Fuzzy Group Full Consistency Method for Weight Determination

1. Badi, I., A. Abdulshahed. Ranking the Libyan Airlines by Using Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). – Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, Vol. 2, 2019, No 1, pp. 1-14.10.31181/oresta1901001bSearch in Google Scholar

2. Cao, Q., M. O. Esangbedo, S. Bai, C. O. Esangbedo. Grey SWARA-FUCOM Weighting Method for Contractor Selection MCDM Problem: A Case Study of Floating Solar Panel Energy System Installation. – Energies, Vol. 12, 2019, No 13.10.3390/en12132481Search in Google Scholar

3. Erol, I., S. Sencer, R. Sari. A New Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Framework for Measuring Sustainability Performance of a Supply Chain. – Ecological Economics, Vol. 70, 2011, No 6, pp. 1088-1100.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.001Search in Google Scholar

4. Fan, J. P., Y. J. Li, M. Q. Wu. Technology Selection Based on EDAS Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method. – IEEE Access, Vol. 7, pp. 58974-58980.10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915345Search in Google Scholar

5. Fazlollahtabar, H., A. Smailbašić, Ž. Stević. FUCOM Method in Group Decision-Making: Selection of Forklift in a Warehouse. – Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, Vol. 2, 2019, No 1, pp. 49-65.Search in Google Scholar

6. Guo, S., H. Zhao. Fuzzy Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method and Its Applications. – Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 121, 2017, pp. 23-31.10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010Search in Google Scholar

7. Ilieva, G. Decision Making Methods in Agent Based Modelling. – In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings 752, 2011, pp. 8-17.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ilieva, G. Group Decision Analysis Algorithms with EDAS for Interval Fuzzy Sets. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 18, 2018, No 2, pp. 51-64.10.2478/cait-2018-0027Search in Google Scholar

9. Mardani, A., E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakuan, A. Jusoh, K. M. Nor, M. Khoshnoudi. A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Applications to Solve Energy Management Problems: Two Decades from 1995 to 2015. – Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 71, 2017, pp. 216-256.10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.053Search in Google Scholar

10. Nagoor, Gani, A., S. N. MohamedAssarudeen. A New Operation on Triangular Fuzzy Number for Solving Fuzzy Linear Programming Problem. – Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 6, 2012, No 12, pp. 525-532.Search in Google Scholar

11. Naz, S., M. Akram. Novel Decision-Making Approach Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Graph Theory. – Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 38, 2019, No 7, pp. 1-26.10.1007/s40314-019-0773-0Search in Google Scholar

12. Pamučar, D., M. Deveci, F. Canıtez, D. Bozanic. A Fuzzy Full Consistency Method-Dombi-Bonferroni Model for Prioritizing Transportation Demand Management Measures. – Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 87, 2020.10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105952Search in Google Scholar

13. Pamučar, D., Ž.Stević, S. Sremac. New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). – Symmetry, Vol. 10, 2018, No 9.10.3390/sym10090393Search in Google Scholar

14. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Criteria Importance Depending on Membership Degrees of Fuzzy Relations. – Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 61, 2008, No 5, pp. 579-584.Search in Google Scholar

15. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Fuzzy Relations. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 8, 2008, No 4, pp. 3-12.Search in Google Scholar

16. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Weighting Functions for the Criteria. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 4, pp. 58-71.Search in Google Scholar

17. Popchev, I., V. Peneva. A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Algorithm. – In: Proc of 10th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 19-24 July 1992, Taipei, Vol. II, pp. 11-16.Search in Google Scholar

18. Radeva, I. Multicriteria Fuzzy Sets Application in Economic Clustering Problems. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 17, 2017, No 3, pp. 29-46.10.1515/cait-2017-0028Search in Google Scholar

19. Shakeel, M, S. Abdullah. Some Induced Interval-Valued Pythagorean Trapezoidal Fuzzy Averaging Aggregation Operators Based on Einstein Operations and Their Application in Group Decision-Making. – Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 38, 2019.10.1007/s40314-019-0858-9Search in Google Scholar

20. Sharaf, I. M. An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS Using the Extended Vertex Method for MAGDM. – SN Applied Sciences, Vol. 2, 2020.10.1007/s42452-019-1825-1Search in Google Scholar

21. Sharaf, I. M. TOPSIS with Similarity Measure for MADM Applied to Network Selection. – Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 37, 2018, No 4, pp. 4104-4121.10.1007/s40314-017-0556-4Search in Google Scholar

22. Stević, Z., N. Brković. A Novel Integrated FUCOM-MARCOS Model for Evaluation of Human Resources in a Transport Company. – Logistics, Vol. 4, 2020, No 1.10.3390/logistics4010004Search in Google Scholar

23. Tabatabaei, M. H., M. Amiri, M. Ghahremanloo, M. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene. Hierarchical Decision-Making Using a new Mathematical Model Based on the Best-Worst Method. – International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, Vol. 14, 2019, No 6, pp. 669-684.10.15837/ijccc.2019.6.3675Search in Google Scholar

24. VanLaarhoven, P. J. M., W. Pedrycz. A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory. – Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 11, 1983, No 1-3, pp. 229-241.10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7Search in Google Scholar

25. Wu, W. W., Y. T. Lee. Developing Global Managers’ Competencies Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method. – Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 32, 2007, No 2, pp. 499-507.10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhao, H., S. Guo. Selecting Green Supplier of Thermal Power Equipment by Using a Hybrid MCDM Method for Sustainability. – Sustainability, Vol. 6, 2014, No 1, pp. 217-235.10.3390/su6010217Search in Google Scholar