Morphological Changes of Ureteropelvic Junction (UPJ) in Case of Congenital Hydronephrosis – Review of Literature

1. Abbott BD, Birnbaum LS, Pratt RM. TCDD-induced hyperplasia of the ureteral epithelium producēs hydronephrosis in murine fetuses // Teratology, 1987; 35:329 - 334Search in Google Scholar

2. Apoznanski W, Koleda P, Wozniak Z, et al. The distribution of interstitial cells if Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction // Int Urol Hephrol, 2013; 45(30):607 - 12Search in Google Scholar

3. Baumgart P, Muller KM, Lison AE. Epithelial abnormalities in the renal pelvis in experimental hydronephrosis and pyelonephritis // Pathol Res Pract, 1983; 176:185 - 195Search in Google Scholar

4. Caine M, Hermann G. The return of peristalsis in the anastomosed ureter: A cine-radiographic study // Br J Urol, 1970; 42;16410.1111/j.1464-410X.1970.tb10017.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Carrera N, Parente A, Rivas S, Romero R, Angulo JM. Cold-knife retrograde endoscopic endopyelotomy (Cutting-Balloon) in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: early results // Cir Pediatr. 2011; 24(4): 192 - 5Search in Google Scholar

6. Chertin B. Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction // In: Puri P, Hollwarth M. Pediatric surgery: Diagnosis and management. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2009; 839 - 842Search in Google Scholar

7. Chiou YY, Shien CC, Cheng HL, et al. Intrinsisc expression of Th2 cytokines in urothelium of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction // Kidney Int, 2005; 67:638 - 646Search in Google Scholar

8. Constantinou CE, Granato JJ, Govan DE. Dynamics of upper urinary tract: V-Accommodation in the rate and stroke volumes of ureteral peristalsis as a responses to transient alteration in urine flow rate // Invest Urol, 1979; 29:249 - 264Search in Google Scholar

9. Constantinou CE, Hrynczuk JR. Urodinamics of upper urinary tract // Invest Urol, 1976; 14:233 -240Search in Google Scholar

10. Cutroneo G, Arena S, Anastasi G, et al. Altered cytoskeletal structure of smooth muscle cells in ureteropelvic junction obstruction // J Urol, 2011; 185(6):2314 - 9Search in Google Scholar

11. DiBona GF, Kopp UC. Neural control of renal function // Physiol Rev,1997; 77:75 - 19710.1152/physrev.1997.77.1.75Search in Google Scholar

12. Dilatation of the upper urinary tract (ureteropelvic junction and ureterovesical junction obstruction) // Paediatric urology guidelines,2012; 58 - 61Search in Google Scholar

13. Dong SK, Ji YJ, Hyeon JJ, et al. Elastin content of the renal pelvis and ureter determines postpyeloplasty recovery // J Urol, 2005; 173:962 - 966Search in Google Scholar

14. Eden, G.H.: Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results. Eur. Urology, 2007; 52: 983-989Search in Google Scholar

15. Eken A, Erdogan S, Kuyucu Y, et al. Immunohistochemical and electron microscopic examination of Cajal cells in ureteropelvic junction obstruction // Can Urol Assoc J, 2012, 10:1 - 610.5489/cuaj.11293Search in Google Scholar

16. Exintaris B, Klemm MF, Lang RG. Spontaneus slow wave and contractile activity of the guinea pig prostate // J Urol, 2002; 168:315Search in Google Scholar

17. Feng C. Genetic and developmental basis for urinary tract obstruction // Pediatr Nephrol, 2009; 24:1621 - 1632Search in Google Scholar

18. Golenhofen K, Hannappel J. Normal spontaneus activityof the pueloureteral system in the guineapig // Pflugers Arch,1973; 341:257 - 27010.1007/BF00592794Search in Google Scholar

19. Gould SW, Figueroa TE, Robinson BW, Reichard KW, Recent advances in the prenatal diagnosis and subsequent managenent of congenital anomalies // The Journal of Lancaster General Hospital, 2011; 6(1): 5 - 9Search in Google Scholar

20. Hosgor M, Karaca I, Ulukus C, et al. Structural changes of smooth muscle in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction // J Pediatr Surg, 2005; 40(10): 1632 - 6Search in Google Scholar

21. Kajbafzadeh AM, Payabvash S, Salmasi AH, et al. Smooth muscle cell apoptosis and neural development in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction // J Urol,2007; 176(2):718 - 2310.1016/j.juro.2006.03.041Search in Google Scholar

22. Kaya C, Bogaert G, de Ridder D, et al. Extracellular matrix degradation and reduced neural density in children with instrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction // J Urol, 2010; 76(1):185 - 9Search in Google Scholar

23. Koleda P, Apoznanski W, Wozniak Z, et al. Changes in interstitial cell of Cajal-like cells density in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction // Int Urol Nephrol, 2012; 44(1):7 - 12Search in Google Scholar

24. Lang RG, Davidson ME, Exintaris B. Pyeloureteral motility and ureteral peristalsis: esential role of sensory nerves and endogenus prostaglandīns // Exp Physiol, 2002; 87:129 - 146Search in Google Scholar

25. Lang RJ, Exintaris B, Teele ME, et al. Electrical basis of peristalsis in the mammalian upper urinary tract // Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 1998; 25:310 - 321Search in Google Scholar

26. Lang RJ, Klemm MF. Interstitial cell of Cajal-like cells in the upper urinary tract // J Cell Mol Med, 2005; 9:543 - 556Search in Google Scholar

27. Lang RJ, Takano H, Davidson ME, et al. Characterization of the spontaneus electrical and contractile activity of smooth muscle cells in the rat upper tract // J Urol,2001; 166:329 - 33410.1016/S0022-5347(05)66154-XSearch in Google Scholar

28. Lang RJ, Tonta MA, Zoltkowski BZ, et al. Pyeloureteric peristalsis: role of atypical smooth muscle cells and intersticial cells of Cajal-like cells as pacemarkers // J Physiol, 2006; 576:695 - 705Search in Google Scholar

29. Lang RJ, Zoltkowski BZ, Hammer JM, et al. Electrical characterization of interstitial cells of Cajal-like cells and smooth muscle cells isolated from the mouse ureteropelvic junction // J Urol, 2007; 177(4): 1573 - 80Search in Google Scholar

30. Magno C, Arena S, Speciale F, et al. Integrin expression of smooth muscle cells in ureteropelvic junction obstruction // Ital J of Anat and Embryol, 2010; 115, n1/2 (Supplement)Search in Google Scholar

31. McCloskey KD, Gurney AM. Kit positive cells in the guinea pig bladder // J Urol, 2002; 168:832Search in Google Scholar

32. Murakamo M, Nonomura K, Yamashita T, et al. Structural changes of collagen components and diminuation of nerves in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction // J Urol, 1997; 157(5):1963 - 8Search in Google Scholar

33. Nadu A, Mottrie A, Geavlete P. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Which surgical approach? // European Urology Supplements, 2009; 8: 778 - 781Search in Google Scholar

34. Osman F, George L, et al. A novel videomicroscopic technique for studying rat ureteral peristalsis in vivo // World J Urol, 2008; 27(2):265 - 70Search in Google Scholar

35. Osman F, Romics O, Nyrady P, et al. Ureteral motility // Acta Phys Hung, 2009; 96(4):407 - 426Search in Google Scholar

36. Parente A, Angulo JM, Rivas S, Romero RM, Corona C, Tardaguila A. Percutaneous endopyelotomy with electrocautery: modified techniques in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a child under 2 years // Arch Esp Urol, 2012; 65(9): 837 - 40Search in Google Scholar

37. Parente Hernandez A, Angulo Madero JM, Romero Ruiz RM, Rivas Vila S, Lain Fernandez A, Fanjul Gomez M. Medium-term results of the endourological management with balloon dilatation of the ureteropelvic junction stenosis in infants // Actas Urol Esp, 2009;33(4):422-8Search in Google Scholar

38. Rosen S, Peters CA, Chevalier RL, et al. The kidney in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a spectrum from normal to nephrectomy // J Urol, 2008; 179:1257 - 63Search in Google Scholar

39. Sanders KM. A case of interstitial cells of Cajal as pacemakers and mediators of neurotransmission in the gastrointestinal tract // Gastroenerology, 1996; 111: 492Search in Google Scholar

40. Santicoli P, Maggi CA. Myogenic and neurogenic factors in the control of pyeloureteral motility and ureteral peristalsis // Pharmacol Rev,1998; 50:683 -721Search in Google Scholar

41. Seki N, Suzuki H. Electrical properties of smooth muscle cell membrane in renal pelvis of rabbits // Am J Phys, 1990; 259:F888 - F89410.1152/ajprenal.1990.259.6.F8882260681Search in Google Scholar

42. Sokolis DP. Identification and characterisation of regional variation in the material properties of ureter according to microstructure // Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2013; 2510.1080/10255842.2012.76169223439210Search in Google Scholar

43. Solari V, Piotrowska P, Puri P. Altered expression of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction // J Urol. 2003; 170:2420 -2422Search in Google Scholar

44. Tahara H. The three dimensional structure of the musculature and the nerve elements in the rabbit ureter // J Anat, 1990; 170:183 - 191Search in Google Scholar

45. Wilkinson AG, Rajan P, MacKinlay GA. Endoluminal balloon dilatation for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children: an effective alternative to open pyeloplasty // J Pediatr Urol, 2005; 1(4): 301 - 5Search in Google Scholar

46. Woodward M, Frank D. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis // BJU Int, 2002; 89:149 - 156Search in Google Scholar

47. Yang X, Zhang Y, Hu J. The expression of Cajal cells at the obstruction site of congenital pelviureteric junction obstruction and quantitative image analysis // J Pediatr Surg, 2009; 44(12):2339 - 42 Search in Google Scholar