis of team vs. faculty-based online course development, implications for instructional design. In Quarterly Review of distance Education, 3(4), (pp. 431-441).Search in Google Scholar

10. Hixon, E. (2008). Team-based online course development: A case study of collaboration models online. In Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(4). Retrieved Mach 10, 2013 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter114/hixon114.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

11. Holsombach-Ebner, C. (2013). Quality assurance in large scale online course production. In Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(2). Retrieved October 11, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter164/holsombach-ebner164.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

12. Jaggars, S.S. and Bailey, T (2010). Effectiveness of fully online courses for college students: response to a department of education meta-analysis. Community College Research Center Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512274.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

13. Jahng, N.; Krug, D. and Zhang, Z. (2007). Student achievement in the online distance education compared to face-to-face education. In European Journal of Open, Distance and ELearning, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/index.php?p=archives&year=2007&halfyear=1&article=253Search in Google Scholar

14. Kampov-Polevoi, J. (2010). Considerations for supporting faculty in transitioning a course to online format. In Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer132/kampov_polevoi132.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

15. Kop, R. (2011). The challenge to connectivist learning on open online networks: learning experience during a massive open online course. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/882/168910.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882Search in Google Scholar

16. Liu, X.; Bonk, C.J.; Magjuka, R.J.; Lee, S.; Su, B. (2005). Exploring four dimensions of online instructor roles: A program level case study. In Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(4). Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v9n4/exploring-four-dimensions-onlineinstructor-roles-program-level-case-study10.24059/olj.v9i4.1777Search in Google Scholar

17. Parthasarathy, M. and Smith, M.A. (2009). Valuing the institution: An expanded list of factors influencing faculty adoption of online education. In Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(4). Retrieved Mach 10, 2013 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer122/parthasarathy122.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

18. Phipps, R. and Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.Search in Google Scholar

19. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th Ed). Free Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar

20. Schifter, C.C. (2000). Faculty participation in Asynchronous Learning Networks: A case study of motivating and inhibiting factors. In Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(1), (pp. 15-22).Search in Google Scholar

21. Schonfeld, R.C. and Housewright, R. (2010). Faculty survey 2009: Key strategic insights for libraries, publishers, and societies. Ithaka S+R, 2010. Retrieved from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/communia2010/sites/communia2010/images/Faculty_Study_2009.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

22. Shea, P.; Pickett, A. and Pelz, W. (2003). A follow-up study of teaching presence in the online program. In Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), (pp. 61-80).Search in Google Scholar

23. Sitzmann, T.; Kraiger, K.; Stewart, D. and Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. In Personnel Psychology, 59(3), (pp. 623-664). 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.xSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo