[
Braddon-Mitchell, David. 2013. “Fighting the zombie of the growing salami”. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 8: 351–61.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Broad, Charlie D. 1923. Scientific Thought London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Correia, Fabrice and Rosenkranz, Sven. 2011. As Time Goes By: Eternal facts in an Ageing Universe. Paderborn/Germany: Mentis Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Correia, Fabrice and Rosenkranz, Sven. 2018. Nothing to Come: a Defence of the Growing Block Theory of Time. Cham/Switzerland: Springer Nature.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Correia, Fabrice and Rosenkranz, Sven. 2020a. “Temporal existence and temporal location”. Philosophical Studies 177: 1999–2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Correia, Fabrice and Rosenkranz, Sven. 2020b. “The formalities of temporaryism without presentness”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 61: 181–202.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deng, Natalja. 2021. “Plenty to come: making sense of Correia’s and Rosenkranz’s growing block”. Disputatio 63: 363–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dorato, Mauro and Hoefer, Carl. 2021. “Nothing to come in a relativistic setting”. Disputatio 63: 373–84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dyke, Heather. 2013: “Time and tense”. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. H. Dyke & A. Bardon (eds.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell: 328–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dyke, Heather. 2021. “Taking tense seriously cannot help the growing block”. Disputatio, 63: 385–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forrest, Peter. 2004. “The real but dead past: a reply to Braddon-Mitchell’. Analysis 64: 358–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horwich, Paul. 1998. Truth, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, David. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markosian, Ned. 2021. “The growing block, the epistemic objection, and zombie parrots”. Disputatio 63: 397–408.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merricks, Trenton. 2006. “Goodbye growing block” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 2: 103–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, Kristie. 2021. “Times, locations, and the epistemic Objection”. Disputatio 63: 409–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Post, John F. 1980. “Infinite regresses of justification and of explanation”. Philosophical Studies 38. 31–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prior, Arthur N. 1970. “The notion of the present”. Studium Generale 23: 245–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sider, Ted. 2001. Four-dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomason, Richmond H. 1970. “Indeterminist time and truth-value gaps”. Theoria 36: 264–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torre, Stephan. 2011. “The open future”. Philosophy Compass 6: 360–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torre, Stephan. 2021. “The growing block, the open future, and future truths”. Disputatio 63: 423–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wawer, Jacek. 2021. “Tensed metaphysics and non-local grounding of truth”. Disputatio 63: 433–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, Timothy. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zimmerman, Dean. 2008. “The privileged present: defending an ‘A-theory’ of time”. In Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. J. Hawthorne, T. Sider, & D. Zimmerman (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell: 211–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
