Provision of Public Services in the Light of Current Global Trends

1. BERKHOUT, F. 2005. Rationales for adaptation in EU climate change policies. In Climate Policy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 377–391.Search in Google Scholar

2. BIESBROEK, G. R. – SWART, R. J. – CARTER, T. R. – COWAN, C., HENRICHS, T. – MELA, H. – MORECROFT, M. D. – REY, D. 2010. Europe adapts to climate change: Comparing National Adaptation Strategies. In Global Environmental Change, vol. 20, pp. 440–450. DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. BOSSAERT, D. – DEMMKE, CH. – MOILANEN, T. 2012. The impact of demographic change and its challenges for the workforce in the European public sectors – Three priority areas to invest in future HRM. EIPA Working paper 2012/W/01. [Online]. [Cited 12.1.2017]. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/39385/.Search in Google Scholar

4. BOSSE, J. – BURNETT, M. – MØLLER NIELSEN, S. – RONGIONE, C. – SCHOLTENS, H. 2015. The Public Sector as Partner for a Better Society. [Online]. [Cited 29.11.2017]. Available at: https://www.eipa.eu/wp–content/uploads/2017/10/PublicSectorAsPartnerForABetterSociety.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

5. BOVAIRD, T., LOEFFLER, E. 2016 (b). The changing context of public policy. In BOVAIRD, T., LOEFFLER, E. (eds.) Public Management and Governance. New York: Routledge, pp. 14–25. ISBN 978–0–415–50186–6.Search in Google Scholar

6. BURCH, S. 2010. Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. In Global Environmental Change, vol. 20, no. 2., pp. 287–297. DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. GAPGEMINI. 2018. Agriculture. [Online]. [Cited 30.6.2017]. Available at: https://www.capgemini.com/industry/agriculture/Search in Google Scholar

8. CLEGG, S. 2007. Something is happening here, but you don’t know what it is, do you, Mister Jones? ICT in the contemporary world. Information Systems and Innovation Group, London School of Economics and Political Science.Search in Google Scholar

9. CORDELLA, A. – BONINA, C. M. 2012. A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. In Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 512–520. DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004.10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. CORDELLA, A. – TEMPINI, N. 2015. E–government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. In Government Information Quarterly. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005.10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005Search in Google Scholar

11. EMI (EUROPEAN MOVEMENT INTERNATIONAL). n. a. Public sector workers in Europe facing the new challenges of migration. [Online]. [Cited 27.10.2017]. Available at: http://europeanmovement.eu/event/public–sector–workers–in–europe–facing–the–new–challenges–of–migration/.Search in Google Scholar

12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2016. Urban Agenda for the EU – Pact of Amsterdam. [Online]. [Cited 29.11.2017]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/pact–of–amsterdam_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

13. GATAUTIS, R. 2008. The Impact of ICT on Public and Private Sectors in Lithuania. In Engineering Economics, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 18–28. ISSN 1392 – 2785.Search in Google Scholar

14. JUHOLA, S. – WESTERHOFF, L. 2011. Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: a case study of network governance in two European countries. In Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 14, pp. 239–247. DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006.10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. KATZ, R. – KOUTROUMPIS, P. – CALLORDA, F. M. 2014. Using a digitalization index to measure the economics and social impact of digital agendas. In Info, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 32–44. DOI 10.1108/info–10–2013–0051.10.1108/info1020130051Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. KOUZMIN, A. – LOFFLER, E. – KLAGES, H. – KORAC–KAKABADSE, N. 1999. Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors. In International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 121–144.Search in Google Scholar

17. LAUKKONEN, J. – BLANCO, P. K. – LENHART, J. – KEINER, M. – CAVRIC, B. – KINUTHIA–NJENGA, C. 2009. Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. In Habitat International, vol. 33, pp. 287–292. DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.003.10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. LETHBRIDGE, J. 2016. Overview of global megatrends affecting local and regional governments. Report for Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU). [Online]. [Cited 29.11.2017]. Available at: http://www.world–psi.org/en/overview–global–megatrends–affecting–local–and–regional–governments.Search in Google Scholar

19. NIANG–DIOP, I. – BOSCH, H. 2004. Formulating an adaptation strategy. In LIM, B., SPANGER–SIEGFRIED, E., HUQ, S., MALONE, E.L., BURTON, I. (Eds.). Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–204. ISBN 0 521 61760 X.Search in Google Scholar

20. NOGUEIRA. R. M. 2006. New roles of the public sector for an agriculture for development agenda. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2008. [Online]. [Cited 12.1.2017]. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/477365–1327599046334/8394679–1327599874257/MartinezNogueira_NewRolesOfPublic.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

21. POTTS, J. – KASTELLE, T. 2010. Public sector innovation research: What’s next? In Innovation: management, policy & practice, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 122–137.Search in Google Scholar

22. PWC. 2015. State–Owned Enterprises – Catalysts for public value creation? [Online]. [Cited 30.6.2017]. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/psrc/publications/assets/pwc–state–owned–enterprise–psrc.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

23. SHOCKLEY, G. – STOUGH, R. – HAYNES, K. – FRANK, P. 2006. Toward a theory of public sector entrepreneurship. In International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 205–223.Search in Google Scholar

24. TREIB, O. – BÄHR, H. – FALKNER, G. – 2007. Modes of governance: towards conceptual clarification. In Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–20. DOI 10.1080/135017606061071406.10.1080/135017606061071406Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. United Nations Organization. 2016. New Urban Agenda. [Online]. [Cited 12.1.2017]. Available at: http://www.telecom.gov.sk/index/index.php?ids=209315.Search in Google Scholar

26. WOLF, D. A. – AMIRKHANYAN, A. A. 2010. Demographic Change and Its Public Sector Consequences. In Public Administration Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12–23. DOI 10.1111/j.1540–6210.2010.02242.x.10.1111/j.15406210.2010.02242.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar