[
[1] Arblaster M, Zhang C. Liberalisation of airport air traffic control: A case study of Spain. Transp Policy. 2020;91:38-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.003.10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Galvin JJ. Air Traffic Control Resource Management Strategies and the Small Aircraft Transportation System: A System Dynamics Perspective [PhD Thesis]. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; 2002. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242281854_Air_traffic_control_resource_management_strategies_and_the_small_aircraft_transportation_system_A_system_dynamics_perspective.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Kistan T, Gardi A, Sabatini R, Ramasamy S, Batuwangala E. An evolutionary outlook of air traffic flow management techniques. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2017;88:15-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.10.001.10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Cooke DL, Rohleder TR. Learning from incidents: from normal accidents to high reliability. Syst Dyn Rev. 2006;22(3):27. DOI: 10.1002/sdr.338.10.1002/sdr.338
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Chen F, Liu LL. Research on safety services capability model for ATC service in ATM division. Energy Procedia. 2012;17(1):1369-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.254.10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Forrester JW. System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. Syst Dyn Rev. 1994;10(2-3):245-56. DOI: 10.1002/sdr.4260100211.10.1002/sdr.4260100211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Forrester JW. System dynamics - a personal view of the first fifty years. Syst Dyn Rev. 2007;23(2-3):345-58. DOI: 10.1002/sdr.382.10.1002/sdr.382
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Bouloiz H, Garbolino E, Tkiouat M, Guarnieri F. A system dynamics model for behavioral analysis of safety conditions in a chemical storage unit. Safety Sci. 2013;58:32-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.013.10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Han SU, Saba F, Lee SH, Y Mohamed, Peña-Mora F. Toward an understanding of the impact of production pressure on safety performance in construction operations. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;68(1):106-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.007.10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.00724184131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Vafa-Arani H, Jahani S, Dashti H, Heydari J, Moazen S. A system dynamics modeling for urban air pollution: A case study of Tehran, Iran. Transportation Res Part D: Transport Environ. 2014;31(31):21-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.016.10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Yao H, Shen L, Tan Y, Hao J. Simulating the impacts of the policy scenarios on the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects. Automat Constr. 2011;20(8):1060-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.007.10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Shin M, Lee HS, Park M, Moon M, Han S. A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers’ safety attitudes and behaviors. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;68(2):95-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.019.10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Suryani E, Chou SY, Hartono R, Chen CH. Demand scenario analysis and planned capacity expansion: A system dynamics framework. Simul Modelling Practice Theory. 2010;18(6):732-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2010.01.013.10.1016/j.simpat.2010.01.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Lyneis JM. System dynamics for market forecasting and structural analysis. Syst Dyn Rev. 2000;16(1):3-25. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1727(200021)16:1<3::aid-sdr183>3.0.co;2-5.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(200021)16:1<3::AID-SDR183>3.0.CO;2-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Peter S. The fifth discipline. The United States: Random House Audio; 1999. ISBN: 9780553456349.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Sama M, D’Ariano A, D’Ariano P, Pacciarelli D. Optimal aircraft scheduling and routing at a terminal control area during disturbances. Transportation Res Part C: Emer Technol. 2014;47:61-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.005.10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Loft S, Sanderson P, Neal A, Mooij M. Modeling and predicting mental workload in en route air traffic control: critical review and broader implications. Hum Factors. 2007;49(3):376-99. DOI: 10.1518/001872007x197017.10.1518/001872007X197017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Pandey MM, Shukla D, Graham A. Evaluating the human performance factors of air traffic control in Thailand using Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making method. J Air Transp Manage. 2019;8:101708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101708.10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101708
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Mearns K, Kirwan B, Reader TW, Jackson J, Kennedy R, Gordon R. Development of a methodology for understanding and enhancing safety culture in Air Traffic Management. Safety Sci. 2013;53:123-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.09.001.10.1016/j.ssci.2012.09.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Chang YH, Yeh CH. Human performance interfaces in air traffic control. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(1):123-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.06.002.10.1016/j.apergo.2009.06.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Subotic B, Ochieng WY, Straeter O. Recovery from equipment failures in ATC: Determination of contextual factors. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2007;92(7):858-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.023.10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Ali BS, Majumdar A, Ochieng WY, Schuster W, Chiew TK. A causal factors analysis of aircraft incidents due to radar limitations: The Norway case study. J Air Transp Manage. 2015;44-45:103-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.004.10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Sterman JD. Systems simulation. Expectation formation in behavioral simulation models. Syst Res Behav Sci. 1987;32(3):190-211. DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830320304.10.1002/bs.3830320304
]Search in Google Scholar
