1. bookVolume 17 (2014): Issue 1 (July 2014)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

B-learning Quality: Dimensions, Criteria and Pedagogical Approach

Published Online: 11 Dec 2014
Volume & Issue: Volume 17 (2014) - Issue 1 (July 2014)
Page range: 56 - 75
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Measuring the quality of a b-learning environment is critical to determine the success of a blearning course. Several initiatives have been recently conducted on benchmarking and quality in e-learning. Despite these efforts in defining and examining quality issues concerning online courses, a defining instrument to evaluate quality is one of the key challenges for blended learning, since it incorporates both traditional and online instruction methods. For this paper, six frameworks for quality assessment of technological enhanced learning were examined and compared regarding similarities and differences. These frameworks aim at the same global objective: the quality of e-learning environment/products. They present different perspectives but also many common issues. Some of them are more specific and related to the course and others are more global and related to institutional aspects. In this work we collected and arrange all the quality criteria identified in order to get a more complete framework and determine if it fits our b-learning environment. We also included elements related to our own b-learning research and experience, acquired during more than 10 years of experience. As a result we have create a new quality reference with a set of dimensions and criteria that should be taken into account when you are analyzing, designing, developing, implementing and evaluating a b-learning environment. Besides these perspectives on what to do when you are developing a b-learning environment we have also included pedagogical issues in order to give directions on how to do it to reach the success of the learning. The information, concepts and procedures here presented give support to teachers and instructors, which intend to validate the quality of their blended learning courses.

Keywords

1. Blakely, G.; Skirton, H.; Cooper, S.; Allum, P. and Nelmes, P. (2009). Educational gaming in the health sciences: systematic review. In Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), (pp. 259-269). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04843.x10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04843.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Bloom, B. and Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational goals by a Committee of College and University Examiners. New York: Longmans.Search in Google Scholar

3. BS-8426. (2003). BS 8426:2003 A code of practice for e-support in e-learning systems. BSI.Search in Google Scholar

4. California State University (CSU) Chico. (2003). Rubric for Online Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/roiSearch in Google Scholar

5. EADTU (2012). Quality Assessment for E-learning: a Benchmarking Approach - Second edition. European Association of Distance Teaching Universities.Search in Google Scholar

6. EFMD (2010). EFMD CEL Introductory Guide. Retrieved from http://www.efmd.org/images/stories/efmd/downloadables/EFMD_CEL_Quality_Brochure_SinglePages.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

7. EFQUEL (2011). UNIQUe guidelines. Retrieved from http://cdn.efquel.org/wpcontent/blogs.dir/5/files/2012/09/UNIQUe_guidelines_2011.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

8. Ehlers, U.-D. (2010). Open ECBCheck - Low cost, community based certification for E-learning in Capacity Building. InWEnt, European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning.Search in Google Scholar

9. Graham, C. (2004). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. Graham & J. Bonk (eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer.Search in Google Scholar

10. ISO/IEC 19796-1. (2005). ISO/IEC 19796-1 Information technology - Learning, education and training - Quality management, assurance and metrics - Part 1: General approach. ISO.Search in Google Scholar

11. ISO/IEC 19796-3. (2009). ISO/IEC 19796-3 Information technology - Learning, education and training - Quality management, assurance and metrics - Part 3: Reference methods and metrics. ISO.Search in Google Scholar

12. Merisotis, J.P. and Phipps, R.A. (2000). Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education (Policy Report). IHEP.Search in Google Scholar

13. NP-4512. (2012). NP 4512:2012 Sistema de gestão da formação profissional, incluindo aprendizagem enriquecida por tecnologia - Requisitos. IPQ.Search in Google Scholar

14. ODLQC. (2005). Open and distance learning quality council: standards in open and distance learning.Search in Google Scholar

15. PAS 1032-1. (2004). PAS 1032-1 Learning, education and training focussing on e-learning - Part 1: Reference model for quality management and quality assurance - Planning, development, realisation and evaluation of processes and offers in learning, education and training. DIN.Search in Google Scholar

16. Pawlowski, J. M. (2006). Adopting quality standards for education and e-learning. In Handbook on Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning (pp. 65-77). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-32788-6_510.1007/3-540-32788-6_5Search in Google Scholar

17. Peres, P. and Pimenta, P. (2009). MIPO model - A framework to help the integration of web technologies at the higher education. In K. Terry (ed.), Online Education and Adult Learning: New Frontiers for Teaching Practices. IGI Global (Information Science Publishing).Search in Google Scholar

18. Peres, P. and Pimenta, P. (2011). Teorias e práticas de b-learning. Edições Sílabo.Search in Google Scholar

19. QM. (2011). Quality Matters Rubric Standards 2011 - 2013 edition. Maryland Online, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/layout-1/download/QM%20Standards%202011-2013-4.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

20. Saaty, T. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making. Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. In Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Serie A: Matemáticas (RACSAM), 102(2), (p. 251).Search in Google Scholar

21. SEEQUEL. (2004). Quality Guide to the non-formal and informal Learning Processes. Scienter- MENON Network.Search in Google Scholar

22. UNE-66181. (2012). UNE 66181:2012 Gestión de la calidad. Calidad de la formación virtual. AENOR. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo