[
Austin, John Langshaw [1961]. “Other Minds”. In Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1979).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bach, Kent [1987]. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baz, Avner [2010]. “Geach’s ‘Refutation’ of Austin revisited”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 41–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blackburn, Simon [1984]. Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blackburn, Simon [1985]. Errors and the phenomenology of value”. In Blackburn, S. Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1993).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brandt, Robert [1955]. “The definition of an ‘ideal observer theory’ in ethics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15: 407–13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Copp, David [1997]. “Belief, reason and motivation: Michael Smith’s The Moral Problem”. Ethics 108: 33–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dreier, Jamie [1990]. “Internalism and speaker relativism”. Ethics 101: 6–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Firth, Robert [1952]. “Ethical Absolutism and the Ideal Observer”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 12: 317–45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geach, Peter [1965]. “Assertion”. Philosophical Review 74: 449–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Genone, James [2014]. “Evidential constraints on singular thought”. Mind & Language 29: 1–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbard, Allan [1990]. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbard, Allan [2003]. Thinking how to Live. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hale, Bob [1993]. “Can there be a logic of attitudes?”. In Reality, Representation, and Projection, edited by J. Haldane and C. Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harman, Gilbert [1977]. “How to use propositions”. American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 173–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeshion, Robin [2010]. “Singular thought: Acquaintance, semantic instrumentalism and cognitivism”. In New Essays on Singular Thought, edited by R. Jeshion. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 105–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplan, David [1989]. “Demonstratives”. In Themes from Kaplan, edited by J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein. New York: Oxford University Press: 481–564.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Körner, Stephen [1966]. Experience and Theory. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mackie, John Leslie [1977]. Ethics. Pelican Books, 2nd edition (1990).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Russell, Bertrand [1911]. “Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 108–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Russell, Bertrand [1952]. Human Society in Ethics and Politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey [1997]. “The metaethical problem”. Ethics 108: 55–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schroeder, Mark [2008]. Being For. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shafer-Landau, Russ [2003]. Moral Realism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silk, Alex [2015]. “How to be an ethical expressivist?”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91: 47–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, Michael [1994]. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strandberg, Caj [2015]. “Can the embedding problem be generalized?’. Acta Analytica 30: 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, Bernard [1981]. “Internal and external reasons”. In Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, Timothy [1994]. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wong, David [1984]. Moral Relativity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
