Use of Silver Nitrate for the Assessment of Sperm Measurements in Selected Farm and Free-Living Animal Species

1. Andraszek K., Smalec E.: The use of silver nitrate for the identification of spermatozoon structure in selected mammals. Can J Anim Sci 2011, 91, 239-246.10.4141/cjas10052Search in Google Scholar

2. Andraszek K., Gryzińska M. Knaga S., Wójcik E., Smalec E.: Number and size of nucleoli in the spermatocytes of chicken and Japanese quail. Folia Biol (Krakow) 2012, 60, 121-127.10.3409/fb60_3-4.121-12723342905Search in Google Scholar

3. Bielańska-Osuchowska Z., Sysa P.: Ultrastructure of the mammalian sperm. In: Cell ultrastructure and function. Mechanisms of regulation, edited by Łukaszczyk A., Bilińska B., Kawiak J., Bielańska-Osuchowska Z., PWN SA. Warszawa, Poland, 1998, pp. 76-94.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bongso T.A.: Comparative silver staining patterns of water buffalo, goat and pig spermatozoa. Arch Androl 1983, 11, 13 -17.10.3109/014850183089874536625746Search in Google Scholar

5. Carrell D.T., Hammoud S.S.: The human sperm epigenome and its potential role in embryonic development. Mol Hum Reprod 2010, 16, 37-47.10.1093/molehr/gap09019906823Search in Google Scholar

6. Cohen J., Matter H., Wright G., Kort H., Massey J., Mitchell D.: Partial zone dissection of human oocytes when failure of zona pellucida penetration is anticipated. Hum Reprod 1989, 4, 435-442.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a1369232745674Search in Google Scholar

7. Dehghani H., Dellaire G., Bazett-Jones D.P.: Organization of chromatin in the interphase mammalian cell. Micron 2005, 36, 95-108.10.1016/j.micron.2004.10.00315629642Search in Google Scholar

8. Esteso M.C., Fernández-Santos M.R., Soler A.J., Montoro V., Quintero-Moreno A., Garde J.J.: The effects of cryopreservation on the morphometric dimensions of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm heads. Reprod Domest Anim 2006, 41, 241 -246.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00676.x16689889Search in Google Scholar

9. Evans E.P., Breckon G., Ford C.E.: An air-drying method for meiotic preparation from mammalian testes. Cytogenetics 1964, 3, 295-298.10.1159/00012981814248459Search in Google Scholar

10. Evenson D.P., Jost L.K., Marshall D., Zinaman M.J., Clegg E., Purvis K., de Angelis P., Claussen O.P.: Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 1999, 14, 1039-1049.10.1093/humrep/14.4.103910221239Search in Google Scholar

11. Guzick D.S., Overstreet J.W., Factor-Litvak P., Brazil C.K., Nakajima S.T., Coutifarls C., Carson S.A., Cisneros P., Steinkampf M.P., Hill J.A., Xu D., Vogel D.L.: Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Eng J Med 2001, 345, 1388-1393.10.1056/NEJMoa00300511794171Search in Google Scholar

12. Henkel R., Schreiber G., Sturmhoefel A., Hipler U.C., Zermann D.H., Menkveld R.: Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 2008, 89, 449-455.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.02717601601Search in Google Scholar

13. Hidalgo M., Rodriguez I., Dorado J.: Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 996-1003.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.02.03916620924Search in Google Scholar

14. Howell W.M., Black D.A.: Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer. a 1 -step method. Experentia 1980, 36, 1014-1015.10.1007/BF019538556160049Search in Google Scholar

15. Iranpour F.G., Nasr-Esfahani M.H., Valojerdi M.R., al-Taraihi T.M.: Chromomycin A3 staining as a useful tool for evaluation of male fertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000, 17, 60-66.10.1023/A:1009406231811Search in Google Scholar

16. Jenkins T.G., Emery B.R., Carrell D.T.: Assays used in the study of sperm nuclear proteins. In: Sperm Chromatin - Biological and Clinical Applications in Male Infertility and Assisted Reproduction, edited by Springer Science+Business Media, London, 2011, pp. 233-241.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kazerooni T., Asadi N., Jadid L., Kazerooni M., Ghanadi A., Ghaffarpasand F., Kazerooni Y., Zolghadr J.: Evaluation of sperm’s chromatin quality with acridine orange test, chromomycin A3 and aniline blue staining in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009, 26, 591-596.10.1007/s10815-009-9361-3279955819894107Search in Google Scholar

18. Kim H.S., Kang M.J., Kim S.A., Oh S.K., Kim H., Ku S.Y., Kim S.H., Moon S.Y., Choi Y.M.: The utility of sperm DNA damage assay using toluidine blue and aniline blue staining in routine semen analysis. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2013, 40, 23-28.10.5653/cerm.2013.40.1.23363028923614112Search in Google Scholar

19. Maree L., du Plessis S.S., Menkveld R., van der Horst G.: Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod 2010, 25, 1369-1382.10.1093/humrep/deq07520400771Search in Google Scholar

20. Menkveld R., El-Garem Y., Schill W.B., Henkel R.: Relationship between human sperm morphology and acrosomal function. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003, 20, 432-438.10.1023/A:1026288710638Search in Google Scholar

21. Molina J., Castilla J.A., Castano J.L., Fontes J., Mendoza N., Martinez L.: Chromatin status in human ejaculated spermatozoa from infertile patients and relationship to seminal parameters. Hum Reprod 2001, 16, 534-539.10.1093/humrep/16.3.53411228225Search in Google Scholar

22. Oral E., Yetis O., Elibol F., Senol H., Irez T., Aksu F.M.: Assessment of human sperm morphology by strict criteria, comparison of wet preparation versus stained with the modified Diff-Quik method. Arch Androl 2002, 48, 307-314.10.1080/0148501029003162812137592Search in Google Scholar

23. Piasecka M.: Morphology and function of sperm mitochondria and male fertility. Part I. Normal morphology and function of sperm mid-piece. Post Biol Kom 2004, 31, 489-516.Search in Google Scholar

24. Schulte R.T., Ohl D.A., Sigman M., Smith G.D.: Sperm DNA damage in male infertility, etiologies, assays, and outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010, 27, 3-12.10.1007/s10815-009-9359-x282662620012685Search in Google Scholar

25. Spanò M., Cordelli E., Leter G., Lombardo F., Lenzi A., Gandini L.: Nuclear chromatin variations in human spermatozoa undergoing swim-up and cryopreservation evaluated by the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay. Mol Hum Reprod 1999, 5, 29-37.10.1093/molehr/5.1.2910050659Search in Google Scholar

26. Sutovsky P., Manandhar G.: Mammalian spermatogenesis and sperm structure, anatomical and compartmental analysis. In: The sperm cell. Production, maturation, fertilization, regeneration, edited by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006, pp. 1 -31.Search in Google Scholar