[
1. Al-Anzi, F. S., AbuZeina, D. (2017), “Toward an enhanced Arabic text classification using cosine similarity and Latent Semantic Indexing”, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 189-195.10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.04.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Ali Hassan, M. I., Twinomurinzi, H. (2018), “A Systematic Literature Review of Open Government Data Research: Challenges, Opportunities and Gaps”, 2018 Open Innovations Conference (OI), pp. 299–304.10.1109/OI.2018.8535794
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., Auer, S. (2015), “A systematic review of open government data initiatives”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 399–418.10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., Choi, H. (2014), “Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendations”, Information Polity, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 5-16.10.3233/IP-140328
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Boyne, G. A. (2002), “Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 97-122.10.1111/1467-6486.00284
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Buchanan, C. P. (1972), “Organizational Development as a Process Strategy for Change”, Educational Technology, Vol. 12 No. 10, pp. 10-14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Campos, R., Mangaravite, V., Pasquali, A., Jatowt, A., Jorge, A., Nunes, C., Jatowt, A. (2020), “YAKE! Keyword Extraction from Single Documents using Multiple Local Features”, Information Sciences Journal, Vol. 509, pp. 257-289.10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Chatfield, A., Reddick, C. Al-Zubaidi, W. (2015), “Capability Challenges in Transforming Government through Open and Big Data: Tales of Two Cities”, Published in ICIS 2015, available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4558/e6a25bbb045dbe0f8f9c23bc75eb20e49f4e.pdf (Mar 15 2022)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Crossan, M. M., Apaydin, M. (2009), “A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 1154-1191.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Crusoe, J. Melin, U. (2018), “Investigating Open Government Data Barriers: A Literature Review and Conceptualization”, Published in International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV 2018), pp. 169-183.10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Csáki, C., Kő, A. (2018), “Open Data Research Challenges in the EU”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 192-204.10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Damanpour, F., Schneider, M. (2008), “Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 495-522.10.1093/jopart/mun021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. De Oliveira, E. F., Silveira, M. S. (2018), “Open government data in Brazil a systematic review of its uses and issues”, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Governance in the Data Age - Dgo ‘18, pp. 1-9.10.1145/3209281.3209339
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Demšar, J., Zupan, B., Leban, G., Curk, T. (2004), “Orange: From Experimental Machine Learning to Interactive Data Mining”, Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD 2004, pp. 537-539.10.1007/978-3-540-30116-5_58
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Elliott, I. C. (2020), “Organisational learning and change in a public sector context”, Teaching Public Administration, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 270-283.10.1177/0144739420903783
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., Pardo, T. A. (2020), “Beyond Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration? A Reflection on the Dimensions of Open Government”, Public Performance Management Review, pp. 1-20.10.1080/15309576.2020.1734726
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Haini, S. I., Rahim, N. Z. A., Zainuddin, N. M. M. (2019), “Adoption of Open Government Data in Local Government Context: Conceptual Model Development”, Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications - ICCTA 2019, pp. 193-198.10.1145/3323933.3324092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., … Pardo, T. (2011), “Open Government and e-government: Democratic Challenges From a Public Value Perspective”, in Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times - Dg.o ‘11, pp. 83-97.10.1145/2037556.2037597
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Hossain, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P. (2015), “State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda”, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 26 No. 1-2, pp. 14-40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Huang, A. (2008), “Similarity Measures for Text Document Clustering”, Proceedings of the New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference (NZCSRSC) 2008, pp. 49-56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Huang, R., Lai, T., Zhou, L. (2017), “Proposing a Framework of Barriers to Opening Government Data in China: A Critical Literature Review”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 421-438.10.1108/LHT-01-2017-0014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Ingrams, A. (2016), “An Analytic Framework for Open Government Policy Design Processes”, in Proceedings of 15th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, pp. 203-214.10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Jetzek, T., Avital, M. Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013), “Generating value from open government data”, in Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design, available at https://dblp.org/db/conf/icis/icis2013.html (Feb 1 2022)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K. (2011), “A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data”, International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 266-285.10.1504/IJWET.2011.040725
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Kassen, M. (2013), “Globalisation of e-government: open government as a global agenda; benefits, limitations and ways forward”, Information Development, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 51-58.10.1177/0266666912473620
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Katbi, A.-K., Al-Ammary, J. (2019), “Open Government Data in Kingdom of Bahrain: Towards an Effective Implementation Framework”, New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 699-715.10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_66
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Kitchenham, B. (2004), “Procedures for performing systematic reviews”, Keele, UK, Keele University, Vol. 33, pp. 1-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Lewin, K. (1947), “Group decision and social change”, in Newcomb T. M., Hartley E. L. (Eds.), Readings in Social Psychology, New York, Henry Holt, pp. 330-344.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Lin, Y.-S., Jiang, J.-Y., Lee, S.-J. (2014), “A Similarity Measure for Text Classification and Clustering”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 1575-1590.10.1109/TKDE.2013.19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Lourenço, R. P. (2015), “An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 323-332.10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Marčeta, M. Bojnec, Š. (2020), “Drivers of Global Competitiveness in the European Union Countries in 2014 and 2017”, Organizacija Journal, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 37-52.10.2478/orga-2020-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Maxwell, A., Osae-Larbi, A. J. (2015), “Organization Development Models: A Critical Review and Implications for Creating Learning Organizations”, European Journal of Training and Development Studies, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 29-43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Moon, M. J. (2002), “The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 424-433.10.1111/0033-3352.00196
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Murtagh, F., Contreras, P. (2011), “Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview”, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 86-97.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Nam, T. (2012), “Citizens’ attitudes toward Open Government and Government 2.0”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 78 No. 2, pp. 346-368.10.1177/0020852312438783
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Nugroho, R., Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M. de Jong, M. (2015), “A comparison of national open data policies: lessons learned”, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 286-308.10.1108/TG-03-2014-0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Peters, T., Watterman, H. R. (1982), In Search of Excellence, HarperCollins Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Pettigrew, A. M. (1973), The Politics of Organisational Decision Making, London, Tavistock.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Roa, H. N., Loza-Aguirre, E., Flores, P. (2019), “A Survey on the Problems Affecting the Development of Open Government Data Initiatives”, in 2019 Sixth International Conference on eDemocracy eGovernment (ICEDEG), pp. 157-163.10.1109/ICEDEG.2019.8734452
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Safarov, I., Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017), “Utilisation of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users”, Information Polity, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 1-24.10.3233/IP-160012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Saif, H., Fernández, M., He, Y. Alani, H. (2014), “On stopwords, filtering and data sparsity for sentiment analysis of Twitter”, in LREC 2014, Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Proceedings, pp. 810-817.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Saxena, S. (2018), “Summarising the decadal literature in open government data (OGD) research: a systematic review”, Foresight, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 648-664.10.1108/FS-07-2018-0074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Sprecher, M. H. (2000), “Racing to E-government: Using the Internet for Citizen Service Delivery”, Government Finance Review, Vol. 16, pp. 21-22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Susha, I., Johannesson, P., Juell-Skielse, G. (2016), “Open Data Research in the Nordic Region: Towards a Scandinavian Approach?”, Electronic Government, pp. 61-73.10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K. (2006), “The effects of E-government on trust and confidence in government”, Public administration review, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 354-369.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Tsoukas, H. Chia, R. (2002), “On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change”, Organization Science, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 567-582.10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Van de Ven, A. H., Poole, M. S. (1995), “Explaining Development and Change in Organisations”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 510-540.10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Van der Maaten, L. Hinton G. (2008), “Visualizing Data using t-SNE”, Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 9 No. 86, pp. 2579-2605.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Vetrò, A., Canova, L., Torchiano, Orozco Minotas, C., Iemma, R., Morando, F. (2016), “Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 325-337.10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Walker, R. M., Andrews, R. (2013), “Local Government Management and Performance: A Review of Evidence”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 101-133.10.1093/jopart/mut038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Webster, J., Watson, R. T. (2002), “Analysing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 13-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Weick, K. E., Quinn, R. E. (1999), “Organizational Change and Development”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 361-386.10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Welle Donker, F., van Loenen, B. (2017), “How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem?”, International Journal of Digital Earth, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 284-306.10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. West, D. M. (2004), “E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 15-27.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Wirtz, B. W., Piehler, R., Thomas, M.-J., Daiser, P. (2015), “Resistance of Public Personnel to Open Government: A cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data”, Public Management Review, Vol. 18 No. 9, pp. 1335-1364.10.1080/14719037.2015.1103889
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Yuan, Q. (2019), “Co-production of Public Service and Information Technology”, in Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2019), pp. 123-132.10.1145/3325112.3325232
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Zuiderwijk, A., Hinnant, C. C. (2019), “Open data policy-making: A review of the state-ofthe-art and an emerging research agenda”, Information Polity, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 1-13.10.3233/IP-190160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Davis, C. (2014), “Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems”, Information Polity, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 17-33.10.3233/IP-140329
]Search in Google Scholar
