1. bookVolume 12 (2021): Issue 1 (May 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Sep 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Collaborative Strategic View in Corporate Social Responsibility – Construction Industry Case

Published Online: 04 Jun 2021
Page range: 144 - 163
Received: 19 Aug 2020
Accepted: 08 Sep 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Sep 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Background: The incorporation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) into the business strategy of construction firms boosts their corporate reputation, while at the same time reduces the risk and the external pressure for minimizing a negative societal footprint.

Objectives: This study aims to determine the current state of CSR in the Croatian construction industry, in terms of knowing and practicing, and to offer a collaborative strategic view as a viable CSR approach.

Methods/Approach: A survey research among large Croatian construction companies regarding CSR in the context of collaboration with stakeholders was carried out and the results were analyzed using the multidimensional unfolding procedure.

Results: Results show that for the Croatian construction companies CSR activities are important, but they are not widely seen as a benefit to overall business strategies yet.

Conclusions: Results of the research could be helpful to construction firms in the efficient and effective stakeholder engagement, as well as in the development of the calibrated CSR strategy.

Keywords

JEL Classification

1. Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. (2012), “What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda”, Journal of Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 932–968. Search in Google Scholar

2. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., Zhou, J. (2014), “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework”, Journal of Management, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 1297-1333. Search in Google Scholar

3. Andriof, J., Waddock, S. (2002), “Unfolding stakeholder Engagement”, in Sutherland Rahman, S., Waddock, S., Andriof, J., Husted, B. (Ed.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking, Greenleaf, London, UK. Search in Google Scholar

4. Atli, D., Vidovic, M., Omazic, M. A. (2018), “Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on the Web: A Content Analysis of Sustainability Reports in World’s Best Multinational Workplaces”, International Journal of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 1-17. Search in Google Scholar

5. Augier, M., Teece, D. J. (2009), “Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance”, Organization Science, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 410-421. Search in Google Scholar

6. Barraket, J., Keast, R., Furneaux, C. (2016), Social procurement and new public governance, Routledge, London. Search in Google Scholar

7. Barthorpe, S. (2010), “Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry”, Property Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 4-17. Search in Google Scholar

8. Bondy, K. (2008), “The paradox of power in CSR: A case study on implementation”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 82 No. 2, pp. 307-323. Search in Google Scholar

9. Borg, I., Groenen, P. J. F. (2005), Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, 2nd Ed., Springer, New York, USA. Search in Google Scholar

10. Buallay, A. (2019), “Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector”, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 98-115. Search in Google Scholar

11. Carroll, A. B. (1991), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 39–48. Search in Google Scholar

12. Choi, J., Wang, H. (2009), “Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30 No. 8, pp. 895-907. Search in Google Scholar

13. Dyer, J.H., Singh, H. (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 660-679. Search in Google Scholar

14. Edum-Fotwe, F. T., McCaffer, R. (2000), “Developing project management competency: perspectives from the construction industry”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 111-124. Search in Google Scholar

15. EU (2014), “Directive 2014/95/EU” available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from=EN (18 June 2020). Search in Google Scholar

16. European Construction Industry Federation (2019), “Key figures activity in 2018”, FIEC Search in Google Scholar

17. Hamel, G., Zanini, M. (2014), “Build a change platform, not a change program”, Mckinsey & Company, available at http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/Organization, (11 November 2014). Search in Google Scholar

18. Harrison, J. S., St. John, C. H. (1996), “Managing and Partnering with External Stakeholders”, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 46-60. Search in Google Scholar

19. Hillenbrand, C., Money, K. (2007), “Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Reputation: Two Separate Concepts or Two Sides of the Same Coin?”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 10, pp. 261–277. Search in Google Scholar

20. Huxham, C. (2003), “Theorizing Collaboration Practice, Public Management Review, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 401-423. Search in Google Scholar

21. Huxham, C., Macdonald, D. (1992), “Introducing collaborative advantage: Achieving interorganizational effectiveness through meta-strategy”, Management Decision, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 50–56. Search in Google Scholar

22. IBM (2020), “Multidimensional Unfolding (PREFSCAL), available at https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_25.0.0/statistics_mainhelp_ddita/spss/categories/idh_prfs.html /(18 June 2020). Search in Google Scholar

23. Jiang, W., Wong, J. (2016), “Key activity areas of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry: A study of China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 113, pp. 850-860. Search in Google Scholar

24. Keys, T., Malnight, T. W., van der Graaf, K. (2009), “Making the most of corporate social responsibility”, McKinsey Quarterly, pp. 1-8. Search in Google Scholar

25. King, B. G., Walker, E. T. (2014), “Winning Hearts and Minds: Field Theory and the Three Dimensions of Strategy”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 134-141. Search in Google Scholar

26. Liyanage, C., Ulutas¸ D. D., Giritli, H., McDermott, P. (2016), “Corporate social responsibility in construction industry: a comparative study between UK and Turkey”, Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 218-231. Search in Google Scholar

27. Mahon, J. F. (2002), “Corporate reputation: Research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature”, Business and Society, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 415-445. Search in Google Scholar

28. Makadok, R. (2003), “Doing the right thing and knowing the right thing to do: why the whole is greater than the sum of the parts”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 10, pp. 1043-1055. Search in Google Scholar

29. McKinsey Quarterly (2020a), “Purpose: Shifting from why to how”, April, 2020, available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/organization/our%20insights/purpose%20shifting%20from%20why%20to%20how/purpose-shifting-from-why-to-how-v3.pdf?shouldIndex=false (10 May 2021) Search in Google Scholar

30. McKinsey Quarterly (2020b), “The pivotal factor for effective external engagement”, May, 2020, available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/strategy%20and%20corporate%20finance/our%20insights/the%20pivotal%20factors%20for%20effective%20external%20engagement/the-pivotal-factors-for-effective-external-engagement.pdf?shouldIndex=false (10 May 2021) Search in Google Scholar

31. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Wood, D. J. (1997), “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 853–886. Search in Google Scholar

32. Morsing, M., Schultz, M. (2006), “Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies”, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 323-338. Search in Google Scholar

33. Pettigrew A. M. (1987), “Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 649–670. Search in Google Scholar

34. Sev, A. (2009), “How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A conceptual framework”, Sustainable Development, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 161-173. Search in Google Scholar

35. Shen, L.-Y., Tam, V. W., Tam, L. Tam, Ji, Y.-B. (2010), “Project feasibility study: the key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 254-259. Search in Google Scholar

36. Sminia, H., de Rond, M. (2012), “Context and Action in the Transformation of Strategy Scholarship”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 49 No. 7, pp. 1329–1349. Search in Google Scholar

37. Stainer, A., Stainer, L. (1998), “Business Performance – a Stakeholder Approach”, International Journal of Business Performance Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2-12. Search in Google Scholar

38. Staurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., Martinuzzi, A. (2005), “Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business-Society Relations”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 61, pp. 263-281. Search in Google Scholar

39. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., Waddock, S. (2010), “Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 463-490. Search in Google Scholar

40. Tam., V. W. Y., Shen, L. Y., Yau, R. M. Y., Tam, C. M. (2007), “Assessing the levels of material wastage affected by sub-contracting relationships and projects types with their correlations”, Building Environment, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 1471-1477. Search in Google Scholar

41. Teece, D. J. (2007), “Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 13, pp. 1319-1350. Search in Google Scholar

42. Tipuric, D., Tomsic, D. (2016), “Collaborative strategies to heal the competitive paradigm shortcuts”, Tipuric, D., Kovac, I. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship: New Governance for Value Creation, Towards Stakeholding and Participation Zagreb: CIRU - Governance research and Development Centre, pp. 1247-1260. Search in Google Scholar

43. Tomsic, D. (2013a), “The Role of Firm Reputation in Corporate Governance Processes”, Tipurić, D., Podrug, N. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International OFEL Conference on Corporate Governance, Zagreb: CIRU - Governance research and Development Centre, pp. 845-862. Search in Google Scholar

44. Tomsic, D. (2013b), “Towards Relational View of Corporate Governance”, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 71-87. Search in Google Scholar

45. United Nations Global Compact (2016), “Guide to Corporate Sustainability, Shaping a sustainable future”, available at https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/docs/publications%2FUN_Global_Compact_Guide_to_Corporate_Sustainability.pdf (30 January 2020) Search in Google Scholar

46. Vaara E., Durand, R. (2012), 2How to make strategy research connect with broader issues that matter?”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 248-255. Search in Google Scholar

47. Vishwanathan, P., van Oosterhout, H. J., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Duran, P., van Essen, M. (2020), “Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 314-350. Search in Google Scholar

48. Waddock, S. (2003), “Stakeholder performance implications of corporate responsibility”, International Journal of Performance Management, Vol. 5 No. 2/3, pp. 114–124. Search in Google Scholar

49. Whittington, R. (2012), “Big Strategy/Small Strategy”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 263-268. Search in Google Scholar

50. Wu, M., Eweje, G. (2008), “Stakeholder engagement as a facilitator of organizational learning”, Department of Management and International Business Research Working Paper Series 2008, no. 1. Auckland, NZ: Massey University Search in Google Scholar

51. Xia, B., Olanipekun, A., Chen, Q., Xie, L., Liu, Y. (2018), “Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 195, pp. 340-353. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo