How Can Sweden Deal with Forest Management and Municipal Planning in the System of Ongoing Land-Use and Multilevel Planning?

[1] Albrechts, L. (2013). Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective. Planning Theory 12(1), 46–63. DOI: 10.1177/1473095212452722.10.1177/1473095212452722Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Ananda, J. (2004). Implementing participatory approaches in formulating regional forest policy. International Journal of Sustainable Development 7(4), 398–409. DOI: 10.1504/IJSD.2004.006415.10.1504/IJSD.2004.006415Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Andersson, K., Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Axelsson, R. & Degerman, E. (2013). Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: Need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural–urban gradient. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 28(2), 143–165. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2012.723740.10.1080/02827581.2012.723740Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Angelstam, P., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Laestadius, L., Lazdinis, M., Nordberg, M., Pătru-Stupariu, I. & Smith, M. (2011). Knowledge production and learning for sustainable forest management on the ground: Pan-European landscapes as a time machine. Forestry 84(5), 581–596. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpr048.10.1093//cpr048Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Ambjörnsson Laszlo, E., Keskitalo, E. C. H., Karlsson, S. (2016). Forest discourses and the role of planning-related perspectives: the case of Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 31. Issue 1, 111–118. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1070197.10.1080/02827581.2015.1070197Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Baldersheim, H. & Ståhlberg, K. (2002). From guided democracy to multi-level governance: Trends in central-local relations in the Nordic countries. Local Government Studies 28(3), 74–90. DOI: 10.1080/714004149.10.1080/714004149Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Berge, B. & Adolfson, B. (2011). Effektiva planeringsprocesser i – strategier för ytstora kommuner med liten befolkning [Slutrapport pilotprojekt]. Umeå/Luleå: Länsstyrelserna I Norrbotten och Västerbotten.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bjärstig, T., Thellbro, C., Stjernström, O., Svensson, J., Sandström, C., Sandström, P. & Zachrisson, A. (2018). Between protocol and reality – Swedish municipal comprehensive planning. European Planning Studies, 26(1), 35–54. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1365819.10.1080/09654313.2017.1365819Search in Google Scholar

[9] Blücher, G. (2013). Planning Legislation in Sweden – a history of Power over Land-use. In Planning in Sweden (pp. 47–57). Stockholm: Swedish Society for Town and Country Planning.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77–101.DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Cullen, D., McGee, G. J., Gunton, T. I. & Day, J. C. (2010). Collaborative planning in complex stakeholder environments: An evaluation of a two-tiered collaborative planning model. Society and Natural Resources 23(4), 332–350. DOI 10.1080/08941920903002552.10.1080/08941920903002552Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Cullotta, S. & Maetzke, F. (2009). Forest management planning at different geographic levels in Italy: hierarchy, current tools and ongoing development. International Forestry Review 11(4), 475–489. DOI: 10.1505/ifor.11.4.475.10.1505/ifor.11.4.475Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Cullotta, S., Bončina, A., Carvalho-Ribeiro, S. M., Chauvin, C., Farcy, C., Kurttila, M. & Maetzke, F. G. (2015). Forest planning across Europe: the spatial scale, tools, and inter-sectoral integration in land-use planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58(8), 1384–1411. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2014.927754.10.1080/09640568.2014.927754Search in Google Scholar

[14] Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P. & Axelsson, R. (2012). Stakeholder identification and analysis for adaptive governance in the Kovdozersky Model Forest, Russian Federation. The Forestry Chronicle 88(3), 298–305.10.5558/tfc2012-057Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Engström, C-J. & Cars, G. (2013). Planning in a New Reality – New Conditions, Demands, and Discourses. In Planning in Sweden (pp. 11–21). Stockholm: Swedish Society for Town and Country Planning.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Eriksson, L., Nordlund, A. M., Olsson, O. & Westin, K. (2012a). Recreation in different forest settings: A scene preference study. Forests 3(4), 923–943. DOI: 10.3390/f3040923.10.3390/f3040923Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Eriksson, L., Nordlund, A. M., Olsson, O. & Westin K. (2012b). Beliefs about urban fringe forests among urban residents in Sweden. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11(3), 321–328. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.004.10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, 441–473. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Friedmann, J. & Weaver, C. (1979). Territory and Function – The Evolution of Regional Planning. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Fries, C., Carlsson, M., Dahlin, B., Lämås, T. & Sallnäs, O. (1998). A review of conceptual landscape planning models for multiobjective forestry in Sweden. Canadian journal of forest research, 28(2), 159–167. DOI: 10.1139/x97-204.10.1139/x97-204Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] Galland, D. (2012a). Understanding the reorientations and roles of spatial planning: The case of national planning policy in Denmark. European Planning Studies 20(8), 1359–1392. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.680584.10.1080/09654313.2012.680584Search in Google Scholar

[22] Galland, D. (2012b). Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(3), 536–552. DOI: 10.1068/c11150.10.1068/c11150Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Galland, D. & Hansen, C. J. (2012). The roles of planning in waterfront redevelopment: From plan-led and market-driven styles to hybrid planning? Planning Practice and Research 27(2), 203–225. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661669.10.1080/02697459.2012.661669Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Gardner, R., Ostrom, E. & Walker, J. M. (1990). The nature of common-pool resource problems. Rationality and Society 2(3), 335–358. DOI: 10.1177/1043463190002003005.10.1177/1043463190002003005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Gislerud, O. & Neven, I., eds. (2002). National forest programmes in a European context. EFI proceedings No 44. Joensuu: European Forest Institute.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Gunton, T. (2003). Natural Resources and Regional Development: An Assessment of Dependency and Comparative Advantage Paradigms. Economic Geography 79(1), 67–94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00202.x.10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00202.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D. & Vigar, G. (2009). The new spatial planning: Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203864425Search in Google Scholar

[28] Innis, H. A. (1956). The fur trade in Canada, An Introduction to Canadian Economic History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Johansson, J. (2016). Participation and deliberation in Swedish forest governance: The process of initiating a National Forest Program. Forest Policy and Economics 70, 137–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.001.10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Johnson, G. (2013). Regional planning in Sweden. In Lundström, M. J., Fredriksson, C. & Witzell, J., eds., Planning in Sweden (pp. 97–109). Stockholm: Swedish Society for Town and Country Planning.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Kangas, A., Saarinen, N., Saarikoski, H., Leskinen, L. A., Hujala, T. & Tikkanen, J. (2010). Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 12(3), 213–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.10.006.10.1016/j.forpol.2009.10.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[32] Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2004). A framework for multi-level stakeholder studies in response to global change. Local Environment 9(5), 425–435. DOI: 10.1080/1354983042000255333.10.1080/1354983042000255333Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[33] Keskitalo, E. C. H., Baird, J., Ambjörnsson, E. L. & Plummer, R. (2014). Social network analysis of multi-level linkages: A Swedish case study on northern forest-based sectors. Ambio 43(6), 745–758. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0492-0.10.1007/s13280-014-0492-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[34] Lawrence, A. (2009). Forestry in transition: Imperial legacy and negotiated expertise in Romania and Poland. Forest Policy and Economics 11(5–6), 429–436. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.02.003.10.1016/j.forpol.2009.02.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Leskinen, L. (2004). Purposes and challenges of public participation in regional and local forestry in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 6(6), 605–618. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00009-1.10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00009-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Mackintosh, W. A. (1964). The economic background of dominion-provincial relations. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.10.1515/9780773595026Search in Google Scholar

[37] Montiela, C. & Galiana, L. (2005). Forest policy and land planning policy in Spain: a regional approach. Forest Policy and Economics 7(2), 131–142. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00026-1.10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00026-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[38] Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Nyström, J. & Tonell, L. (2012). Planeringens grunder – en översikt. 3rd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Olesen, K. (2013). The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning. Planning Theory, 13(3), 288–303. DOI: 10.1177/1473095213499340.10.1177/1473095213499340Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[41] Saarikoski, H., Åkerman, M. & Primmer, E. (2012). The challenge of governance in regional forest planning: An analysis of participatory forest program processes in Finland. Society and Natural Resources 25(7), 667–682. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.630061.10.1080/08941920.2011.630061Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[42] Sandström, P., Sandström, C., Svensson, J., Jougda, L. & Baer, K. (2012). Participatory GIS to mitigate conflicts between reindeer husbandry and forestry in Vilhelmina Model Forest, Sweden. The Forestry Chronicle 88(3), 254–260. DOI: 10.5558/tfc2012-051.10.5558/tfc2012-051Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[43] Stjernström, O., Karlsson, S. & Pettersson, Ö. (2013). Skogen och den kommunala planeringen. PLAN, 2013(1), 42–45.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Stjernström, O., Ahas, R., Bergstén, S., Eggers, J., Hain, H., Karlsson, S., Keskiltalo E. C. H., Lämås, T., Pettersson, Ö., Sandström, P. & Öhman, K. (2017). Multi-level Planning and Conflicting Interests in the Forest Landscape, in Keskiltao, E. C. H. (ed.), Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-57116-8_7Search in Google Scholar

[45] Tikkanen, J. (2017). Participatory turn – and down-turn – in Finland’s regional forest programme process. Forest Policy and Economics (in press). DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.009.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[46] Tittler, R., Messier, C. & Burton, P. J. (2001). Hierarchical forest management planning and sustainable forest management in the boreal forest. The Forestry Chronicle 77(6), 998–1005. DOI: 10.5558/tfc77998-6.10.5558/tfc77998-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[47] Weber, N. (2017). Participation or involvement? Development of forest strategies on national and sub-national level in Germany. Forest Policy and Economics (in press). DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.002.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[48] Zaremba, M. (2012). Skogen vi ärvde. Stockholm: Weyler förlag.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Finlands skogscentral (2016). Österbottens skogsprogram 2016–2020. Finlands skogscentral.Search in Google Scholar

[50] SFS 1998:808 Miljöbalk (Environemental Code).Search in Google Scholar

[51] SFS 2010:900 Plan- och bygglag (Planning and Building Act).Search in Google Scholar

[52] SFS 1979:429 Skogsvårdslag (Forestry Act).Search in Google Scholar

[53] SOU 1971:75 Hushållning med mark och vatten.Search in Google Scholar

[54] SOU 1979:54 Hushållning med mark och vatten.Search in Google Scholar

[55] SOU 2012:81 Statens regionala förvaltning, förslag till en angelägen reform.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Swedish Forest Agency (2012). Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2012. Jönköping.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Swedish Forest Agency (2016): http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Aga-och-bruka/Skogsbruk/Aga-skog/Skogsbruksplan/.Search in Google Scholar