[Barberousse, A.; Franceschelli, S.; and Imbert, C. 2009. Computer simulations as experiments. Synthese 169: 557–74.10.1007/s11229-008-9430-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Beisbart, C. 2018. Are computer simulations experiments? And if not, how are they related to each other? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8: 171–204.10.1007/s13194-017-0181-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Beisbart, C. 2014. Are we Sims? How computer simulations represent and what this means for the simulation argument. Special issue edited by P. Humphreys of The Monist 97(3): 399–417.10.5840/monist201497325]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertschinger, E. 1998. Simulations of structure formation in the universe. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 36: 599–654.10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.599]Search in Google Scholar
[Bissey, F. et al. 2007. Gluon flux-tube distribution and linear confinement in baryons. Physical Review D 76: 114512.10.1103/PhysRevD.76.114512]Search in Google Scholar
[Brass, P. 2008. Advanced Data Structures. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511800191]Search in Google Scholar
[Chalmers., D. J. 2003. The Matrix as metaphysics. Philosophy section of the official Matrix website, also in Philosophers Explore the Matrix, ed. by C. Grau. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 132–76. 2 more reprints.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chalmers, D. J. 2017. The virtual and the real. Disputatio 9(46): 309–52. Earlier draft under http://consc.net/papers/virtual.pdf10.1515/disp-2017-0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Eklund, M. 2017. Fictionalism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), ed. by E. N. Zalta. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/fictionalism/]Search in Google Scholar
[Godfrey-Smith, P. 2006. The strategy of model-based science. Biology and Philosophy 21(5): 725–40.10.1007/s10539-006-9054-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Grüne-Yanoff, T.; and Weirich, P. 2010. The philosophy and epistemology of simulation: a review. Simulation Gaming 41: 20–50.10.1177/1046878109353470]Search in Google Scholar
[Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814563]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, M. 1998. Virtual Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195104264.003.0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Humphreys, P. 2004. Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientiic Method. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195158709.003.0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kroon, F.; and Voltolini, P. 2017. Fiction. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. by E.N. Zalta. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/fiction/]Search in Google Scholar
[Lopes, D. M. 2001. The ontology of interactive art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 35(4): 65–81.10.2307/3333787]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonnell, N.; and Wildman, N. Virtual reality: digital or fictional? Forthcoming in this issue.]Search in Google Scholar
[Putnam, H. 2002. Ethics Without Ontology. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press]Search in Google Scholar
[Psillos, S. 1999. Scientiic Realism. How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quine, O. v. W. 1948. On what there is. Review of Metaphysics 2: 21–38. Reprinted in his 1953 From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schelling, T. 1969. Models of segregation. American Economic Review 59: 488–93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlesinger, S. et al. 1979. Terminology for model credibility. Simulation 32: 103–4.10.1177/003754977903200304]Search in Google Scholar
[Shapere, D. 1982. The concept of observation in science and philosophy. Philosophy of Science 49: 485–525.10.1086/289075]Search in Google Scholar
[Smuts, A. 2009. What is interactivity? Journal of Aesthetic Education 43(4): 53–73.10.1353/jae.0.0062]Search in Google Scholar
[Suárez, M. 2004. An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science 71: 767–79.10.1086/421415]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, K. L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.10.2307/2108134]Search in Google Scholar
[Weisberg, M. 2007. Who is a modeler? British Journal for Philosophy of Science 58: 207–33.10.1093/bjps/axm011]Search in Google Scholar
[Wildman, N.; and Woodward, R. 2018. Interactivity, fictionality, and incompleteness. In The Aesthetics of Videogames, ed. by G. Tavinor and J. Robson. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315210377-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Winsberg, E. 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winsberg, E. 2001. Simulations, models, and theories: complex physical systems and their representations. Philosophy of Science 68: 442–54.10.1086/392927]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright, C. 1993. Realism: Meaning and Truth. Collected Papers on Semantic Anti-realism, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yablo, S. 2002. Go figure: a path through fictionalism. In Figurative Language, ed. by P.A. French and H. K. Wettstein. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25: 72–102.10.1111/1475-4975.00040]Search in Google Scholar