Readiness Toward the Implementation of Open Science Initiatives In the Republic of Moldova

Abdullahi, K.A., & Noorhidawati, A. (2021). Attributes that influence academics’ data sharing in Nigeria: the effects of organization culture. Information Research, 26(3), paper 908. https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper908 AbdullahiK.A. NoorhidawatiA. 2021 Attributes that influence academics’ data sharing in Nigeria: the effects of organization culture Information Research 26 3 paper 908. https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper908 Search in Google Scholar

Adams, W.C. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. In K.E. Newcomer, H.P. Hatry, J.S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 492–505). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19 AdamsW.C. 2015 Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews In NewcomerK.E. HatryH.P. WholeyJ.S. (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation 492 505 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19 Search in Google Scholar

Bazeley, P. (2012). Integrative Analysis Strategies for Mixed Data Sources. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426330 BazeleyP. 2012 Integrative Analysis Strategies for Mixed Data Sources American Behavioral Scientist 56 6 814 828 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426330 Search in Google Scholar

Bernardi, L., Keim, S., & von der Lippe, H. (2007). Social Influences on Fertility: A Comparative Mixed Methods Study. In Eastern and Western Germany. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292238 BernardiL. KeimS. von der LippeH. 2007 Social Influences on Fertility: A Comparative Mixed Methods Study. In Eastern and Western Germany Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 1 23 47 https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292238 Search in Google Scholar

Boulton, G.S. (2021). Science as a Global Public Good (2^nd ed.). International Science Council Position Paper. https://council.science/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Science-as-a-global-public-good_v041021.pdf BoultonG.S. 2021 Science as a Global Public Good 2nd ed. International Science Council Position Paper https://council.science/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Science-as-a-global-public-good_v041021.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Brannen, J. (2005). Mixing Methods: The Entry of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches into the Research Process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500154642 BrannenJ. 2005 Mixing Methods: The Entry of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches into the Research Process International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 3 173 184 https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500154642 Search in Google Scholar

Čehovin, G., Bosnjak, M., & Lozar Manfreda, K. (2022). Item Nonresponse in Web Versus Other Survey Modes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Social Science Computer Review, First published online February 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211056229 ČehovinG. BosnjakM. Lozar ManfredaK. 2022 Item Nonresponse in Web Versus Other Survey Modes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Social Science Computer Review First published online February 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211056229 Search in Google Scholar

Cheradi, N., Țurcan, N., Dobrea, O., Lupu, V., & Silivestru, D. (2023). Benchmarking of institutional Open Access policies and assessment of their readiness in adopting an Open Science Policy [Analiza şi benchmarking privind politicile instituţionale de Acces Deschis şi evaluarea pregătirii pentru implementarea politicilor de Ştiinţa Deschisă]: Deliverable SD-24082 (Final version). Information Society Development Institute. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7501956 [In Romanian] CheradiN. ȚurcanN. DobreaO. LupuV. SilivestruD. 2023 Benchmarking of institutional Open Access policies and assessment of their readiness in adopting an Open Science Policy [Analiza şi benchmarking privind politicile instituţionale de Acces Deschis şi evaluarea pregătirii pentru implementarea politicilor de Ştiinţa Deschisă]: Deliverable SD-24082 (Final version) Information Society Development Institute https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7501956 [In Romanian] Search in Google Scholar

Cook-Deegan, R., Ankeny, R.A., & Maxson Jones, K. (2017). Sharing Data to Build a Medical Information Commons: From Bermuda to the Global Alliance. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet., 18, 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022515 Cook-DeeganR. AnkenyR.A. Maxson JonesK. 2017 Sharing Data to Build a Medical Information Commons: From Bermuda to the Global Alliance Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 18 389 415 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022515 Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J.W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE. CreswellJ.W. 2015 A concise introduction to mixed methods research SAGE Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3^rd ed.). SAGE. CreswellJ.W. Plano ClarkV.L. 2018 Designing and conducting mixed methods research 3rd ed. SAGE Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (4^th ed.). SAGE. CreswellJ.W. PothC.N. 2018 Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches 4th ed. SAGE Search in Google Scholar

Dahlin, E. (2021). Email Interviews: A Guide to Research Design and Implementation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211025453 DahlinE. 2021 Email Interviews: A Guide to Research Design and Implementation International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211025453 Search in Google Scholar

Daikeler, J., Bošnjak, M., & Lozar Manfreda, K. (2020). Web Versus Other Survey Modes: An Updated and Extended Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8(3), 513–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz008 DaikelerJ. BošnjakM. Lozar ManfredaK. 2020 Web Versus Other Survey Modes: An Updated and Extended Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8 3 513 539 https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz008 Search in Google Scholar

DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L.M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), e000057. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057 DeJonckheereM. VaughnL.M. 2019 Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour Family Medicine and Community Health 7 2 e000057 https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057 Search in Google Scholar

Denscombe, M. (2009). Item non-response rates: a comparison of online and paper questionnaires. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802054706 DenscombeM. 2009 Item non-response rates: a comparison of online and paper questionnaires International Journal of Social Research Methodology 12 4 281 291 https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802054706 Search in Google Scholar

Doyle, L., Brady, A.-M., & Byrne, G. (2016). An overview of mixed methods research – revisited. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(8), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987116674257 DoyleL. BradyA.-M. ByrneG. 2016 An overview of mixed methods research – revisited Journal of Research in Nursing 21 8 623 635 https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987116674257 Search in Google Scholar

EUA. (2022, February 3). The EUA Open Science Agenda 2025. European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/1003:the-eua-open-science-agenda-2025.html EUA 2022 February 3 The EUA Open Science Agenda 2025 European University Association https://eua.eu/resources/publications/1003:the-eua-open-science-agenda-2025.html Search in Google Scholar

EUA. (n.d). Open Science. European University Association. https://eua.eu/issues/21:open-science.html EUA (n.d). Open Science European University Association https://eua.eu/issues/21:open-science.html Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2020) The EU's open science policy. European Commission Research and Innovation. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/our-digital-future/open-science_en European Commission 2020 The EU's open science policy European Commission Research and Innovation https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/our-digital-future/open-science_en Search in Google Scholar

Fritz, R.L., & Vandermause, R. (2018). Data Collection via In-Depth Email Interviewing: Lessons From the Field. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316689067 FritzR.L. VandermauseR. 2018 Data Collection via In-Depth Email Interviewing: Lessons From the Field Qualitative Health Research 28 10 1640 1649 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316689067 Search in Google Scholar

Gewin, V. (2016). Data sharing: An open mind on open data. Nature, 529, 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7584-117a GewinV. 2016 Data sharing: An open mind on open data Nature 529 117 119 https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7584-117a Search in Google Scholar

Gong, K. (2022). Open science: The science paradigm of the new era. Cultures of Science, 5(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083221091867 GongK. 2022 Open science: The science paradigm of the new era Cultures of Science 5 1 3 9 https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083221091867 Search in Google Scholar

Government of the Republic of Moldova. (2019). Methodology for financing of projects in the field of research and innovation [Metodologia de finanţare a proiectelor din domeniul cercetării şi inovării]. Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 16 august, nr. 256–259, Modificat: HG 267 din 20.10.21, MO256-260/22.10.21 art. 520; în vigoare 22.11.21. https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=128339&lang=ro# [In Romanian] Government of the Republic of Moldova 2019 Methodology for financing of projects in the field of research and innovation [Metodologia de finanţare a proiectelor din domeniul cercetării şi inovării] Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova 16 august 256 259 Modificat: HG 267 din 20.10.21, MO256-260/22.10.21 art. 520; în vigoare 22.11.21. https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=128339&lang=ro# [In Romanian] Search in Google Scholar

Government of the Republic of Moldova. (2018, November 8). National Roadmap for the integration of the Republic of Moldova into the European Research Area for the years 2019–2021 [Foaia naţională de parcurs pentru integrarea Republicii Moldova în Spaţiul european de cercetare pe anii 2019–2021]: Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1081 din 08-11-2018. Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 11 ianuarie, nr. 6–12, art. 02. https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=111352&lang=ro [In Romanian] Government of the Republic of Moldova 2018 November 8 National Roadmap for the integration of the Republic of Moldova into the European Research Area for the years 2019–2021 [Foaia naţională de parcurs pentru integrarea Republicii Moldova în Spaţiul european de cercetare pe anii 2019–2021]: Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1081 din 08-11-2018 Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova 11 ianuarie 6 12 art. 02. https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=111352&lang=ro [In Romanian] Search in Google Scholar

Hamilton, R.J., & Bowers, B.J. (2006). Internet Recruitment and E-Mail Interviews in Qualitative Studies. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287599 HamiltonR.J. BowersB.J. 2006 Internet Recruitment and E-Mail Interviews in Qualitative Studies Qualitative Health Research 16 6 821 835 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287599 Search in Google Scholar

Hands, A.S. (2022). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research: An illustration. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.10645 HandsA.S. 2022 Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research: An illustration The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 45 1 1 20 https://doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.10645 Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, R.L., & Reilly, T.M. (2011). Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research, 14(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751111099300 HarrisonR.L. ReillyT.M. 2011 Mixed methods designs in marketing research Qualitative Market Research 14 1 7 26 https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751111099300 Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. (2018). The Practical Utility and Suitability of Email Interviews in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 23(2), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3266 HawkinsJ. 2018 The Practical Utility and Suitability of Email Interviews in Qualitative Research The Qualitative Report 23 2 493 501 https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3266 Search in Google Scholar

Heise, C., & Pearce, J.M. (2020). From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020915900 HeiseC. PearceJ.M. 2020 From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication SAGE Open 10 2 https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020915900 Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, N., & McHale, S. (2007). A Practical Guide to the E-Mail Interview. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1415–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308761 HuntN. McHaleS. 2007 A Practical Guide to the E-Mail Interview Qualitative Health Research 17 10 1415 1421 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308761 Search in Google Scholar

IDSI. (2022, December 7). Registry of recognized national scientific journals of the Republic of Moldova. Instrumentul Bibliometric Naţional. https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/registru IDSI 2022 December 7 Registry of recognized national scientific journals of the Republic of Moldova Instrumentul Bibliometric Naţional https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/registru Search in Google Scholar

IDSI. (n.d.). Gateway to national digital repositories in the Republic of Moldova. Instrumentul Bibliometric National. https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/poarta-de-acces-colectii-digitale-din-RM IDSI (n.d.). Gateway to national digital repositories in the Republic of Moldova Instrumentul Bibliometric National https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/poarta-de-acces-colectii-digitale-din-RM Search in Google Scholar

ISC. (2021). Opening the record of science: making scholarly publishing work for science in the digital era. International Science Council. https://doi.org/10.24948/2021.01 ISC 2021 Opening the record of science: making scholarly publishing work for science in the digital era International Science Council https://doi.org/10.24948/2021.01 Search in Google Scholar

Ivankova, N.V., Creswell, J.W., & Stick, S.L. (2006). Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260 IvankovaN.V. CreswellJ.W. StickS.L. 2006 Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice Field Methods 18 1 3 20 https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260 Search in Google Scholar

Jeanty, G., & Hibel, J. (2014). Mixed Methods Research of Adult Family Care Home Residents and Informal Caregivers. The Qualitative Report, 16(3), 635–656. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1081 JeantyG. HibelJ. 2014 Mixed Methods Research of Adult Family Care Home Residents and Informal Caregivers The Qualitative Report 16 3 635 656 https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1081 Search in Google Scholar

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 KrejcieR.V. MorganD.W. 1970 Determining Sample Size for Research Activities Educational and Psychological Measurement 30 3 607 610 https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 Search in Google Scholar

Lacey, J., Coates, R., & Herington, M. (2020). Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1800969 LaceyJ. CoatesR. HeringtonM. 2020 Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 3 427 449 https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1800969 Search in Google Scholar

Lasthiotakis, H., Kretz, A., & Sá, C. (2015). Open science strategies in research policies: A comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK. Policy Futures in Education, 13(8), 968–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315579983 LasthiotakisH. KretzA. SáC. 2015 Open science strategies in research policies: A comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK Policy Futures in Education 13 8 968 989 https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315579983 Search in Google Scholar

Levin, N., Leonelli, S., Weckowska, D., Castle, D., & Dupré, J. (2016). How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616668760 LevinN. LeonelliS. WeckowskaD. CastleD. DupréJ. 2016 How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 36 2 128 141 https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616668760 Search in Google Scholar

Maddi, A., Lardreau, E., Sapinho, D., 2021. Open access in Europe: a national and regional comparison. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3131–3152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03887-1 MaddiA. LardreauE. SapinhoD. 2021 Open access in Europe: a national and regional comparison Scientometrics 126 4 3131 3152 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03887-1 Search in Google Scholar

Manco, A. (2022). A Landscape of Open Science Policies Research. SAGE Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221140358 MancoA. 2022 A Landscape of Open Science Policies Research SAGE Open 12 4 https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221140358 Search in Google Scholar

McKim, C.A. (2017). The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096 McKimC.A. 2017 The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 2 202 222 https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096 Search in Google Scholar

Meho, L.I. (2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1284–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416 MehoL.I. 2006 E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 10 1284 1295 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416 Search in Google Scholar

Morais, R., & Borrell-Damian, L. (2019). 2017–2018 EUA Open Access Survey Results. European University Association. https://eua.eu/component/publications/publications.html?id=826:2017-2018-eua-open-access-survey-results MoraisR. Borrell-DamianL. 2019 2017–2018 EUA Open Access Survey Results European University Association https://eua.eu/component/publications/publications.html?id=826:2017-2018-eua-open-access-survey-results Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, D.L. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462 MorganD.L. 2007 Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 1 48 76 https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462 Search in Google Scholar

Morris, A. (2015). A practical introduction to in-depth interviewing. SAGE. MorrisA. 2015 A practical introduction to in-depth interviewing SAGE Search in Google Scholar

O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Integration and Publications as Indicators of “Yield” From Mixed Methods Studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806299094 O’CathainA. MurphyE. NichollJ. 2007 Integration and Publications as Indicators of “Yield” From Mixed Methods Studies Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 2 147 163 https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806299094 Search in Google Scholar

O’Hanlon, R., McSweeney, J., & Stabler, S. (2020). Publishing habits and perceptions of open access publishing and public access amongst clinical and research fellows. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.751 O’HanlonR. McSweeneyJ. StablerS. 2020 Publishing habits and perceptions of open access publishing and public access amongst clinical and research fellows Journal of the Medical Library Association 108 1 47 58 https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.751 Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2020). Enhanced Access to Publicly Funded Data for Science, Technology and Innovation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/947717bc-en OECD 2020 Enhanced Access to Publicly Funded Data for Science, Technology and Innovation OECD Publishing https://doi.org/10.1787/947717bc-en Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2022). Recommendation of the Council concerning Access to Research Data from Public Funding. OECD/LEGAL/0347. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0347 OECD 2022 Recommendation of the Council concerning Access to Research Data from Public Funding OECD/LEGAL/0347 https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0347 Search in Google Scholar

Oltmann, S. (2016). Qualitative Interviews: A Methodological Discussion of the Interviewer and Respondent Contexts. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), art. 15. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-17.2.2551 OltmannS. 2016 Qualitative Interviews: A Methodological Discussion of the Interviewer and Respondent Contexts Forum: Qualitative Social Research 17 2 art. 15. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-17.2.2551 Search in Google Scholar

Ostaszewski, M. (2014). Analysis of the attitude within academic and research communities toward open science -- a quantitative survey. Conference Opening Science to Meet Future Challenges, Warsaw, March 11, 2014. Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw. https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/3719 OstaszewskiM. 2014 Analysis of the attitude within academic and research communities toward open science -- a quantitative survey Conference Opening Science to Meet Future Challenges Warsaw March 11, 2014 Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/3719 Search in Google Scholar

Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., & Rowa-Dewar, N. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005 ÖstlundU. KiddL. WengströmY. Rowa-DewarN. 2011 Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review International Journal of Nursing Studies 48 3 369 383 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005 Search in Google Scholar

Pardo Martínez, C., & Poveda, A. (2018). Knowledge and Perceptions of Open Science among Researchers — A Case Study for Colombia. Information, 9(11), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9110292 Pardo MartínezC. PovedaA. 2018 Knowledge and Perceptions of Open Science among Researchers — A Case Study for Colombia Information 9 11 292 https://doi.org/10.3390/info9110292 Search in Google Scholar

Qu, S.Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), 238–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111162070 QuS.Q. DumayJ. 2011 The qualitative research interview Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 8 3 238 264 https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111162070 Search in Google Scholar

Santos, J.L.G. dos, Erdmann, A.L., Meirelles, B.H.S., Lanzoni, G.M. de M., Cunha, V.P. da, & Ross, R. (2017). Integração entre dados quantitativos e qualitativos em uma pesquisa de métodos mistos. Texto contexto – enferm, 26(3), e1590016. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017001590016 SantosJ.L.G. dos ErdmannA.L. MeirellesB.H.S. LanzoniG.M. de M. CunhaV.P. da RossR. 2017 Integração entre dados quantitativos e qualitativos em uma pesquisa de métodos mistos Texto contexto – enferm 26 3 e1590016 https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017001590016 Search in Google Scholar

Schöpfel, J., Ferrant, C., André, F., & Fabre, R. (2016). Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS). Interlending & Document Supply, 44(4), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILDS-06-2016-0023 SchöpfelJ. FerrantC. AndréF. FabreR. 2016 Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS) Interlending & Document Supply 44 4 141 149 https://doi.org/10.1108/ILDS-06-2016-0023 Search in Google Scholar

Shmagun, H., Shim, J., Choi, K.-N., Shin, S.K., Kim, J., & Oppenheim, C. (2022). Korea's national approach to Open Science: Present and possible future. Journal of Information Science, First published online July 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221107336 ShmagunH. ShimJ. ChoiK.-N. ShinS.K. KimJ. OppenheimC. 2022 Korea's national approach to Open Science: Present and possible future Journal of Information Science First published online July 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221107336 Search in Google Scholar

Stentz, J.E., Plano Clark, V.L., & Matkin, G.S. (2012). Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001 StentzJ.E. Plano ClarkV.L. MatkinG.S. 2012 Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices The Leadership Quarterly 23 6 1173 1183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001 Search in Google Scholar

Toli, E., Papadopoulou, E., Liatas, C., Sifakaki, E., Papastamatiou, I., & Prnjat, O. (2020). NI4OS-Europe National OSC initiatives models: Deliverable D2.2. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4061801 ToliE. PapadopoulouE. LiatasC. SifakakiE. PapastamatiouI. PrnjatO. 2020 NI4OS-Europe National OSC initiatives models: Deliverable D2.2 https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4061801 Search in Google Scholar

Țurcan, N., Cojocaru, I. (2022). Open Science agenda in the Republic of Moldova: national policies and actions [Agenda Ştiinţei Deschise în Republica Moldova: politici şi acţiuni naţionale]. In: Open Science in the Republic of Moldova. 2^nd edition, October 27–28, 2022, Chişinău. Chişinău: “Print-Caro” SRL, 13–60. https://doi.org/10.57066/sdrm22.01 [In Romanian] ȚurcanN. CojocaruI. 2022 Open Science agenda in the Republic of Moldova: national policies and actions [Agenda Ştiinţei Deschise în Republica Moldova: politici şi acţiuni naţionale] In: Open Science in the Republic of Moldova 2nd edition October 27–28 2022 Chişinău Chişinău: “Print-Caro” SRL, 13–60. https://doi.org/10.57066/sdrm22.01 [In Romanian] Search in Google Scholar

Țurcan, N., Cuciureanu, G., Cujba, R., Lupu, V., Cheradi, N., & Cojocaru, I. (2022). Perception of Open Science in the Scientific Community of the Republic of Moldova. Postmodern Openings, 13(4), 294–334. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/519 ȚurcanN. CuciureanuG. CujbaR. LupuV. CheradiN. CojocaruI. 2022 Perception of Open Science in the Scientific Community of the Republic of Moldova Postmodern Openings 13 4 294 334 https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/519 Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en UNESCO 2021 UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science UNESCO Digital Library https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. (2022). Developing policies for open science. UNESCO Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.54677/VHNY8608 UNESCO 2022 Developing policies for open science UNESCO Digital Library https://doi.org/10.54677/VHNY8608 Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. (n.d.). Global Open Science Partnership. https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/partnership UNESCO (n.d.). Global Open Science Partnership https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/partnership Search in Google Scholar

Vicente, P., & Reis, E. (2010). Using Questionnaire Design to Fight Nonresponse Bias in Web Surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 28(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439309340751 VicenteP. ReisE. 2010 Using Questionnaire Design to Fight Nonresponse Bias in Web Surveys Social Science Computer Review 28 2 251 267 https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439309340751 Search in Google Scholar

Walker, C., & Baxter, J. (2019). Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919834379 WalkerC. BaxterJ. 2019 Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919834379 Search in Google Scholar