[
Ali S. 2008. Conservation and status of markhor (capra falconeri) in the northen parts of north west frontier province, Pakistan. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers: 10919.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amirnejad H., Jahanifar K. 2018. Comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost method in estimating the recreational values of a forest park. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 21, 1: 36–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakhsh K., Meshaal I., Riaz H. 2019. Evaluating visitors’ travel demand and recreational values in Kallar Kahar Lake, Pakistan. Environment, Development and Sustainability: 0123456789.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bharali A., Mazumder R. 2012. Application of travel cost method to assess the pricing policy of public parks: the case of Kaziranga National Park. Journal of Regional Development and Planning, 1, 1: 44–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bin O., Landry C.E., Ellis C.L., Vogelsong H. 2005. Some consumer surplus estimates for North Carolina beaches. Marine Resource Economics, 20, 2: 145–161.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Booth J., Gaston K., Armsworth P. 2010. Who benefits from recreational use of protected areas? Ecology and Society, 15, 3: 19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borzykowski N., Baranzini A., Maradan D. 2017. A travel cost assessment of the demand for recreation in Swiss forests. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 98, 3: 149–171.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clawson M., Knetsch J.L. 1966. Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czajkowski M., Ahtiainen H., Artell J., Budziński W., Hasler B., Hasselström L., Meyerhoff J., Nõmmann T., Semeniene D., Söderqvist T. 2015. Valuing the commons: An international study on the recreational benefits of the Baltic Sea. Journal of Environmental Management, 156: 209–217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dehlavi A., Adil I.H. 2011. Valuing the recreational uses of Pakistan’s wetlands : An application of the travel cost method. South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE) - Economics & the Environment, 3, 58–11: 132–151.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dudley N., Parrish J.D., Redford K.H., Stolton S. 2010. The revised IUCN protected area management categories: the debate and ways forward. Oryx, 44, 4: 485–490.10.1017/S0030605310000566
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eagles P.F.J. 2014. Research priorities in park tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22, 4: 528–549.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleming C. M., Cook A. 2008. The recreational value of Lake McKenzie, Fraser Island: An application of the travel cost method. Tourism Management, 29, 6: 1197–1205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman A.M. 1992. The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Resources for the Future Press, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaston K.J., Charman K., Jackson S.F., Armsworth P.R., Bonn A., Briers R.A., Callaghan C.S.Q., Catchpole R., Hopkins J., Kunin W.E. 2006. The ecological effectiveness of protected areas: the United Kingdom. Biological Conservation, 132, 1: 76–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghalib S.A., Jabbar A., Wind J., Zehra A., Abbas D. 2008. Avifauna of hingol national park, Balochistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 40, 5: 317–330.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghimire K.B. 1994. Parks and people: livelihood issues in national parks management in Thailand and Madagascar. Development and Change, 25, 1: 195–229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
González R.M., Román C., Ortúzar J. de D. 2019. Preferences for sustainable mobility in natural areas: The case of Teide National Park. Journal of Transport Geography, 76: 42–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greene W. 2008. Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Economics Letters, 99, 3: 585–590.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gürlük S., Rehber E. 2008. A travel cost study to estimate recreational value for a bird refuge at Lake Manyas, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 4: 1350–1360.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iamtrakul P., Teknomo K., Hokao K. 2005. Public park valuation using travel cost method. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5: 1249–1264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Job H., Harrer B., Metzler D., Hajizadeh-Alamdary D. 2005. Ökonomische Effekte von Großschutzgebieten. Untersuchung Der Bedeutung von Großschutzgebieten Für Den Tourismus Und Die Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung Der Region. BfNSkripten (135) Selbstverlag. Bonn-Bad Godesberg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khan H. 2006. Willingness to pay for Margalla Hills National Park: Evidence from the travel cost method. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 11, 2: 43–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krenichyn K. 2006. ‘The only place to go and be in the city’: women talk about exercise, being outdoors, and the meanings of a large urban park. Health & Place, 12, 4: 631–643.10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.08.01516188484
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loomis J., Yorizane S., Larson D. 2000. Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 29, 2: 183–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mangan T., Brouwer R., Lohano H. Das, Nangraj G.M. 2013. Estimating the recreational value of Pakistan’s largest freshwater lake to support sustainable tourism management using a travel cost model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21, 3: 473–486.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayer M., Woltering M. 2018. Assessing and valuing the recreational ecosystem services of Germany’s national parks using travel cost models. Ecosystem Services, 31: 371–386.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moghavvemi S., Woosnam K.M., Paramanathan T., Musa G., Hamzah A. 2017. The effect of residents’ personality, emotional solidarity, and community commitment on support for tourism development. Tourism Management, 63: 242–254.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muhumuza M., Balkwill K. 2013. Factors affecting the success of conserving biodiversity in national parks: A review of case studies from Africa. International Journal of Biodiversity, 2013: 798101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ovaskainen V., Neuvonen M., Pouta E. 2012. Modelling recreation demand with respondent-reported driving cost and stated cost of travel time: A Finnish case. Journal of Forest Economics, 18, 4: 303–317.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pirikiya M., Amirnejad H., Oladi J., Solout K.A. 2016. Determining the recreational value of forest park by travel cost method and defining its effective factors. Journal of Forest Science, 62, 9: 399–406.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rafiq M., Shafiqullah M., Malik A. 2007. Demand analysis of recreation visits to chitral valley: A natural resource management perspective. Pakistan Development Review, 46, 4: 971–983.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Randall A. 1994. A difficulty with the travel cost method. Land Economics, 70, 1: 88–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shores K.A., Scott D., Floyd M.F. 2007. Constraints to outdoor recreation: A multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. Leisure Sciences, 29, 3: 227–246.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Somuncu M., Khan A.A., Waseem L.I. 2009. Review of Protected Areas System in Pakistan: Present Status and Problems Concerning Future Development: Pakistan’daki Korunan Alanlar Sisteminin Değerlendirilmesi: Mevcut Durum ve Gelecekteki Gelişm.10.1501/Csaum_0000000010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stemberk J., Dolejs J., Maresova P., Kuca K. 2018. Factors affecting the number of visitors in national parks in the Czech Republic, Germany and Austria. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7, 3: 124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stigner M.G., Beyer H.L., Klein C.J., Fuller R.A. 2016. Reconciling recreational use and conservation values in a coastal protected area. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53, 4: 1206–1214.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suhel S., Bashir A., Yuliana S. 2019. Identifying the determining factors of recreation demand in kongar lake of south sumatera: An individual travel cost approach. Forest and Society, 3, 1: 34–48.10.24259/fs.v3i1.5982
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vicente E., de Frutos P. 2011. Application of the travel cost method to estimate the economic value of cultural goods: Blockbuster art exhibitions. Revista de Economia Pública, 196, 1: 37–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walpole M.J., Goodwin H.J. 2001. Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environmental Conservation, 160–166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waqas U., Hasnain S.A., Ahmad E., Abbasi M., Pandrani A. 2012. Conservation of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) at Daran beach, Jiwani, Balochistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 43, 1: 85–90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watson J.E.M., Dudley N., Segan D.B., Hockings M. 2014. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 7525: 67–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witt B. 2019. Tourists’willingness to pay increased entrance fees at Mexican protected areas: A multi-site contingent valuation study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11, 11: 3041.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zydroń A., Szoszkiewicz K., Chwiałkowski C. 2021. Valuing protected areas: Socioeconomic determinants of the willingness to pay for the National Park. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 2: 765.
]Search in Google Scholar
and 