New Technology Tools and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) Applied to a Sustainable Livestock Production

1FAO report 2018.OECD & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2019), OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019–2028. (Rome: FAO: 2018).FAO report 2018.OECD & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2019), OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019–2028 Rome: FAO: 2018Search in Google Scholar

2FAO report 2017.The future of food and agriculture– Trends and challenges. (Rome: FAO: 2017).FAO report 2017 The future of food and agriculture– Trends and challenges. (Rome: FAO: 2017)Search in Google Scholar

3Gaber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. (Rome: FAO: 2013).Gaber PJ Steinfeld H Henderson B Mottet A Opio C Dijkman J Falcucci A Tempio G Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities Rome FAO 2013Search in Google Scholar

4Angel SP, Amitha JP, Rashamol VP, Vandana GD. Climate change and cattle production – impact and adaptation. J Vet Med Res 2018; 5: 1134.Angel SP Amitha JP Rashamol VP Vandana GD Climate change and cattle production – impact and adaptation J Vet Med Res 2018 5 1134Search in Google Scholar

5Grossi G, Goglio P, Vitali A, Williams AG. Livestock and climate change: impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies. Anim Front 2019; 9: 69–76.Grossi G Goglio P Vitali A Williams AG Livestock and climate change: impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies Anim Front 2019 9 69 7610.1093/af/vfy034701546232071797Search in Google Scholar

6FAO 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050, the 2012 revision. (Rome: FAO: 2012). 2012 World agriculture towards 2030/2050, the 2012 revision. (Rome: FAO: 2012)Search in Google Scholar

7FAO 2013. Sustainable Food Consumption and Production. (Rome: FAO: 2013). 2013 Sustainable Food Consumption and Production. (Rome: FAO: 2013)Search in Google Scholar

8Alexandratos N and Bruinsma J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050.The 2012 revision. ESA Working Paper No. 12–03. (Rome: FAO: 2012).Alexandratos N Bruinsma J World agriculture towards 2030/2050.The 2012 revision. ESA Working Paper No. 12–03 Rome FAO 2012Search in Google Scholar

9FAO 2009. Global agriculture towards 2050. In How to Feed the World 2050 1–10. (Rome: FAO: 2009). 2009 Global agriculture towards 2050. In How to Feed the World 2050 1–10 Rome FAO 2009Search in Google Scholar

10Foley JA, Ramankutty N, BraumanKA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nat 2011 478: 337.Foley JA Ramankutty N Brauman KA Cassidy ES Gerber JS Johnston M Mueller ND O’Connell C Ray DK West PC Balzer C 2011 Solutions for a cultivated planet Nat 2011 478 33710.1038/nature1045221993620Search in Google Scholar

11Delgado C, Rosegrant M, Steinfeld H, Ehui, S, Courbois C. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. IFPRI Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 28. (Washington: IFPRI: 1999).Delgado C Rosegrant M Steinfeld H Ehui S Courbois C Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. IFPRI Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 28 Washington IFPRI 1999Search in Google Scholar

12Wilkinson JM, Lee MRF. Review: Use of human-edible animal feeds by ruminant livestock. Animal 2018; 12(8): 1735–1743.Wilkinson JM Lee MRF Review: Use of human-edible animal feeds by ruminant livestock Animal 2018 12 8 1735 174310.1017/S175173111700218X28893333Search in Google Scholar

13de Vries M, de Boer JM. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci 2010 128: 1–1.de Vries M de Boer JM Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments Livest Sci 2010 128 1 110.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007Search in Google Scholar

14ILCD. International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment - detailed guidance. (Luxembourg: UE: 2010).ILCD. International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment - detailed guidance Luxembourg UE 2010Search in Google Scholar

15Borchers MR, Bewley JM. An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, pre-purchase considerations, and usefulness. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 4198–4205.Borchers MR Bewley JM An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, pre-purchase considerations, and usefulness J Dairy Sci 2015 98 4198 420510.3168/jds.2014-896325892693Search in Google Scholar

16Caja G, Castro-Costa A, Knight CH. Engineering to support wellbeing of dairy animals. J Dairy Res 2016; 83: 136–147.Caja G Castro-Costa A Knight CH Engineering to support wellbeing of dairy animals J Dairy Res 2016 83 136 14710.1017/S002202991600026127210489Search in Google Scholar

17De Marchi M, Toffanin V, Cassandro M, Penasa M. Invited review: mid-infrared spectroscopy as phenotyping tool for milk traits. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97: 1171–1186.De Marchi M Toffanin V Cassandro M Penasa M Invited review: mid-infrared spectroscopy as phenotyping tool for milk traits J Dairy Sci 2014 97 1171 118610.3168/jds.2013-679924440251Search in Google Scholar

18Egger-Danner C, Cole JB, Pryce JE, Gengler N, Heringstad B, Bradley A, Stock KF. Invited review: overview of new traits and phenotyping strategies in dairy cattle with a focus on functional traits. Animals 2015; 9: 191–207.Egger-Danner C Cole JB Pryce JE Gengler N Heringstad B Bradley A Stock KF Invited review: overview of new traits and phenotyping strategies in dairy cattle with a focus on functional traits Animals 2015 9 191 20710.1017/S1751731114002614429953725387784Search in Google Scholar

19Gargiulo JI, Eastwood CR, Garcia SC, Lyons NA. Dairy farmers with larger herd sizes adopt moreprecision dairy technologies. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101: 5466–5473.Gargiulo JI Eastwood CR Garcia SC Lyons NA Dairy farmers with larger herd sizes adopt moreprecision dairy technologies J Dairy Sci 2018 101 5466 547310.3168/jds.2017-1332429525319Search in Google Scholar

20Halachmi I, Guarino M, Bewley J, Pastell M. Smart animal agriculture: application of real-time sensors to improve animal wellbeing and production. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2019; 7: 403–425.Halachmi I Guarino M Bewley J Pastell M Smart animal agriculture: application of real-time sensors to improve animal wellbeing and production Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2019 7 403 42510.1146/annurev-animal-020518-11485130485756Search in Google Scholar

21Hartung J, Banhazi T, Vranken, E, Guarino M. European farmers’ experiences with precision livestockfarming systems. Anim Front 2017; 7: 38–4.Hartung J Banhazi T Vranken E Guarino M European farmers’ experiences with precision livestockfarming systems Anim Front 2017 7 38 410.2527/af.2017.0107Search in Google Scholar

22Kaniyamattam K, De Vries A. Agreement between milk fat, protein, and lactose observations collected from the Dairy Herd Improvement Association (DHIA) and a real-time milk analyzer. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97: 2896– 2908.Kaniyamattam K De Vries A Agreement between milk fat, protein, and lactose observations collected from the Dairy Herd Improvement Association (DHIA) and a real-time milk analyzer J Dairy Sci 2014 97 2896–290810.3168/jds.2013-769024630652Search in Google Scholar

23Koltes JE, Cole JB, Clemmens R, Dilger RN, Kramer LM, Lunney JK, McCue ME, McKay SD, Mateescu RG, Murdoch BM. A vision for development and utilization of high-throughput phenotyping and big data analytics in livestock. Front Genet 2019; 10: 1197.Koltes JE Cole JB Clemmens R Dilger RN Kramer LM Lunney JK McCue ME McKay SD Mateescu RG Murdoch BM A vision for development and utilization of high-throughput phenotyping and big data analytics in livestock Front Genet 2019 10 119710.3389/fgene.2019.01197693405931921279Search in Google Scholar

24Lokhorst C, de Mol RM, Kamphuis C. Invited review: big data in precision dairy farming. Animals 2019; 13: 1519– 1528.Lokhorst C de Mol RM Kamphuis C Invited review: big data in precision dairy farming Animals 2019 13 1519–152810.1017/S1751731118003439658196430630546Search in Google Scholar

25Neves RC, LeBlanc SJ. Reproductive management practices and performance of Canadian dairy herdsusing automated activity-monitoring systems. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 2801–2811.Neves RC LeBlanc SJ Reproductive management practices and performance of Canadian dairy herdsusing automated activity-monitoring systems J Dairy Sci 2015 98 2801 281110.3168/jds.2014-822125660748Search in Google Scholar

26Rutten CJ, Velthuis AGJ, Steeneveld W, Hogeveen H. Invited review: Sensors to support healthmanagement on dairy farm. J Dairy Sci 2013; 98: 1928–1952.Rutten CJ Velthuis AGJ Steeneveld W Hogeveen H Invited review: Sensors to support healthmanagement on dairy farm J Dairy Sci 2013 98 1928 195210.3168/jds.2012-610723462176Search in Google Scholar

27Sauls JA, Voelz BE, Hill SL, Mendonça LGD, Stevenson JS. Increasing estrus expression in the lactating dairy cow. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100: 807–820.Sauls JA Voelz BE Hill SL Mendonça LGD Stevenson JS Increasing estrus expression in the lactating dairy cow J Dairy Sci 2017 100 807 82010.3168/jds.2016-1151927889121Search in Google Scholar

28Song X, Bokkers EAM, van Mourik S, Groot Koerkamp PWG, van der Tol PPJ. Automated body condition scoring of dairy cows using 3-dimensional feature extraction from multiple body regions. J Dairy Sci 2019; 102: 4294–4308.Song X Bokkers EAM van Mourik S Groot Koerkamp PWG van der Tol PPJ Automated body condition scoring of dairy cows using 3-dimensional feature extraction from multiple body regions J Dairy Sci 2019 102 4294 430810.3168/jds.2018-1523830879819Search in Google Scholar

29Steeneveld W, Hogeveen H, Lansink AGJMO. Economic consequences of investing in sensor systems on dairy farms, Comput. Electron Agric 2015; 119: 3-39.Steeneveld W Hogeveen H Lansink AGJMO Economic consequences of investing in sensor systems on dairy farms, Comput Electron Agric 2015 119 3 39Search in Google Scholar

30Steeneveld W, Hogeveen H. Characterization of Dutch dairy farms using sensor systems for cow management. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 709-717.Steeneveld W Hogeveen H Characterization of Dutch dairy farms using sensor systems for cow management J Dairy Sci 2015 98 709 71710.3168/jds.2014-859525465556Search in Google Scholar

31Tse C, Barkema HW, DeVries TJ, Rushen J, Pajor EA. Effect of transitioning to automatic milking systems on producers’ perceptions of farm management and cow health in the Canadian dairy industry. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100: 2404–2414.Tse C Barkema HW DeVries TJ Rushen J Pajor EA Effect of transitioning to automatic milking systems on producers’ perceptions of farm management and cow health in the Canadian dairy industry J Dairy Sci 2017 100 2404 241410.3168/jds.2016-1152128109587Search in Google Scholar

32Van De Gucht T, Saeys W, Van Nu el A, Pluym L, Piccart K, Lauwers L, Vangeyte J, Van Weyenberg S. Farmers’ preferences for automatic lameness-detection systems in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100: 5746–5757.Van De Gucht T Saeys W Van Nu el A Pluym L Piccart K Lauwers L Vangeyte J Van Weyenberg S Farmers’ preferences for automatic lameness-detection systems in dairy cattle J Dairy Sci 2017 100 5746 575710.3168/jds.2016-1228528527794Search in Google Scholar

33Van Hertem T, Maltz E, Antler A, Romanini CEB, Viazzi S, Bahr C, Schlageter-Tello A, Lokhorst C, Berckmans D, Halachmi I. Lameness detection based on multivariate continuous sensing of milk yield, rumination, and neck activity. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 4286–4298.Van Hertem T Maltz E Antler A Romanini CEB Viazzi S Bahr C Schlageter-Tello A Lokhorst C Berckmans D Halachmi I Lameness detection based on multivariate continuous sensing of milk yield, rumination, and neck activity J Dairy Sci 2013 96 4286 429810.3168/jds.2012-618823684042Search in Google Scholar

34Van Hertem T, Rooijakkers L, Berckmans D, Peña Fernández A, Norton T, Berckmans D, Vranken E. Appropriate data visualisation is key to Precision Livestock Farming acceptance. Comput Electron Agric 2017; 138: 1–10.Van Hertem T Rooijakkers L Berckmans D Peña Fernández A Norton T Berckmans D Vranken E Appropriate data visualisation is key to Precision Livestock Farming acceptance Comput Electron Agric 2017 138 1 1010.1016/j.compag.2017.04.003Search in Google Scholar

35Abeni F, Galli A. Monitoring cow activity and rumination time for an early detection of heat stress in dairy cow. Int J Biometeorol 2017; 61 (3): 417-425.Abeni F Galli A Monitoring cow activity and rumination time for an early detection of heat stress in dairy cow Int J Biometeorol 2017 61 3 417 42510.1007/s00484-016-1222-z27498881Search in Google Scholar

36Cabrera VE, Kalantari AS. Economics of production efficiency: Nutritional grouping of the lactating cow. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 825-841.Cabrera VE Kalantari AS Economics of production efficiency: Nutritional grouping of the lactating cow J Dairy Sci 2016 99 825 84110.3168/jds.2015-984626519971Search in Google Scholar

37Carlström C, Pettersson G, Johansson K, Strandberg E, Stålhammar H, Philipsson J. Feasibility of using automatic milking system data from commercial herds for genetic analysis of milkability. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 5.Carlström C Pettersson G Johansson K Strandberg E Stålhammar H Philipsson J Feasibility of using automatic milking system data from commercial herds for genetic analysis of milkability J Dairy Sci 2013 96 510.3168/jds.2012-622123706483Search in Google Scholar

38Lawson LG, Pedersen SM, Sørensen CG, Pesonen L, Fountas S, Werner A, Oudshoorn FW, Herold L, Chatzinikos T, Kirketerp IM. A four nation survey of farm information management and advanced farming systems: A descriptive analysis of survey responses. Comput Electron Agric 2011; 7: 7–20.Lawson LG Pedersen SM Sørensen CG Pesonen L Fountas S Werner A Oudshoorn FW Herold L Chatzinikos T Kirketerp IM A four nation survey of farm information management and advanced farming systems: A descriptive analysis of survey responses Comput Electron Agric 2011 7 7 2010.1016/j.compag.2011.03.002Search in Google Scholar

39Pimentel D. Livestock production: energy inputs and the environment. Can Soc Anim Sci 1997; 47: 17–26.Pimentel D Livestock production: energy inputs and the environment Can Soc Anim Sci 1997 47 17 26Search in Google Scholar

40Aiking H. Future protein supply. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2011; 2 (2–3): 112-120. Aiking H Future protein supply Trends Food Sci Technol 2011 2 2–3 112 12010.1016/j.tifs.2010.04.005Search in Google Scholar

41D’Agaro E. New Advances in NGS Technologies. In: New Trends In Veterinary Genetics. (London: Intech Editions: 2017).D’Agaro E New Advances in NGS Technologies. In: New Trends In Veterinary Genetics London Intech Editions 201710.5772/66924Search in Google Scholar

42D’Agaro E. Artificial intelligence used in genome analysis studies. Eurobiotech J 2018; 2(2): 78-8.D’Agaro E Artificial intelligence used in genome analysis studies Eurobiotech J 2018 2 2 78 810.2478/ebtj-2018-0012Search in Google Scholar

43Berckmans D. General introduction to precision livestock farming. Anim Front 2017; 7: 6–1.Berckmans D General introduction to precision livestock farming Anim Front 2017 7 6 110.2527/af.2017.0102Search in Google Scholar

44Rexroad C, Vallet J, Matukumalli LK, Reecy J, Bickhart D, Blackburn H, Boggess M, Cheng H, Clutter A, Cockett N. Genome to phenome: improving animal health, production, and well-being—a new USDA blueprint for animal genome research 2018-2027. Front Genet 2019; 10: 327.Rexroad C Vallet J Matukumalli LK Reecy J Bickhart D Blackburn H Boggess M Cheng H Clutter A Cockett N Genome to phenome: improving animal health, production, and well-being—a new USDA blueprint for animal genome research 2018-2027 Front Genet 2019 10 32710.3389/fgene.2019.00327653245131156693Search in Google Scholar

45van der Werf HMG, Garnett T, Corson MS, Hayashi K, Huisingh D, Cederberg C. Towards eco-efficient agriculture and food systems: theory, praxis and future challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2014; 73: 1–9.van der Werf HMG Garnett T Corson MS Hayashi K Huisingh D Cederberg C Towards eco-efficient agriculture and food systems: theory, praxis and future challenges J. Clean. Prod 2014 73 1 910.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.017Search in Google Scholar

46Connor EE, Hutchison JL, Norman HD, Olson KM, Van Tassell CP, Leith JM, Baldwin RLV. Use of residual feed intake in Holsteins during early lactation shows potential to improve feed efficiency through genetic selection. J Anim Sci 2013; 91: 3978–3988.Connor EE Hutchison JL Norman HD Olson KM Van Tassell CP Leith JM Baldwin RLV Use of residual feed intake in Holsteins during early lactation shows potential to improve feed efficiency through genetic selection J Anim Sci 2013 91 3978 398810.2527/jas.2012-597723658326Search in Google Scholar

47de Haas Y, Windig JJ, Calus M, Dijkstra J, de Haan M, Bannink A, Veerkamp RF. Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection. J Dairy Sci 2011 94: 6122–6134.de Haas Y Windig JJ Calus M Dijkstra J de Haan M Bannink A Veerkamp RF Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection J Dairy Sci 2011 94 6122 613410.3168/jds.2011-443922118100Search in Google Scholar

48Yan T, Mayne CS, Gordon FG, Porter MG, Agnew RE, Patterson DC, Ferris CP, Kilpatrick DJ. Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93: 2630–2638.Yan T Mayne CS Gordon FG Porter MG Agnew RE Patterson DC Ferris CP Kilpatrick DJ Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows J Dairy Sci 2010 93 2630 263810.3168/jds.2009-292920494172Search in Google Scholar

49Sere, C.; Steinfeld, H. World livestock production systems: current status, issues and trends. Animal Production and Health Paper No 127. (Rome: FAO: 1996).Sere C Steinfeld H World livestock production systems: current status, issues and trends. Animal Production and Health Paper No 127 Rome FAO 1996Search in Google Scholar

50OECD/FAO 2016. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook. OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2016.OECD/FAO 2016 OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook. OECD Publishing Paris, France 2016Search in Google Scholar

51USDA. USDA Nutritional Database for Standard Reference Release 27. USDA Agricultural Research Service. (Washington: USDA: 2014).USDA USDA Nutritional Database for Standard Reference Release 27. USDA Agricultural Research Service Washington USDA 2014Search in Google Scholar

52Flachowsky G, Meyer U, Südekum KH. Land Use for Edible Protein of Animal Origin—A Review. Animals 2017; 7(3): 25.Flachowsky G Meyer U Südekum KH Land Use for Edible Protein of Animal Origin—A Review Animals 2017 7 3 2510.3390/ani7030025536684428335483Search in Google Scholar

53ISO 2006a. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework. EN ISO 14040:2006. EN ISO 14040. (Geneva: ISO: 2006). ISO 2006a Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework. EN ISO 140402006 EN ISO 14040. (Geneva: ISO: 2006)Search in Google Scholar

54ISO 2006b. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines. EN ISO 14044:2006. EN ISO 14044:2006. (Geneva: ISO: 2006).ISO 2006b Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines EN ISO 140442006 EN ISO 14044:2006. (Geneva: ISO: 2006)Search in Google Scholar

55Pimentel D, Pimentel M. Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 78: 660-663.Pimentel D Pimentel M Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment Am J Clin Nutr 2003 78 660 66310.1093/ajcn/78.3.660S12936963Search in Google Scholar

56IPCC 2014. Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. (Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press: 2014).IPCC 2014 Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge (UK) Cambridge University Press 2014Search in Google Scholar

57Sonesoon U, Davis J, Ziegler F. Green-House Gases from livestock production EU27. (Göteborg: Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology: 2011).Sonesoon U Davis J Ziegler F Green-House Gases from livestock production EU27 Göteborg Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology 2011Search in Google Scholar