1. bookVolume 13 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1804-8285
First Published
31 Dec 2010
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Soft Law – The Intermediate Stage Between Freedom and Control

Published Online: 13 Apr 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 13 (2022) - Issue 1 (March 2022)
Page range: 42 - 66
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1804-8285
First Published
31 Dec 2010
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The soft law is placed on a scale between freedom and control, autonomy, and hard law. At first sight, it falls short of building elements known in the legal principles of law, like transparency, certainty, and predictability, but on the other hand, it is needed to address areas where complexity reigns, where flexibility is needed, where hard law is too hard, invasive, and inappropriate to achieve more distant goals. As soft law can have not only practical but also legal effects, this paper analyses the basic elements of soft law, its practice in the US, France, and the EU and gives pro et contra arguments to be able to recognise it as such and to apply it on a more objective manner. This can be done with the help of the manifest error standard of the judiciary, its structure, and the help of participatory collective wisdom. A first step could be the use of the evidentiary standard of manifest error as a possible solution for the most effective soft law (a la “Turing style”), after which the structure and collective wisdom follow. When the principle of loyal cooperation among institutions is established, the soft law hardens more and more into clay and/or hard law. It thus matters who, when, how, and why to enact the soft law.

Keywords

Ackoff, R. L. (1978). The Art of Problem Solving: Accompanied by Ackoff’s Fables. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle. (1998). Politics (C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Search in Google Scholar

Arnull, A. (2018). EU Recommendations and Judicial Review: ECJ 20 February 2018, Case C-16/16 P, Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission. European Constitutional Law Review, 14(3), 609–621.10.1017/S1574019618000251 Search in Google Scholar

Asimow, M. (1985). Nonlegislative Rulemaking and Regulatory Reform. Duke Law Journal, 1985(2), 381–426. JSTOR. Available at https://doi.org/10.2307/1372359.10.2307/1372359 Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, R., Cave, M. and Lodge, M. (2013). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller. Search in Google Scholar

Bevir, M. (Ed.). (2010). The SAGE Handbook of Governance. London: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

Breyer, S. G., Stewart, R. B., Sunstein, C. R. and Vermeule, A. (2006). Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases (6th ed.). New York, NY: Aspen Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Cass, R. A., Diver, C. S., Beermann, J. M. and Freeman, J. (2011). Administrative Law: Cases and Materials (6th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Chapus, R. (1996). Droit administratif général. Paris: Montchrestien. Search in Google Scholar

Coglianese, C. and Mendelson, E. (2012). Meta-Regulation and Self Regulation. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave, and M. Lodge (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (Reprint edition). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Conseil d’Etat. (2013). Etude annuelle 2013 – Le droit souple. Retrieved from http://www.conseil-etat.fr/Decisions-Avis-Publications/Etudes-Publications/Rapports-Etudes/Etudeannuelle-2013-Le-droit-souple. Search in Google Scholar

Creyke, R. and McMillan, J. (2008). Soft Law v Hard Law. In L. Pearson, C. Harlow, and M. Taggert (Eds.). Administrative Law in a Changing State: (pp. 377–406). Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Daillier, P., Quoc, D. N., Müller, D., Pellet, A. and Forteau, M. (2009). Droit international public. Paris: L.G.D.J. Search in Google Scholar

Davis, K. C. (1979). Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry (Fifth printing). Urbana, Chicago, London: University of Illinois Press. Search in Google Scholar

Eagleman, D. (2014). Prikrito. Ljubljana: UMco. Search in Google Scholar

Feltz, B., Crommelinck, M. and Goujon, P. (2006). Self-organization and Emergence in Life Sciences. Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/1-4020-3917-4 Search in Google Scholar

Garner, B. A. (Ed.). (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary (8th edition). St. Paul, MN: Thomson West. Search in Google Scholar

Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P. N. and Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kaufmann, D. and Kraay, A. (2015). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home. Search in Google Scholar

Lagoutte, S., Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. and Cerone, J. (Eds.). (2016). Tracing the Roles of Soft Law in Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198791409.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Landemore, H. and Elster, J. (Eds.). (2012). Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511846427 Search in Google Scholar

Laubadère, A., Venezia, J.-C., and Gaudamet, Z. (1994). Traité de droit administratif (23rd ed.). Paris: Tome. Search in Google Scholar

Maine, H. S. (1936). Ancient Law. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Limited. Search in Google Scholar

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. London: Chelsea Green Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Merriam-Webster. (2016). Definition of CONTROL. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/control. Search in Google Scholar

Orbach, B. (2012). What is Regulation? | The Yale Journal on Regulation. Retrieved January 6, 2015, from http://jreg.commons.yale.edu/what-is-regulation/#return-note-133-1. Search in Google Scholar

Parker, C. (2002). The Open Corporation: Effective Self-regulation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550034 Search in Google Scholar

Pierre, J. and Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Por, G. (1996). The quest for collective intelligence. In K. Gozdz (Ed.). Community Building: Renewing Spirit and Learning in Business. San Francisco: New Leaders Press. Search in Google Scholar

Rahim, M. M. (2013). Legal Regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Regulation Approach of Law for Raising CSR in a Weak Economy. Heidelberg; New York: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-40400-9 Search in Google Scholar

Rosling, H., Rönnlund, A. R. and Rosling, O. (2018). Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World – and Why Things Are Better Than You Think. London: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd. Search in Google Scholar

Segaran, T. (2007). Programming Collective Intelligence: Building Smart Web 2.0 Applications. Beijing; Sebastapol CA: O’Reilly Media. Search in Google Scholar

Selznick, P. (1985). Focusing Organizational Research on Regulation. In R. G. Noll (Ed.). Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences (pp. 363–367). Berkeley: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Senden, L. (2004). Soft Law in European Community Law. Oxford; Portland, Or.: Hart Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Senge, P. M. (2010). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization. New York: Crown Publishing Group. Search in Google Scholar

Senn, M. (2014). Non-State Regulatory Regimes: Understanding Institutional Transformation. Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Simon, F. C. (2017). Meta-Regulation in Practice: Beyond Normative Views of Morality and Rationality. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315308913 Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, F. (1994). Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community. In S. Martin (Ed.). The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (pp. 197–225). Dortrecht; Boston; Springer Science & Business Media. Search in Google Scholar

Sossin, L. (2004). The Rule of Policy: Baker and the Impact of Judicial Review on Administrative Discretion. In D. Dyzenhaus (Ed.). The Unity of Public Law (pp. 87–112). Oxford; Portland, Or.: Hart Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Sossin, L. and Smith, C. W. (2003). Hard Choices and Soft Law: Ethical Codes, Policy Guidelines and the Role of the Courts in Regulating Government. Alberta Law Review, 40, 867–893. Search in Google Scholar

¸Stefan, O. A. (2008). European Competition Soft Law in European Courts: A Matter of Hard Principles? European Law Journal, 14(6), 753–772. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00443.x.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00443.x Search in Google Scholar

Sueur, A. L., Herbert, J. and English, R. (1999). Principles of Public Law. London, Sydney: Cavendish.10.4324/9781843140351 Search in Google Scholar

Sulev, G. (2021). Soft Law in EU Electronic Communications Regulation: A Bulgarian Case Study. European Papers – A Journal on Law and Integration, 5(3), 1555–1564. Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400884711 Search in Google Scholar

Taleb, N. N. (2010). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable Fragility (Kindle Edition). New York: Random House Publishing Group. Search in Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (2006). Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? New Yersey: Princeton University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. and Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction (Kindle edition). London: Random House. Search in Google Scholar

Thürer, D. (1985). ‘Soft law’ – Eine neue Form von Völkerrecht? In 104. Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht (pp. 429–453). Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn. Search in Google Scholar

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, (49).10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433 Search in Google Scholar

Waline, J. (2010). Droit administratif. Paris: Dalloz. Search in Google Scholar

Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N. and Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688. Available at https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147.10.1126/science.1193147 Search in Google Scholar

Wyman, B. (1903). The Principles of the Administrative Law Governing the Relations of Public Officers. St. Paul, MN: Keefe-Davidson Company. Search in Google Scholar

Zimbardo, P. G. (2008). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo