Open Access

Sentiment Analysis of Tweets on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic from Metro Manila, Philippines


Cite

1. Wu, Z., J. M. McGoogan. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. – JAMA, 2020.10.1001/jama.2020.2648Search in Google Scholar

2. Yang, Y., F. Peng, R. Wang, K. Guan, T. Jiang, G. Xu, J. Sun, C. Chang. The Deadly Coronaviruses: The 2003 Sars Pandemic and the 2020 Novel Coronavirus Epidemic in China. – Journal of Autoimmunity, 2020, p. 102434.10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102434Search in Google Scholar

3. Phan, T. Novel Coronavirus: From Discovery to Clinical Diagnostics. – Infection, Genetics and Evolution, Vol. 79, 2020, p. 104211.10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104211Search in Google Scholar

4. Sohrabi, C., Z. Alsafi, N. O’Neill, M. Khan, A. Kerwan, A. Al-Jabir, C. Iosifidis, R. Agha. World Health Organization Declares Global Emergency: A Review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19). – International Journal of Surgery, Vol. 76, 2020.10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034Search in Google Scholar

5. Lima, C. K. T., P. M. d. M. Carvalho, I. d. A. S. Lima, J. V. A. d. O. Nunes, J. S. Saraiva, R. I. de Souza, C. G. L. da Silva, M. L. R. Neto. The Emotional Impact of Coronavirus 2019-Ncov (New Coronavirus Disease). – Psychiatry Research, 2020, p. 112915.10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112915Search in Google Scholar

6. Brooks, S. K., R. K. Webster, L. E. Smith, L. Woodland, S. Wessely, N. Greenberg, G. J. Rubin. The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence. – The Lancet, Vol. 395, 2020, No 10227, pp. 912-920.10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8Search in Google Scholar

7. Villapando, A. Prrd Orders “Stringent Social Distancing Measures” in Ncr., 2020. https://pia.gov.ph/news/articles/1036195Search in Google Scholar

8. Zhao, Y., J. Zhang. Consumer Health Information Seeking in Social Media: A Literature Review. – Health Information & Libraries Journal, Vol. 34, 2017, No 4, pp. 268-283.10.1111/hir.1219229045011Search in Google Scholar

9. Brandtzæg, P. B., J. Heim. Why People Use Social Networking Sites. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2009, pp. 143-152.10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_16Search in Google Scholar

10. Liu, B. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2012.10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016Search in Google Scholar

11. Wang, Y., M. S. M. Pozi, Y. Kawai, A. Jatowt, T. Akiyama. Exploring Cross-Cultural Crowd Sentiments on Twitter. – In: Proc. of 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, Prague, Czech Republic, 2017.10.1145/3078714.3078749Search in Google Scholar

12. Kordonis, J., S. Symeonidis, A. Arampatzis. Stock Price Forecasting via Sentiment Analysis on Twitter. – In: Proc. of 20th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Patras, Greece, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003733.300378710.1145/3003733.3003787Search in Google Scholar

13. Kanavos, A., N. Nodarakis, S. Sioutas, A. Tsakalidis, D. Tsolis, G. Tzimas. Large Scale Implementations for Twitter Sentiment Classification. – Algorithms, 2017.10.3390/a10010033Search in Google Scholar

14. Krauss, J., S. Nann, D. Simon, K. Fischbach, P. Gloor. Predicting Movie Success and Academy Awards through Sentiment and Social Network Analysis. – In: Proc. of European Conference in Information Systems, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

15. Wang, H., D. Can, A. Kazemzadeh, F. Bar, S. Narayanan. A System for Real-Time Twitter Sentiment Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. – In: Proc. of ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, Jeju Island, Korea, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

16. Karami, A., V. Shah, R. Vaezi, A. Bansal. Twitter Speaks: A Case of National Disaster Situational Awareness. – Journal of Information Science, 2019.10.1177/0165551519828620Search in Google Scholar

17. Yin, J., A. Lampert, M. Cameron, B. Robinson, R. Power. Using Social Media to Enhance Emergency Situation Awareness. – IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 27, 2012.10.1109/MIS.2012.6Search in Google Scholar

18. Qu, Y., C. Huang, P. Zhang, J. Zhang. Microblogging after a Major Disaster in China: A Case Study of the 2010 Yushu Earthquake. – In: Proc. of ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China, 2011.10.1145/1958824.1958830Search in Google Scholar

19. Sakaki, T., M. Okazaki, Y. Matsuo. Earthquake Shakes Twitter Users: Real-Time Event Detection by Social Sensors. – In: Proc. of 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 2010.10.1145/1772690.1772777Search in Google Scholar

20. Vieweg, S. E. Situational Awareness in Mass Emergency: A Behavioral and Linguistic Analysis of Microblogged Communications. Doctor of Philosophy in Technology, Media and Society, Graduate School, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

21. Imran, M., C. Castillo, F. Diaz, S. Vieweg. Processing Social Media Messages in Mass Emergency: A Survey. – ACM Comput. Surv., Vol. 47, 2015, No 4, Article 67.10.1145/2771588Search in Google Scholar

22. Qu, Y., P. F. Wu, X. Wang. Online Community Response to Major Disaster: A Study of Tianya Forum in the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake. – In: Proc. of 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2009, pp. 1-11.Search in Google Scholar

23. Starbird, K., L. Palen, A. L. Hughes, S. Vieweg. Chatter on the Red: What Hazards Threat Reveals About the Social Life of Microblogged Information. – In: Proc. of 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Savannah, Georgia, USA, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.171896510.1145/1718918.1718965Search in Google Scholar

24. Vieweg, S., A. L. Hughes, K. Starbird, L. Palen. Microblogging During Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness. – In: Proc. of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753486.10.1145/1753326.1753486Search in Google Scholar

25. Imran, M., S. Elbassuoni, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, P. Meier. Practical Extraction of Disaster-Relevant Information from Social Media. – In: Proc. of 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013.10.1145/2487788.2488109Search in Google Scholar

26. Truong, B., C. Caragea, A. Squicciarini, A. H. Tapia. Identifying Valuable Information from Twitter during Natural Disasters. – Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 51, 2014, No 1, pp. 1-4.10.1002/meet.2014.14505101162Search in Google Scholar

27. Ren, D., X. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Li, X. Yuan. Weiboevents: A Crowd Sourcing Weibo Visual Analytic System. – In: Proc. of 2014 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, 2014, pp. 330-334.Search in Google Scholar

28. Morstatter, F., S. Kumar, H. Liu, R. Maciejewski. Understanding Twitter Data with Tweetxplorer. – In: Proc. of 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2013.10.1145/2487575.2487703Search in Google Scholar

29. MacEachren, A. M., A. Jaiswal, A. C. Robinson, S. Pezanowski, A. Savelyev, P. Mitra, J. Zhang, J. Blanford. Senseplace2: GeoTwitter Analytics Support for Situational Awareness. – In: Proc. of 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011, pp. 181-190.10.1109/VAST.2011.6102456Search in Google Scholar

30. Calderon, N. A., R. Arias-Hernandez, B. Fisher. Studying Animation for Real-Time Visual Analytics: A Design Study of Social Media Analytics in Emergency Management. – In: Proc. of 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2014, pp. 1364-1373.10.1109/HICSS.2014.176Search in Google Scholar

31. Abel, F., C. Hauff, G.-J. Houben, R. Stronkman, K. Tao. Semantics + Filtering + Search = Twitcident. Exploring Information in Social Web Streams. – In: Proc. of 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 2012.10.1145/2309996.2310043Search in Google Scholar

32. Soriano, C. R., M. D. G. Roldan, C. Cheng, N. Oco. Social Media and Civic Engagement During Calamities: The Case of Twitter Use During Typhoon Yolanda. – Philippine Political Science Journal, Vol. 37, 2016, No 1, pp. 6-25.10.1080/01154451.2016.1146486Search in Google Scholar

33. Neppalli, V. K., C. Caragea, A. Squicciarini, A. Tapia, S. Stehle. Sentiment Analysis During Hurricane Sandy in Emergency Response. – International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 21, 2017, pp. 213-222.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.011Search in Google Scholar

34. Verma, S., S. Vieweg, W. J. Corvey, L. Palen, J. H. Martin, M. Palmer, A. Schram, K. M. Anderson. Natural Language Processing to the Rescue? Extracting “Situational Awareness” Tweets during Mass Emergency. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

35. Kaur. A. Analyzing Twitter Feeds to Facilitate Crises Informatics and Disaster Response During Mass Emergencies. M. Sc. in Computing (Data Analytics), Dublin Institute of Technology, TU Dublin, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

36. Pang, B., L. Lee. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. – Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, Vol. 2, 2008, No 1-2, pp. 1-135.10.1561/1500000011Search in Google Scholar

37. To, H., S. Agrawal, S. H. Kim, C. Shahabi. On Identifying Disaster-Related Tweets: Matching-Based or Learning-Based?. – In: Proc. of 2017 IEEE Third International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM), 2017, pp. 330-337.10.1109/BigMM.2017.82Search in Google Scholar

38. Hasan, A., S. Moin, A. Karim, S. Shamshirband. Machine Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis for Twitter Accounts. – Mathematical and Computational Applications, 2018.10.3390/mca23010011Search in Google Scholar

39. Pang, B., L. Lee, S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs Up? Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques. – In: Proc. of ACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Vol. 10, 2002.10.3115/1118693.1118704Search in Google Scholar

40. Pang, B., L. Lee. A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts. – In: Proc. of 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, 2004.10.3115/1218955.1218990Search in Google Scholar

41. Nielsen, F. A. A New Anew: Evaluation of a Word List for Sentiment Analysis in Microblogs. – In: Proc. of ESWC Workshop on “Making Sense of Microposts”: Big Things Come in Small Packages, Heraklion, Crete, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

42. Baccianella, S., A. Esuli, F. Sebastiani. Sentiwordnet 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. – In: Proc. of 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Valletta, Malta, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

43. Rout, J. K., K.-K. R. Choo, A. K. Dash, S. Bakshi, S. K. Jena, K. L. Williams. A Model for Sentiment and Emotion Analysis of Unstructured Social Media Text. – Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 18, 2018, No 1, pp. 181-199.10.1007/s10660-017-9257-8Search in Google Scholar

44. Taboada, M., J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, K. Voll, M. Stede. Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis. – Computational Linguistics, Vol. 37, 2011, No 2, pp. 267-307.10.1162/COLI_a_00049Search in Google Scholar

45. Zhou, Z., X. Zhang, M. Sanderson. Sentiment Analysis on Twitter through Topic-Based Lexicon Expansion. – Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014, pp. 98-109.10.1007/978-3-319-08608-8_9Search in Google Scholar

46. Jurek, A., M. D. Mulvenna, Y. Bi. Improved Lexicon-Based Sentiment Analysis for Social Media Analytics. – Security Informatics, Vol. 4, 2015, No 9.10.1186/s13388-015-0024-xSearch in Google Scholar

47. Ray, D. Lexicon Based Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data. – International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 2017.10.22214/ijraset.2017.10130Search in Google Scholar

48. Han, H., Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Yang, X. Zou. Improving the Performance of Lexicon-Based Review Sentiment Analysis Method by Reducing Additional Introduced Sentiment Bias. – PLOS ONE, Vol. 13, 2018, No 8, p. e0202523.10.1371/journal.pone.0202523610845830142154Search in Google Scholar

49. Naldi, M. A Review of Sentiment Computation Methods with R Packages. – arXiv, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

50. Davies, S. E. National Security and Pandemics. – United Nation Chronicle, Vol. 50, 2013, No 2.10.18356/0dfec716-enSearch in Google Scholar

51. Price-Smith, A. T. Contagion and Chaos: Disease, Ecology, and National Security in the Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2009.10.7551/mitpress/7390.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

52. Qiu, W., S. Rutherford, A. Mao, C. Chu. The Pandemic and Its Impacts. – Health, Culture, and Society, 2016.10.5195/HCS.2017.221Search in Google Scholar

53. Garcia, M. B. e-Learning Technology Adoption in the Philippines: An Investigation of Factors Affecting Filipino College Students’ Acceptance of Learning Management Systems. –International Journal of e-Learning and Educational Technologies in the Digital Media (IJEETDM), Vol. 3, 2017, No 3, pp. 118-130.10.17781/P002374Search in Google Scholar

54. Lau, J. T. F., X. Yang, E. Pang, H. Y. Tsui, E. Wong, Y. K. Wing. Sars-Related Perceptions in Hong Kong. – Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 11, 2005, No 3, pp. 417-424.10.3201/eid1103.040675Search in Google Scholar

55. Fielding, R., W. T. Lam Wendy. Reducing Avian Influenza Risk: A Qualitative Exploration of Issues in Hong Kong. – Health Education, Vol. 107, 2007, No 5, pp. 437-447.10.1108/09654280710778574Search in Google Scholar

56. Rubin, G. J., R. Amlôt, L. Page, S. Wessely. Public Perceptions, Anxiety, and Behaviour Change in Relation to the Swine Flu Outbreak: Cross Sectional Telephone Survey. – BMJ, Vol. 339, 2009, p. b2651.10.1136/bmj.b2651271468719574308Search in Google Scholar

57. Bish, A., S. Michie. Demographic and Attitudinal Determinants of Protective Behaviours During a Pandemic: A Review. – British Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 15, 2010, No 4.10.1348/135910710X485826718545220109274Search in Google Scholar

58. Pickles, H. Using Lessons from the Past to Plan for Pandemic Flu. – BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), Vol. 332, 2006, No 7544, pp. 783-786.10.1136/bmj.332.7544.783142070216575084Search in Google Scholar

59. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Pandemic Influenza – Past, Present, Future: Communicating Today Based on the Lessons from the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic”. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Washington, DC 2006.Search in Google Scholar

60. Yoon, M.-K., S.-Y. Kim, H.-S. Ko, M.-S. Lee. System Effectiveness of Detection, Brief Intervention and Refer to Treatment for the People with Post-Traumatic Emotional Distress by Mers: A Case Report of Community-Based Proactive Intervention in South Korea. – International Journal of Mental Health Systems, Vol. 10, 2016, No 1, p. 51.10.1186/s13033-016-0083-5497650527504141Search in Google Scholar

61. Lee, S., L. Y. Y. Chan, A. M. Y. Chau, K. P. S. Kwok, A. Kleinman. The Experience of Sars-Related Stigma at Amoy Gardens. – Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 61, 2005, No 9, pp. 2038-2046.10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.010711697515913861Search in Google Scholar

62. Hawryluck, L., W. L. Gold, S. Robinson, S. Pogorski, S. Galea, R. Styra. Sars Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, Canada. – Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 10, 2004, No 7, pp. 1206-1212.10.3201/eid1007.030703332334515324539Search in Google Scholar

63. GMA News. Manila Mayor Isko Moreno Implements Covid-19 Action Plan. 2020.https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/metro/729490/manila-mayor-isko-moreno-implements-covid-19-action-plan/story/Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1314-4081
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Computer Sciences, Information Technology