[
American Polygraph Association, (2011), Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of validated Polygraph Techniques, Polygraph, 40 (4), 194–305.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Backster C. (1963), The Backster chart reliability rating method, Law and Order, 1, 63–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elaad E. (1999), The Control Question Technique: A search for improved decision rules, Polygraph, 28, 65–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ginton A. (2009), Relevant Issue Gravity (RIG) Strength – A new concept in PDD that reframes the notion of Psychological Set and the role of attention in CQT polygraph examinations, Polygraph, 38(3), 204–217
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ginton A. (2013, Sept), Adaptive Polygraph. [Paper Presentation]. The annual meeting of the American Polygraph Association, Orlando, FL. USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ginton A. (2019), Essentials of the Relevant Issue Gravity (RIG) Strength; A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Comparison Question Test (CQT); A detailed outline version, European Polygraph, 13 (4), 181–20110.2478/ep-2019-0013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Honts C.R. and Driscoll L.N. (1987), An evaluation of the reliability and validity of rank order and standard numerical scoring of polygraph charts, Polygraph,16 (4), 241–257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keeler L. (1933), Scientific methods of criminal detection with the polygraph, Kansas-Bar association, 2, 22–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krapohl D.J. (2005), Polygraph decision rules for evidentiary and paired-testing (Marin Protocol) applications, Polygraph 34(3), 184–194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krapohl D.J. and Shaw P.K. (2015), Fundamental of polygraph practice, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-802924-4.00005-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matte, J.A., (1996), Forensic Psychophysiology Using the Polygraph, J.A.M. Publications. Williamsville, NY
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council (2003), The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raskin D.C., Honts C.R. and Kircher J.C. (eds.), (2014), Credibility Assessment: Scientific Research and Applications, eds. Elsevier, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raskin D.C. and Honts C.R. (2002), The Comparison Question Test. in Kleiner M. (Ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing, Academic Press, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reid J.E. (1947), A revised questioning technique in lie detection tests, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 37, 542–547.10.2307/1138979
]Search in Google Scholar
