Open Access

Compared salt tolerance of five local wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars of Albania based on morphology, pigment synthesis and glutathione content


Cite

Figure 1

Impact of different concentrations of salinity on leaf lengths (cm) for five wheat cultivars. Data represent mean values of leaves length (cm) and standard deviation (error bars) for three repeated measurements. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.
Impact of different concentrations of salinity on leaf lengths (cm) for five wheat cultivars. Data represent mean values of leaves length (cm) and standard deviation (error bars) for three repeated measurements. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.

Figure 2

Impact of different concentrations of salinity on root lengths (cm) for five wheat cultivars. Data represent mean values of leaves length (cm) and standard deviation (error bars) for three repeated measurements. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.
Impact of different concentrations of salinity on root lengths (cm) for five wheat cultivars. Data represent mean values of leaves length (cm) and standard deviation (error bars) for three repeated measurements. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.

Figure 3

Impact of saline treatments on mean shoot length (cm). Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.
Impact of saline treatments on mean shoot length (cm). Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.

Figure 4

Differences among mean chla content (mg/g fresh weight) for five wheat cultivars under saline treatments. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Post Hoc Tukey Test.
Differences among mean chla content (mg/g fresh weight) for five wheat cultivars under saline treatments. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Post Hoc Tukey Test.

Figure 5

Differences among mean chlb content (mg/g fresh weight) for five wheat cultivars under saline treatments. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.
Differences among mean chlb content (mg/g fresh weight) for five wheat cultivars under saline treatments. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.

Figure 6

Differences among mean total chl content (mg/g fresh weight) for five wheat cultivars under saline treatments. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test. Values are means from three independent experiments. Different letters indicates statistically significant difference between treatments of the same cultivar.
Differences among mean total chl content (mg/g fresh weight) for five wheat cultivars under saline treatments. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test. Values are means from three independent experiments. Different letters indicates statistically significant difference between treatments of the same cultivar.

Figure 7

Differences among mean carotenoids+xantophylls content (mg/g fresh weight), for five wheat cultivars under saline treatments. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.
Differences among mean carotenoids+xantophylls content (mg/g fresh weight), for five wheat cultivars under saline treatments. Mean values followed by different letters within the same cultivar are statistically different (p<0.05) according to Tukey Test.

Figure 8

Ratio Chla / Chlb at wheat cultivars two and three weeks after saline treatment.
Ratio Chla / Chlb at wheat cultivars two and three weeks after saline treatment.

Summary of the effect of salinity concentration on root, shoot and leaf development of five bread wheat cultivars during seedling in modified Hoagland solution (three weeks after treatment). Arrows directions

CultivarsRoots developmentShoots developmentLeaf development
Dajti
Suba
Toborzo
Viktoria
Nogal

Chlorophyll concentration (chla, chlb, tot chl, carotenoids and xanthophylls) of different wheat cultivars grown under normal and saline environments. Data is displayed as means±standart deviation (n=3). Different letters, for each cultivar, indicate significant differences (p<0.05) among NaCl treatments by Tukey test.

CultivarTreatment (NaCl)2nd week3rd week
chla in mg/g fresh weightchlb in mg/g fresh weighttot chlcarotenoids + xanthophylls in mg/g fresh weightchla in mg/g fresh weightchlb in mg/g fresh weighttot chlcarotenoids + xanthophylls in mg/g fresh weight
Suba0 mM0.60±0.25 a0.147±0.5 a0.75±0.29 a42.8±15.8 a0.59±0.01 a0.12±0.01 a1.18±0.05 a46.9±0.1 a
50 mM0.78±0.27 a0.21±0.08 a0.98±0.35 a55.4±15.9 a1.097±0.15 b0.17±0.05 b0.74±0.03 b58.22±0.56 b
100 mM1.01±0.07 a0.255±0.02 a1.26±0.09 a65.2±10.4 a1.06±0.01 c0.24±0.14 c1.34±0.013 b68.5±0.55 c
200 mM0.77±0.26 a0.21±0.07 a0.97±0.32 a55.2±10.6 a0.47±0.01 d0.27±0.02 d1.33±0.04 c65.8±0.15 d
Toborzo0 mM0.51±0.26 a0.13±0.7 a0.63±0.33 a35.47±19.7 a0.94±0.001 a0.21±0.01 a0.48±0.6 a56.9±0.15 a
50 mM0.74±0.23 a0.17±0.6 a0.91±0.29 a48.4±12.8 a0.72±0.02 b0.19±0.003 a0.92±0.01 a51.7±0.03 b
100 mM0.82±0.18 a0.21±0.05 a1.03±0.23 a56.2±13.1 a0.53±0.01 c0.14±0.001 b0.67±0.002 a40.9±0.02 c
200 mM0.8±0.39 a0.22±0.1 a1.07±0.48 a57.4±21.5 a0.66±0.002 d0.2±0.01 a0.84±0.001 a50.0±0.5 d
Viktoria0 mM0.55±0.1 a0.14±0.03 b0.68±0.13 a39.6±6.95 a0.84±0.001 a0.20±0.005 a1.02±0.02 a52.1±0.27 a
50 mM0.77±0.07 ab0.21±0.02 b0.99±0.09 ab54.9±4.54 ab0.97±0.01 b0.21±0.003 b1.18±0.01 b63±0.087 b
100 mM0.72±0.17 ab0.17±0.04 b0.9±0.21 ab49.9±10.7 ab0.65±0.01 c0.13±0.005 c0.80±0.005 b41.7±0.006 c
200 mM0.9±0.13 b0.23±0.04 b1.1±0.17 b63.1±7.25 b0.64± 0.02 d0.16±0.001 d0.80±0.008 c49.1±0.04 d
Nogal0 mM1.08±0.3 ab0.31±0.01 a1.38±0.04 a74.5±1.8 a0.71±0.03 a0.19±0.002 a0.9±0.01 a51.4±0.01 a
50 mM0.9±0.05 a0.24±0.02 b1.14±0.7 b63.7±1.44 a0.5±0.01 b0.13±0.001 b0.63±0.02 b35±0.005 b
100 mM1.0±0.09 ab0.24±0.01 b1.26±0.1 ab70.4±8.54 a0.71±0.01 a0.16±0.006 c0.87±0.002 c39.1±0.2 c
200 mM1.0±0.1 b0.25±0.04 b1.38±0.13 a74.7±8.54 a0.69±0.01 c0.122±0.01 d0.81±0.002 d38.1±0.17 d
Dajti0 mM0.82±0.11 a0.22±0.04 a1.04±0.15 a57.3±7.46 a0.42±0.01 a0.17±0.04 a0.53±0.4 a32.6±0.01 a
50 mM0.91±0.08 a0.26±0.02 a1.17±0.1 a66.9±3.9 a0.74±0.03 b0.21±0.02 a0.95±0.01 b56.85±0.05 b
100 mM0.86±0.17 a0.02±0.01 a0.97±0.1 a56.78±4.6 a0.66±0.01 c0.31±0.25 a0.82±0.08 c46.27±0.03 c
200 mM0.8±0.11 a0.04±0.02 a1.0±0.14 a57.1±9.0 a0.40±0.02d0.09±0.007 a0.49±0.03 d29.4±0.02 d

GSH (mM) for wheat cultivars Suba, Toborzo,Viktoria, Nogal and Dajti treated with modified Hoagland solution (0-50-100-200 mM NaCl), 2 and 3 weeks after treatment

Wheat cultivarWeek of measurementTreatment with salinity (NaCl)Value of test p=0.05
Controls (0 NaCl)50 mM100 mM200 mMWeek/treatment
Suba2nd0.64 a0.86 a0.31 b0.14 bp=0.002
3rd0.31 a0.78 b0.38 a0.09 ap=0.003
Toborzo2nd0.11 a0.37 a0.52 a0.50 ap=0.085
3rd0.19 a0.39 ab0.54 b0.48 abp=0.042
Viktoria2nd0.58 c0.72 c0.71 c0.83 cp=0.408
3rd0.43 c0.77 c0.39 c0.36 cp=0.055
Nogal2nd0.72 ab1.06 b0.93 b0.58 ap=0.016
3rd0.21 ab0.15 a0.51 ab0.67 bp=0.026
Dajti2nd0.36 a0.59 ab0.96 b0.23 ap=0.005
3rd0.45 a0.51a0.167 a0.27 ap=0.467

Impact of salinity on morphological parameters (length of leaf, root and shoot)

Parameters measured (in cm)Treatment (mMNaCl)Wheat cultivars
SubaToborzoViktoriaNogalDajti
Root011.6±0.87 a10.76±1.78 a24.13 ±0.32 a10.37±1.98 a15.43±0.55 a
5011.0±0.45 a8.43±3.10 a15.03±0.15bc8.63±2.030 a13.47±0.42ab
10011.4±1.32 a7.27±0.85 a15.15±0.5 cd7.23±1.096 a11.60±0.79bcd
20012.37±0.51 a8.36±2.45 a8.97±0.25 d7.43±2.57 a10.03±1.86 cd
Leaf021.83±1.61 a17.33±3.34 a23.27±2.0 a17.10±3.3 a23.27±1.14 a
5018.93±0.40ab15.4±1.9 b20.3±1.87ab13.7±1.75ab22.70±0.40 a
10017.73±2.08 b10.7±1.15 c15.13±1.35bc10.70±1.15ab15.4±1.22 b
20012.03±1.50 c9.53±1.15 d11.27±3.35 c9.53±2.04 b15.23±0.10 b
Shoot08.20±0.20 a11.07±0.21 a6.88±0.11 a9.63±2.4 a7.27±0.25 a
507.17±0.31bc7.97±0.41 b6.03±0.15 b7.96±0.42abc6.80±0.26 a
1006.87±0.32 cd5.23±0.25 c6.10±0.2 b6.03±0.15bc6.07±0.31 b
2004.02±0.18 d6.03±0.15 d6.0±0.18 b5.40±0.15 c5.00±0.2 c

Impact of saline treatment (from 2nd to 3rd week) on pigment synthesis (Chla, Chlb, Tot Chl, Carotenoids+xantophylls) at five bread wheat cultivars of Vlora, Albania

CultivarsChla synthesisChlb synthesisTotal ChlCarotenoids xantophylls &Ratio Chla/Chlb
Dajti
Suba
Toborzo
Viktoria
Nogal
eISSN:
2564-615X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Genetics, Biotechnology, Bioinformatics, other