1. bookVolume 26 (2021): Issue 1-2 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2084-4506
First Published
17 Jan 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Using the Raspberry Pi Microcomputers in STEM Education in Technically Oriented High Schools

Published Online: 21 Jan 2022
Page range: 73 - 88
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2084-4506
First Published
17 Jan 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The article deals with learning using the project-based method in STEM education. The article describes the use of ICT technologies, specifically Raspberry Pi microcomputers in bending experiment. The bending experiment was designed for students of technically oriented high schools. Pedagogical research was conducted to determine whether the knowledge and skills of students who have been educated by the project-based method in STEM education are more complex, more systematic and more permanent than the knowledge and skills of students taught by standard forms of teaching. The article presents the results of pedagogical research, which lasted for three years. The results confirm that project-based learning and using ICT in STEM education developed complex knowledge and skills in STEM education. Comprehensive knowledge and problem-solving skills are important for the sustainable development of technological education.

Keywords

[l] Mohr-Schroeder MJ, Cavalcanti M, Blyman K. STEM Education: Understanding the Changing Landscape. In: Sahin A, editor. A Practice-based Model of STEM Teaching: Stem Students on the Stage (SOS)™. Sense Publishers, Netherlands; 2015. ISBN: 9789463000192. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6300-019-2_1.10.1007/978-94-6300-019-2_1 Search in Google Scholar

Bybee R. Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technol Eng Teacher. 2010:30-5. DOI: 10.1007/s40692-015-0041-2.10.1007/s40692-015-0041-2 Search in Google Scholar

English LD. STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. Int J STEM Education. 2016;3:3. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 Search in Google Scholar

Becker K, Park K. Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: a preliminary meta-analysis. J STEM Education Innovations Res. 2011;12(5-6):23-37. DOI: 10.12691/education-2-10-4.10.12691/education-2-10-4 Search in Google Scholar

Asghar A, Ellington R, Rice E, Johnson F, Prime G. Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary J Problem-Based Learning. 2012;6(2):85-125. DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1349.10.7771/1541-5015.1349 Search in Google Scholar

Falloon G, Hatzigianni M, Bower M, Forbes A, Stevenson M. Understanding K-12 STEM education: A framework for developing STEM literacy. J Sci Education Technol. 2020;29:369-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x.10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x Search in Google Scholar

Simpson A, Bouhafa Y. Youths’ and adults’ identity in STEM: A systematic literature review. J STEM Education Res. 2020;3:167-94. DOI: 10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y.10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y Search in Google Scholar

Li Y. Int J STEM Education - a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. IJ STEM Ed. 2014:1. DOI: 10.1186/2196-7822-1-1.10.1186/2196-7822-1-1 Search in Google Scholar

Paul KM, Maltese AV, Valdivia SD. Development and validation of the role identity surveys in engineering (RIS-E) and STEM (RIS-STEM) for elementary students. IJ STEM Ed. 2020;7:45. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00243-2.10.1186/s40594-020-00243-2 Search in Google Scholar

Ng O, Shi L, Ting F. Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: dynamic geometry and 3D printing. IJ STEM Ed. 2020;7:50. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1.10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1 Search in Google Scholar

Malcom SM, Chubin DE, Jesse JK. Standing Our Ground: A Guidebook for STEM Educators in the Post-Michigan Era. Am Associat Advancement Sci; 2004. ISBN: 0871686996. Search in Google Scholar

Kramarová L, Prokša M. Pupils’ preconceptions about heat, temperature and energy. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25(1-2):79-91. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0005.10.2478/cdem-2020-0005 Search in Google Scholar

Rusek M, Vojíř K, Šubová Š. Lower-secondary school chemistry textbooks’ didactic equipment. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25(1-2):69-77. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0004.10.2478/cdem-2020-0004 Search in Google Scholar

Rusek M, Chroustová K, Bílek M, Skřehot PA, Hon Z. Conditions for experimental activities at elementary and high schools from chemistry teachers’ point of view. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25(1-2):93-100. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0006.10.2478/cdem-2020-0006 Search in Google Scholar

Simeonov V. Didactical principles of environmental monitoring. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2019;24(1-2):99-106. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2019-0008.10.2478/cdem-2019-0008 Search in Google Scholar

Frontasyeva M, Kamnev A. Ecology and society. Impacted ecosystems. Part I. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2018; 23(1-2):7-29. DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2018-0001.10.1515/cdem-2018-0001 Search in Google Scholar

Krzeszowski Ś. Evaluation of the usefulness of selected computer programs in the context of educating students of the environmental engineering. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2016;20(1-2):31-7. DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2015-0003.10.1515/cdem-2015-0003 Search in Google Scholar

Tišnovský P. Legendární školní mikropočítač IQ-151 [Legendary school microcomputer IQ-151]. Available from: https://www.root.cz/clanky/legendarni-skolni-mikropocitac-iq-151/ Search in Google Scholar

Bulena B. Československé osmibitové počítače [Czechoslovak 8-bit computers]. Available from: http://studium.chytrak.cz/nostalgia/cs_obit_pc.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Krejčířová M. “Domácí počítače” nedávné minulosti [”Home computers” of the recent past]. Available from: https://www.fi.muni.cz/usr/jkucera/pv109/xkrejcir.htm. Search in Google Scholar

Winfrey J. Physics I Laboratory Manual with PASCO Capstone Supporting Software. Amazon.com; 2015. ISBN: 9781508778790. Search in Google Scholar

Suca L. Physics4AL: Mechanics Lab Manual, UCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy; 2013. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/266462644/Manual-de-pasco-Capstone-experiment-mechanic-1 Search in Google Scholar

Subhash G, Ridgeway S. Mechanics of Materials Laboratory Course. Morgan Claypool 2018. Available from: https://www.morganclaypoolpublishers.com/catalog_Orig/samples/9781681733340_sample.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Al Faruque A, Cooke HG. Impact of Upgrading Equipment for Strength of Materials Labs on Student Perceptions, Motivation, and Learning, RIT Scholar Works. Rochester Institute of Technology; 2015. Available from: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1870&context=other. Search in Google Scholar

Instruction Manual 012-13762D: Materials Testing Machine ME-8236, Part of the Comprehensive Materials Testing System ME-8244. Available from: https://usermanual.wiki/Pasco-Specialty-And-Mfg/PascoSpecialtyAndMfgMaterialsTestingMachineMe8236UsersManual516790.1189831755.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Barrows HS. Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions Teaching Learning. 2006;(68):3-12. DOI: 10.1002/tl.37219966804.10.1002/tl.37219966804 Search in Google Scholar

Mehalik M, Doppelt Y, Schunn CD. Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Res J Eng Education. 2008;97:71-85. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x Search in Google Scholar

Morrison GR. Designing Effective Instruction, 6th Edition. John Wiley Sons; 2010. ISBN: 0470074264. Search in Google Scholar

Doppelt Y, Mehalik MM, Schunn CD, Silk E, Krysinski D. Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context. J Technol Education. 2008;19(2). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229088018_Engagement_and_Achievements_A_Case_Study_of_Design-Based_Learning_in_a_Science_Context. Search in Google Scholar

Burdick A. Design without Designers. Materials of the Conference on the Future of Art and Design Education in the 21st century held at the University of Brighton, May 22, 2009. Available from: http://anneburdick.com/Design-wo-Designers/Burdick_Design_wo_Designers.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Halliday D, Resnick R, Walker J. Fundamental of Physics. John Wiley Sons Inc, USA; 2013. ISBN: 9781118230725. Search in Google Scholar

Hibbeler RC. Mechanics of Materials in SI Edition. Pearson Education Limited, USA; 2017. ISBN: 9781292178202. Search in Google Scholar

Zachariadou K, Yiasemides K, Trougkakos N. A low-cost computer-controlled Arduino-based educational laboratory system for teaching the fundamentals of photovoltaic cells. Eur J Phys. 2012;33:1599-610. DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/33/6/1599.10.1088/0143-0807/33/6/1599 Search in Google Scholar

Tinker RF. Microcomputer-based Labs: Educational Research and Standards. Springer; 1992. ISBN: 9783540615583. Search in Google Scholar

Nayyar A, Puri V. Raspberry Pi - A small, powerful, cost effective and efficient form factor computer: A review. Int J Adv Res Computer Sci Software Eng (IJARCSSE). 2015;5:720-37. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305668622_Raspberry_Pi-A_Small_Powerful_Cost_Effective_and_Efficient_Form_Factor_Computer_A_Review. Search in Google Scholar

Chaudhari H. Raspberry Pi Technology: A Review. Int J Innovative Emerging Res Eng. 2015;2(3):83-7. Available from: http://www.ijiere.com/FinalPaper/FinalPaper201532874333741.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Cloutier MF, Paradis C, Weaver VM. A Raspberry Pi cluster instrumented for fine-grained power measurement. Electronics. 2016;5(4):61. DOI: 10.3390/electronics5040061.10.3390/electronics5040061 Search in Google Scholar

Zhong X, Liang Y. Raspberry Pi: An effective vehicle in teaching the internet of things in computer science and engineering. Electronics. 2016;5(3):56. DOI: 10.3390/electronics5030056.10.3390/electronics5030056 Search in Google Scholar

Reck RM, Sreenivas RS. Developing an affordable and portable control systems laboratory kit with a Raspberry Pi. Electronics. 2016;5(3):36. DOI: 10.3390/electronics5030036.10.3390/electronics5030036 Search in Google Scholar

Kölling M. Educational Programming on the Raspberry Pi. Electronics. 2016;5(3):33. DOI: 10.3390/electronics5030033.10.3390/electronics5030033 Search in Google Scholar

Karvinen T, Karvinen K, Valtokari V. Make: Sensors: A Hands-On Primer for Monitoring the Real World with Arduino and Raspberry Pi. Maker Media, Inc; USA. 2014. ISBN-13: 9781449368104. Search in Google Scholar

Karvinen T, Karvinen K, Valtokari V. Getting Started with Sensors: Measure the World with Electronics, Arduino, and Raspberry Pi, Make Community, LLC; USA, 2014. ISBN-13: 9781449367084. Search in Google Scholar

Gil-Domenech D, Berbegal-Mirabent J. Stimulating students’ engagement in mathematics courses in non-STEM academic programmes: A game-based learning. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2019;56:57-65. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2017.1330159.10.1080/14703297.2017.1330159 Search in Google Scholar

Saienki N, Olizko Y, Arshad M. Development of tasks with art elements for teaching engineers in English for specific purposes classroom. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2019;14:4-16. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v14i23.11955.10.3991/ijet.v14i23.11955 Search in Google Scholar

Mwenda AB, Sullivan M, Grand A. How do Australian universities market STEM courses in YouTube videos? J Mark High Educ. 2019;29:191-208. DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2019.1633004.10.1080/08841241.2019.1633004 Search in Google Scholar

Ferrada C, Díaz-Levicoy D, Salgado-Orellana N, Parraguez R. Propuesta de actividades STEM con Bee-bot en matematica [Proposals of mathematical activities with a Bee-bot child robot based on STEM education]. Edma 0-6 Educ Math Infanc. 2019;8:33-43. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334593444_Propuesta_de_actividades_STEM_con_Bee-bot_en_matematica.10.24197/edmain.1.2019.33-43 Search in Google Scholar

Sigal M, Jacobs S. Preparing for university: An applied analysis on the Efficacy of 4U and university level preparatory STEM courses. Can J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2019;10:1-23. DOI: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.1.7996.10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.1.7996 Search in Google Scholar

Pyraz GT, Kumpete EG. An example of STEM education in Turkey and distance education for sustainable STEM learning. J Qual Res Educ. 2019;7:1345-64. DOI: 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.7c.4s.2m.10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.7c.4s.2m Search in Google Scholar

Hinojo-Lucena FJ, Dúo-Terrón P, Navas-Parejo MR, Rodríguez-Jiménez C, Moreno-Guerrero AJ. Scientific performance and mapping of the term STEM in education on the Web of Science. Sustainability. 2020;12:2279. DOI: 10.3390/su12062279.10.3390/su12062279 Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-García AM, López J, Agreda M, Moreno-Guerrero AJ. Productive, structural and dynamic study of the concept of sustainability in the educational field. Sustainability. 2019;11:5613. DOI: 10.3390/su11205613.10.3390/su11205613 Search in Google Scholar

Mendes JV, Oliveira GR, De Souza LM. The G-index: A sustainability reporting assessment tool. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 2019;26:428-38. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2019.1589595.10.1080/13504509.2019.1589595 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo