[
Bell, Clive. 1914. Art. London: Frederick A. Stokes Co.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing. New York: Penguin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bicknell, Jeanette. 2015. Philosophy of Song and Singing: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Black, Max. 1955. “Metaphor”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 54 (1954–5): 273–94.10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carroll, Noël. 2016. “Art appreciation”. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 50(4): 1–14.10.5406/jaesteduc.50.4.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danto, Arthur. 1981. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davidson, Donald. 1978. “What metaphors mean”. Critical Inquiry, 5(1): 31–47.10.1086/447971
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, Stephen. 1991. Definitions of Art. New York: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501721182
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, Stephen. 2012. “On defining music”. The Monist 95(4): 535–5.10.5840/monist201295427
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dickie, George. 1964. “The myth of the aesthetic attitude”. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(1): 56–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gioia, Ted. 2006. Work Songs. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822387688
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodman, Nelson. 1976. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing.10.5040/9781350928541
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kulvicki, John. 2020. Modeling the Meanings of Pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198847472.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson, Jerrold. 2005. “Erotic art and pornographic pictures”. Philosophy and Literature 29(1): 228–40.10.1353/phl.2005.0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson, Jerrold. 1995. “Messages in art”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 73(2): 184–98.10.1080/00048409512346521
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peacocke, Christopher. 2009. “The perception of music: sources of significance”. British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(3): 257–75.10.1093/aesthj/ayp016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Putnam, Hilary. 2004. Ethics Without Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1515/9780674042391
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scruton, Roger. 1997. The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sibley, Frank. 1959. “Aesthetic concepts”. Philosophical Review, 68(4): 421–50.10.2307/2182490
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stein, Gertrude. 1933. The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas. New York: Harcourt Brace.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toorn, Pieter C. van den. 1996. Music, Politics and the Academy. University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vacca & Moore (eds.). 2014. Legacies of Ewan MacColl: The Last Interview. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walton, Kendall. 1970. “Categories of art”. Philosophical Review, 79(3): 334–67.10.2307/2183933
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilde, Oscar. 1905. Intentions: The Decay of Lying, Pen Pencil and Poison, The Critic as Artist. The Truth of Masks. New York: Brentano’s.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, James. 2001. Art and Knowledge. London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zangwill, Nick. 2015. Music and Aesthetic Reality: Formalism and the Limits of Description. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203073797
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zemach, Eddy. 1997. Real Beauty. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
