This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Araar, A., Duclos, J-Y., Audet, M., & Makdissi, P. (2009). Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to Mexico. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(4), 853–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.xAraarA.DuclosJ-Y.AudetM.MakdissiP.2009Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to MexicoReview of Income and Wealth554853881https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.x10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ashley, R. (2007). Growth may be good for the poor, but decline is disastrous: On the non-robustness of the Dollar – Kraay result. International Review of Economics and Finance, 17, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001AshleyR.2007Growth may be good for the poor, but decline is disastrous: On the non-robustness of the Dollar – Kraay resultInternational Review of Economics and Finance17333338https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.00110.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 55(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911028AtkinsonA. B.1987On the measurement of povertyEconometrica554749764https://doi.org/10.2307/191102810.2307/1911028Search in Google Scholar
Bibi, S., Duclos, J.-Y., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2012). Assessing absolute and relative pro-poor growth, with an application to selected African countries. Economics: The Open-Access Open-Assessment E-Journal, 6, 20–127. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7BibiS.DuclosJ.-Y.Verdier-ChouchaneA.2012Assessing absolute and relative pro-poor growth, with an application to selected African countriesEconomics: The Open-Access Open-Assessment E-Journal620127https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-710.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7Search in Google Scholar
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000DollarD.KraayA.2002Growth is good for the poorJournal of Economic Growth73195225https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102013963100010.1093/0199268657.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Duclos, J. Y. (2009). What is pro-poor? Social Choice and Welfare, 32(1), 37–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-xDuclosJ. Y.2009What is pro-poor?Social Choice and Welfare3213758http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-x10.1007/s00355-008-0308-xSearch in Google Scholar
Essama-Nssah, B., & Lambert, P. J. (2009). Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new results. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 752–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.xEssama-NssahB.LambertP. J.2009Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new resultsReview of Income and Wealth553752778https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.x10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.xSearch in Google Scholar
Foster, J. E., & Shorrocks, A. F. (1988). Poverty orderings. Econometrica, 56(1), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911846FosterJ. E.ShorrocksA. F.1988Poverty orderingsEconometrica561173177https://doi.org/10.2307/191184610.2307/1911846Search in Google Scholar
Grimm, M. (2007). Removing the anonymity axiom in assessing pro-poor growth. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9038-4GrimmM.2007Removing the anonymity axiom in assessing pro-poor growthJournal of Economic Inequality52179197https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9038-410.1007/s10888-006-9038-4Search in Google Scholar
Grosse, M., Harttgen, K., & Klasen, S. (2008). Measuring pro-poor growth in nonincome dimensions. World Development, 36(3), 1021–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009GrosseM.HarttgenK.KlasenS.2008Measuring pro-poor growth in nonincome dimensionsWorld Development36310211047https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.00910.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009Search in Google Scholar
Harmáček, J., Syrovátka, M., & Dušková L. (2017), Pro-poor growth in East Africa. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64(C), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002HarmáčekJ.SyrovátkaM.DuškováL.2017Pro-poor growth in East AfricaThe Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance64C8293https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.00210.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., Khandker, S., & Son, H. H. (2004). Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies. Working paper; New York: United Nations Development Programme. https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444KakwaniN.KhandkerS.SonH. H.2004Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case StudiesWorking paper;New YorkUnited Nations Development Programmehttps://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-44410.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444Search in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., & Pernia, E. M. (2000). What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review, 18(1), 1–16.KakwaniN.PerniaE. M.2000What is pro-poor growth?Asian Development Review18111610.1142/S0116110500000014Search in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., & Son H. (2004). Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies. The Pakistan Development Review, 42(4), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444KakwaniN.SonH.2004Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studiesThe Pakistan Development Review424417444https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-44410.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444Search in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., & Son, H. H. (2008). Poverty equivalent growth rate Review of Income and Wealth, 54(4), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.xKakwaniN.SonH. H.2008Poverty equivalent growth rateReview of Income and Wealth544643655https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.x10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., & Subbarao, K. (1990). Rural poverty and its alleviation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(13), A2–A16.KakwaniN.SubbaraoK.1990Rural poverty and its alleviation in IndiaEconomic and Political Weekly2513A2A16Search in Google Scholar
Klasen, S. (2008). Economic growth and poverty reduction: Measurement issues using income and non-income indicators. World Development, 36(3), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008KlasenS.2008Economic growth and poverty reduction: Measurement issues using income and non-income indicatorsWorld Development363420445https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.00810.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008Search in Google Scholar
Kośny, M., & Yalonetzky, G. (2015). Relative income change and pro-poor growth. Economia Politica, 32(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0017-8KośnyM.YalonetzkyG.2015Relative income change and pro-poor growthEconomia Politica323311327https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0017-810.1007/s40888-015-0017-8Search in Google Scholar
Kraay, A. (2006). When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. Journal of Development Economics, 80(1), 198–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004KraayA.2006When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countriesJournal of Development Economics801198227https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.00410.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004Search in Google Scholar
Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, J. Lelliewell (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being (pp. 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006LayardR.MayrazG.NickellS.2010Does relative income matter? Are the critics right?InDienerE.KahnemanD.LelliewellJ.(Eds.),International Differences in Well-Being139165OxfordOxford University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.000610.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Lo Bue, M., & Palmisano, F. (2019). The individual poverty incidence of growth. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(6), 1295–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12362Lo BueM.PalmisanoF.2019The individual poverty incidence of growthOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics82612951321https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.1236210.35188/UNU-WIDER/2019/675-3Search in Google Scholar
Lopez, H. (2006). Did Growth Become Less Pro-Poor in the 1990s? Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3931LopezH.2006Did Growth Become Less Pro-Poor in the 1990s?Washington, DCWorld Bankhttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-393110.1596/1813-9450-3931Search in Google Scholar
Moyes, P. (1999). Stochastic dominance and the Lorenz curve., In J. Silber (Ed.), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement. Boston: Kluwer, 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7MoyesP.1999Stochastic dominance and the Lorenz curveInSilberJ.(Ed.),Handbook on Income Inequality MeasurementBostonKluwer199225https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_710.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7Search in Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). DAC Guidelines and Reference Series Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for Donors. Paris: OECD.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development2007DAC Guidelines and Reference Series Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for DonorsParisOECDSearch in Google Scholar
Panek, T. (2011). Poverty, Social Exclusion and Inequality. Theory and Measurement Practice. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Press [in Polish].PanekT.2011Poverty, Social Exclusion and Inequality. Theory and Measurement PracticeWarsawWarsaw School of Economics Press [in Polish]Search in Google Scholar
Panek, T., Zwierzchowski, J. (2021). Economic Growth, Poverty, Inequality, and Social Transfers in the European Union, Warsaw: SGH Publishing House.PanekT.ZwierzchowskiJ.2021Economic Growth, Poverty, Inequality, and Social Transfers in the European UnionWarsawSGH Publishing HouseSearch in Google Scholar
Pen, J. (1971). Income Distribution. New York: Praeger. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230231PenJ.1971Income DistributionNew YorkPraegerhttps://doi.org/10.2307/223023110.2307/2230231Search in Google Scholar
Ravallion, M. (1994). Poverty Comparisons. Chur: Harwood Academic.RavallionM.1994Poverty ComparisonsChurHarwood AcademicSearch in Google Scholar
Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 78(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-7RavallionM.ChenS.2003Measuring pro-poor growthEconomics Letters7819399https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-710.1596/1813-9450-2666Search in Google Scholar
Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2009). Absolute and relative poverty: The case of Mexico, 1992–2004. El Trimestre Economico, 76(301), 67–100.Ruiz-CastilloJ.2009Absolute and relative poverty: The case of Mexico, 1992–2004El Trimestre Economico763016710010.20430/ete.v76i301.475Search in Google Scholar
Son, H. H. (2004), A note on pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 82(3), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003SonH. H.2004A note on pro-poor growthEconomics Letters823307314https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.00310.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003Search in Google Scholar
Son, H. H., & Kakwani, N. (2008). Global estimates of pro-poor growth. World Development, 36(6), 1048–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002SonH. H.KakwaniN.2008Global estimates of pro-poor growthWorld Development36610481066https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.00210.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Subramanian, S. (2004). Indicators on Inequality and Poverty. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University.SubramanianS.2004Indicators on Inequality and PovertyHelsinkiWorld Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Tebaldi, E., & Kim, J (2015). Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysis. Eastern Economic Journal, 41(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.14TebaldiE.KimJ2015Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysisEastern Economic Journal412251272https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.1410.1057/eej.2014.14Search in Google Scholar
Zeman, K., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growth. Social Indicators Research, 41(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-9ZemanK.ShamsuddinS.2017Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growthSocial Indicators Research412251272https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-910.1007/s11205-017-1581-9Search in Google Scholar
Zheng, B., (1997). Aggregate poverty measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(2), 123–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00028ZhengB.1997Aggregate poverty measuresJournal of Economic Surveys112123162https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.0002810.1111/1467-6419.00028Search in Google Scholar