1. bookVolume 12 (2018): Issue 2 (December 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1802-4866
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Technology Roadmaps, Innovation Journeys, and Nanoworld: A Spatio-temporal Consolidation of the EC Nanotechnology Policy

Published Online: 01 Feb 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 12 (2018) - Issue 2 (December 2018)
Page range: 34 - 49
Received: 23 Jan 2017
Accepted: 24 May 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1802-4866
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Technology roadmaps have become an essential part of the European Commission’s (EC) nanotechnology policy strategies. They represent socio-technical landscapes and evolving pathways, suggesting the underlying or otherwise supportive metaphorical patterns and narrative structures. For the same reason, however, roadmaps are problematic assemblages: they can simplify and distort reality, and filter things that don’t fit. The presented study combines cognitive linguistics with narratology to scrutinise the European Commission’s nanotechnology roadmapping as a discursive formation. It targets the systematic metaphors in approximately two-hundred news and reports on nanotechnology, compiled ad hoc from the CORDIS database (between the years 1999–2015). It is argued that the identified metaphors correspond to a discourse topology of ‘locations’, ‘events’, and their structures, especially as regards to the dilemma of ‘path dependence’, overcoming ‘knowledge gaps’, and reaching ‘nanoworld’. These are accompanied by a narrative climax of developing mature science policy model, in the arrangement of actions and roles for the European governments, science (nanotechnology), policy, and the public. The study demonstrates how systematic metaphors engage all the actors in the narrative of ‘innovation journey’ to form stabilised structures of meaning, that is, spatio-temporal consolidation of nanotechnology policy. It is imperative to continuously assess the context of such consolidation, being less overt but not necessarily less effective, in privileging some meanings, interests, and practices over the others, thereby excluding other political alternatives.

Keywords

Amato, I. (1999). Nanotechnology – Shaping the World Atom by Atom. National Science and Technology Council, Washington: Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Åm, Heidrun. (2013). ‘Don’t make nanotechnology sexy, ensure its benefits, and be neutral’: Studying the logics of new intermediary institutions in ambiguous governance contexts. Science and Public Policy. vol. 40 (4), 466–478.10.1093/scipol/sct054Search in Google Scholar

Barker, D. and Smith, D.J.H. (1995). Technology Foresight Using Roadmaps. Long Range Planning, 28(2), 21–28.10.1016/0024-6301(95)98586-HSearch in Google Scholar

Berker, T., and Throndsen, W. (2017). Planning story lines in smart grid road maps (2010–2014): three types of maps for coordinated time travel, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(2), 214–228.10.1080/1523908X.2016.1207159Search in Google Scholar

Brown, N., and Michael, M. (2003). A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(1), 3–18.10.1080/0953732032000046024Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalizing Metaphor for Applied Linguistic Research. In L. Cameron and G. Low (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 3–28), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, J. (1949). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. 3rd ed. Novato, Calif: New World Library.Search in Google Scholar

Ceccarelli, L. (2013). On the Frontier of Science: An American Rhetoric of Exploration and Exploitation (Michigan State UP, 2013).10.14321/j.ctt7zt5wpSearch in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230000612Search in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230319899Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, P.A. and Ilyin, M. (1993). Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’. Discourse and Society, 4(1), 7–31.10.1177/0957926593004001002Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, P. A. and Schäffner, C. (2002). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.4Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, P. A. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crichton, M. (2003). Prey. New York: HarperCollins.Search in Google Scholar

Edgerton, D. (2006). The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

ETC Group. (2005). Special Report – NanoGeoPolitics: ETC Group Surveys the Political Landscape NanoGeoPolitics. ETC Group Special Report – Communiqué, July/August 2005, No. 89.Search in Google Scholar

EuroBarometer. (2010). Biotechnology Report. Special Eurobarometer 341 / Wave 73.1 – TNS Opinion & Social. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_en.pdf (August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (1995). Green Paper on Innovation. Commission of the European Communities. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2004). Communication from the Commission – Towards a European strategy for nanotechnology. Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. URL: https://cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nano_com_en_new.pdf (August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2005). Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005–2009. Community Research and Development Information Service. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2006). Exploring the Nano-World: Leading EU Research in Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies. Community Research and Development Information Service. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2010a). Communicating Nanotechology: Why, to Whom, Saying What and How? Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. URL: https://cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/communicating-nanotechnology_en.pdf (August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2010b). Europe 2020: Commission proposes new economic strategy. Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/president/news/documents/pdf/20100303_1_en.pdf (August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2010c). A Rationale For Action: Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative – Innovation Union (Accompanying Document). Innovation Union: Transforming Europe through Research and Innovation. COM(2010) 546.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2011). Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council: Establishing Horizon 2020 – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020). Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. COM(2011) 809 final.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2017). Synergy Grants: Criteria. ERC Executive Agency. URL: https://erc.europa.eu/funding/synergy-grants (October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P. (1959). There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom. A Reprint of the Talk (February 1960), Engineering and Science (23), 22–36.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books: New York.Search in Google Scholar

Gilad, S. (2010). It Runs in the Family: Meta-Regulation and Its Siblings. Regulation and Governance, (4), 485–506.10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01090.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gottweis, H. (1998). Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3334.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, A. J. (1966). Éléments pour une théorie de l’interprétation du récit mythique, Communications, 8(8), 28–59.10.3406/comm.1966.1114Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: selected writings in semiotic theory; translation by Paul J. Perron and Frank H. Collins; foreword by Frederic Jameson; introduction by Paul J. Perron.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, A. J. and Courtés, J. (1982). Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. Translation by Crist, L., Patte, D. et al. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (French edn 1979. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette).Search in Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400837311Search in Google Scholar

Korzybski, A. (1933). Chapter IV: On Structure. In Schuchardt Read, C. (Ed.), Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics (1996).Search in Google Scholar

Kostoff, R. N., and R. R. Schaller. (2001). Science and Technology Roadmaps. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(2), 132–43.10.1109/17.922473Search in Google Scholar

Kwiat, J. (2008). From Aristotle to Gabriel: A summary of the narratology literature for story technologies. Technical Report, KMI-08-01. Milton Keynes: Knowledge Media Institute, Open University.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University Of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–251), Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Search in Google Scholar

Lente van, H., & Rip, A. (1998). Expectations in Technological Developments: an Example of Prospective Structures to be Filled in by Agency. In: Disco C., Meulen van der B.J.R. (editors). In N. C. Disco, & B. van der Meulen (Eds.), Getting New Technologies Together. Studies in Making Sociotechnical Order (pp. 203–231). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Lente van, H. (2000). Forceful futures: from promise to requirement. In Brown, N., Rappert, B., and Webster, A. (Eds.), Contested futures: A sociology of prospective Techno-science (pp. 43–63), Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

McDowall, W. (2012). Technology roadmaps for transition management: The case of hydrogen energy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 530–542.10.1016/j.techfore.2011.10.002Search in Google Scholar

McGee, M. C. (1980). The ‘ideograph’: A Link between Rhetoric and Ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66(1), 1–16.10.1080/00335638009383499Search in Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1948). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review, (8)2, 193–210.10.2307/4609267Search in Google Scholar

Mordini, E. (2007). The Narrative Dimension of Nanotechnology: Fabula and Story. Nanotechnology Perceptions, (3), 15–24.Search in Google Scholar

Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230504516Search in Google Scholar

Nordmann, A. (2007). Design Choices in the Nanoworld: A Space Odyssey. In Marian Deblonde, Lieve Goorden, et al. (Eds.), Nano Researchers Facing Choices (pp. 13–30), The Dialogue Series Vol. 10, Antwerp: Universitair Centrum Sint-Ignatius Antwerpen.Search in Google Scholar

Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P. and Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping – A Planning Framework for Evolution and Revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71 (1–2), 5–26.10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6Search in Google Scholar

Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., and Probert, D. R. (2009). Visualising strategy: A classification of graphical road map forms. International Journal of Technology Management, 47(4), 286–305.10.1504/IJTM.2009.024431Search in Google Scholar

Rip, A. (2006). Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists. Science as Culture, 15(4), 349–65.10.1080/09505430601022676Search in Google Scholar

Rip, A. (2012). The context of innovation journeys. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 158–170.10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00640.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schön, D. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem setting in social policy. In: A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 137–163). Cambridge University Press (1st ed.1979).Search in Google Scholar

Schummer, J. (2004). Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology: meanings, interest groups, and social dynamics. Techné, 8(2), 56–87.10.5840/techne2004825Search in Google Scholar

Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stokes, E. (2013). Demand for command: Responding to technological risks and scientific uncertainties. Medical Law Review, 21(1), 11–38.10.1093/medlaw/fws042Search in Google Scholar

Suganami, H. (1996). On the Causes of War. Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198273387.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Verbong, G. P. J., and Geels, F. W. (2010). Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1214–1221.10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.008Search in Google Scholar

Wikberg, K. (2007). The role of corpus linguistics in metaphor research. In: Johanneson, N. L.; Minugh, D. (Ed.). Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals. Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2000a). Nano: the new buzzword in science and technology. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2000-11-14, Record control number (RCN):15831Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2002a). Busquin chairs nanotechnology information day. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2002-06-14, Record control number (RCN):18546Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2002b). Expert group hails nanotechnology as cornerstone in increasing competitiveness. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2002-03-13, Record control number (RCN):18111Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2003a). First large scale release of nanotechnology product into the environment provokes concern. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2003-10-31, Record control number (RCN):21137Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2003b). EIB loan to help Europe stay at the forefront of nanoelectrical research. Community Research and Development Information Service, European Investment Bank (EIB), Date 2003-11-17, Record control number (RCN):21208Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2003c). Nanotechnology: opportunity or threat? Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2003-06-12, Record control number (RCN):20401Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2003d). Europe announces more nano creations. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2003-08-14, Record control number (RCN):20725Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2003e). Experts examine the barriers to public acceptance of nanotechnologies. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2003-12-11, Record control number (RCN):21330Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2004a). Revamped CORDIS service on nanotechnology reflects huge importance of the very small. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2004-11-29, Record control number (RCN):22995Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2004b). Health is wealth, and must be given priority to achieve the Lisbon process, says ERS. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2004-10-20, Record control number (RCN):22799Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2004c). Renewed calls for assessment of nanotechnology risks. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2004-07-12, Record control number (RCN):22314Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2004d). European Construction Technology Platform to outline vision for 2030. Community Research and Development Information Service, European Construction Technology Platform (ECTP), Date 2004-10-19, Record control number (RCN):22792Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2004e). France provides 210 million euro for nanotechnologies. Community Research and Development Information Service, French Research Ministry, Date 2004-12-20, Record control number (RCN):23100Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005a). Key Technologies for Europe reports recommend six pillars for a research strategy ‘Beyond Lisbon’. Community Research and Development Information Service, Conference ‘Key Technologies for Europe’, Date 2005-10-21, Record control number (RCN):24650Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005b). New report identifies ten key nanotechnologies for the developing world, Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-04-12, Record control number (RCN):23659Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005c). New report identifies ten key nanotechnologies for the developing world. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-04-12, Record control number (RCN):23659Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005d). Ireland builds new nanotechnology research centre, Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-02-14, Record control number (RCN):23359Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005e). FP6 project to keep EU at forefront of nanoelectronics. The NanoCMOS consortium, Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-06-28, Record control number (RCN):24055Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005f). EU funded project develops a roadmap for nanotechnology applications. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-10-11, Record control number (RCN):24582Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005g). Technology Platform emphasises interdisciplinarity in roadmap for sustainable chemistry research. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-11-28, Record control number (RCN):24840Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005h). China the notable exception in growing ‘nano-divide’. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-11-07, Record control number (RCN):24720Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2005i). No Knowledge, No Future, Says Potocnik. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-02-03, Record control number (RCN):23304Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2006a). New CORDIS focus supplements published. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-05-24, Record control number (RCN):25710Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2006b). Potocnik vows to defend ERC budget. Community Research and Development Information Service. Based on a speech by Janez Potocnik (SPEECH/06/257), Date 2006-04-26, Record control number (RCN):25556Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2006c). Nano ‘switch’ bridges biological and nano-worlds. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-04-25, Record control number (RCN):25551Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2006d). Raising awareness of nano-bio-technology and its ethical issues. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-04-10, Record control number (RCN):25487Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2006e). Communication and risk assessment: keys to unleashing nano-potential. Community Research and Development Information Service, CORDIS News attendance at European Forum on Nanosciences, Date 2006-10-20, Record control number (RCN):26531Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2006f). EU project gives insight into future of nanotechnology. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-07-05, Record control number (RCN):25949Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2006g). Commissioner reassures industry on JTIs. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-12-07, Record control number (RCN):26774Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2007a). European Commission launches proposals for first Joint Technology Initiatives. Community Research and Development Information Service, Based on CORDIS News attendance at European Commission press conference and press release (IP/07/668), Date 2007-05-16, Record control number (RCN):27685Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2007b). Commission launches consultation on responsible nano research. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2007-07-20, Record control number (RCN):28083Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2007c). Nanotechnology and the environment: beauty rather than beast? Community Research and Development Information Service,Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS News interview with David Rickerby, Date 2007-05-22 Record control number (RCN):27711Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2007d). Clean skies JTI takes off at Paris air show. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2007-06-21, Record control number (RCN):27893Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2007e). Commission takes stock of nano progress. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2007-09-14, Record control number (RCN):28341Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2007f). Nanotechnology: we’ve invested in research, where are the applications? Community Research and Development Information Service, CORDIS News attendance at EuroNanoForum, Date 2007-06-20, Record control number (RCN):27882Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2007g). Trust and communication: keys to public acceptance of nanotechnology. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2007-06-21, Record control number (RCN):27892Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2008). Towards a European Observatory on Nanotechnologies. Community Research and Development Information Service, Institute of Nanotechnology, UK, Date 2008-05-08, Record control number (RCN):29419Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2009a). New EU project to spearhead development of organic nano-materials in electronics. Community Research and Development Information Service, CORDIS News attendance at the public launch of the ONE-P project, Date 2009-03-05, Record control number (RCN):30537Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2009b). Commission underlines importance of supporting development of key technologies. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2009-10-01, Record control number (RCN):31310Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2012). Prion busting molecules. LUPAS project, Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2012-06-15, Record control number (RCN):34730Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2013a). Final Report Summary – NANOFUTURES: A cross-ETP Coordination Initiative on nanotechnology. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2013-01-18, Record control number (RCN):54223Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2013b). ERC-funded project tackles quantum biology. Community Research and Development Information Service, University of Ulm, Date 2013-01-21, Record control number (RCN):35456Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2013c). Calls for proposals for ‘Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEIT)’. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2013-12-18, Record control number (RCN):36340Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2014). NANOFORCE sheds some light on nanoparticle toxicity. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2014-02-13, Record control number (RCN):36448Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS. (2015). European Technology Platform for Nanomedicine and the ENATRANS consortium launch second edition of the Nanomedicine Award. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2015-08-04, Record control number (RCN):127554Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo