1. bookVolume 10 (2019): Issue 1 (April 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1847-9375
First Published
19 Sep 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Health Technology Assessment: The Role of Total Cost of Ownership

Published Online: 09 May 2019
Page range: 180 - 187
Received: 10 Dec 2017
Accepted: 20 Feb 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1847-9375
First Published
19 Sep 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Background: Recently the European Union, through its Horizon 2020 fund has awarded numerous research projects tasked with the development of cloud-based health technology solutions. A number of these projects have a specific focus on ambient assisted living (AAL) technologies; solutions that offer a unique opportunity to improve the quality of life of persons with mild cognitive impairments. The diffusion of these solutions across a European wide cloud infrastructure presents a novel opportunity to reduce economic pressures currently experienced by European health systems. However, no route to market framework currently exists for a European wide healthcare delivery system. Objectives: The goal of the paper is to conduct the review and develop the literature around technology assessment for AAL technologies and route to market frameworks. Methods/Approach: We highlight the role of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) when conducting a technology assessment by reviewing existent literature. Results: We discuss three TCO models that can support the assessment of AAL technologies. Conclusions: There is a gap in the analysis of TCO models in the context of AAL technologies particularly in public and private sector collaborations. TCO process should be developed into a key award criterion when conducting AAL technology assessment and procurements, thus aiding long term strategic decision making.

Keywords

1. Angst, C. M., Agarwal, R. (2009), “Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 339-370.10.2307/20650295Search in Google Scholar

2. Bittner, A. K., Wykstra, S. L., Yoshinaga, P. D., Li, T. (2015), “Telerehabilitation for people with low vision”, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 8.10.1002/14651858.CD011019.pub2Search in Google Scholar

3. Bryman, A., Bell, E. (2007), Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

4. Caldwell, N., Bakker, E., Read, J. (2007), “The purchasing process in public procurement”, in Knight, L., Harland, C., Telgen, J, Callender, G., McKen, J. (Eds.), Public Procurement International Cases and Commentary, England, Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

5. Carr, L. P., Ittner, C. D. (1992), “Measuring the cost of ownership”, Journal of Cost Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 42-51.Search in Google Scholar

6. Central Statistics Office (2012), Profile 2: Older and Younger, Dublin: Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cusack, C. M., Byrne, C., Hook, J. M., McGowan, J., Poon, E. G., Zafar, A. (2009), “A Health Information Technology Evaluation Toolkit: 2009 Update”, AHRQ Publication, No. 9, pp. 1-59.Search in Google Scholar

8. D’Arcy, J., Hovav, A. and Galletta, D. (2009), “User awareness of security countermeasures and its impact on information systems misuse: A deterrence approach”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 79-98.10.1287/isre.1070.0160Search in Google Scholar

9. Ellram, L. M. (1995), “Total cost of ownership: An analysis approach for purchasing”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 4-23.10.1108/09600039510099928Search in Google Scholar

10. Ellram, L. M., Siferd, S. P. (1998), “Total Cost of Ownership: A key concept in Strategic Cost Management Decisions”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 55-84.Search in Google Scholar

11. Eurostat (2011), “Population projections”, European Commission, available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Population_projections (7 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

12. Frontera, W. R., Bean, J. F, Damiano, D., Ehrlich-Jones, L., Fried-Oken, M., Jette, A., Jung, R., Lieber, R. L., Malec, J. F., Mueller, M. J., Ottenbacher, K. J., Tansey, K. E., Thompson, A. (2017), “Rehabilitation Research at the National Institutes of Health : Moving the Field Forward (Executive Summary)”, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 1–12.10.5014/ajot.2017.713003Search in Google Scholar

13. Glynn, L. Casey, M., Walsh, J., Hayes, P. S., Harte, R. P., Heaney, D. (2015), “Patients’ views and experiences of technology based self-management tools for the treatment of hypertension in the community: A qualitative study”, BMC Family Practice, Vol. 16, No. 1.10.1186/s12875-015-0333-7Search in Google Scholar

14. Health Information & Quality Authority (2017), “HIQA publishes guide to health technology assessment”, available at: https://www.hiqa.ie/hiqa-news-updates/hiqa-publishes-guidehealth-technology-assessment (25 November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

15. Health Information & Quality Authority (2010), “Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies in Ireland”, available at: https://www.ispor.org/peguidelines/source/Ireland_Economic_Guidelines_2010.pdf (25 November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

16. Harris, P. R., Sillence, E., Briggs, P. (2011), “Perceived Threat and Corroboration: Key Factors That Improve a Predicitive Model of Trust in Internet-based Health Information and Advice”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 13, No. 3.10.2196/jmir.1821Search in Google Scholar

17. Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L. (2013), “Internet privacy concerns: An integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 275-298.10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.12Search in Google Scholar

18. Hurkens, K., Wynstra, F, (2006), “The concept “Total Value of Ownership”: A case study approach”, available at: www.iimm.org/knowledge_bank/IFPSM (7 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

19. INAHTA (2017), “Health Technology Assessment”, available at: http://www.inahta.org/hta (25 November 17)Search in Google Scholar

20. Jacquemard, T., Novitzky, P., O’Brolcháin, F., Smeaton, A. F., Gordijn, B. (2014), “Challenges and opportunities of lifelog technologies: a literature review and critical analysis”, Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 379-409.10.1007/s11948-013-9456-1Search in Google Scholar

21. Janssen, R., Hettinga, M., Prins, H., Visser, S., Mengo, R., Krediet, I., Haaker, T., Bodenstaff, L. (2013), “Developing evidence guidelines for eHealth small and medium-sized enterprises”, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine (eTELEMED), pp. 92-95.Search in Google Scholar

22. Jesson, J., Matheson, L., Lacey, F. M. (2011), Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques, SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kidholm, K., Ekeland, A. G., Jensen, L. K., Rasmussen, J., Pedersen, C. D., Bowes, A., Flottorp. S. A., Bech, M. (2012), “Model for Assessment of Telemedicine Applications: Mast”, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 44-51.10.1017/S0266462311000638Search in Google Scholar

24. Leenders, M., Johnson, F., Flynn, A., Fearon, H. (2006), Purchasing and Supply Management, 13th edition, New York, Irwin McGraw Hill.Search in Google Scholar

25. National Institute for Health Research (2017), “Health Technology Assessment”, available at: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding-and-support/funding-for-research-studies/funding-programmes/health-technology-assessment/ (25 November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

26. National Library of Medicine (2004), “HTA 101: Introduction to Health Technology Assessment”, available at: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/hta101/ta10103.html (25 November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

27. Novitzky, P., Smeaton, A. F., Chen, C., Irving, K., Jacquemard, T., O’Brolcháin, F., O’Mathúna, D., Gordijn, B. (2015), “A Review of Contemporary Work on the Ethics of Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for People with Dementia”, Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 707-765.10.1007/s11948-014-9552-xSearch in Google Scholar

28. O’Donnell, J. C., Pham, S. V., Pashos, C. L., Miller, D. W., Smith, M. D. (2009), “Health Technology Assessment: Lessons Learned from Around the World—An Overview”, Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. S1-S5.10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00550.xSearch in Google Scholar

29. SBJ (2011), “Statistical handbook of Japan 2011”, Statistics Bureau and the Director-General for Policy Planning of Japan, available at: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/index.htm (7 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

30. Shin, H., Benton, W. C. (2007), “A quantity discount approach to supply chain coordination”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 180, No. 2, pp. 601-616.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.033Search in Google Scholar

31. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., Burke, S. J. (1996), “Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns about Organizational Practices”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 167-196.10.2307/249477Search in Google Scholar

32. Statista (2015), “Statistics and facts about mobile app usage”, available at: http://www.statista.com/topics/1002/mobile-app-usage (22 June 2016).Search in Google Scholar

33. Van Weele, A. J. (2004), Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 4th edition, Cengage Learning Business Press.Search in Google Scholar

34. World Health Organisation (2016), “From Innovation to Implementation: eHealth in the WHO European Region”, available at: http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/from-innovation-to-implementation-ehealth-in-the-who-european-region-2016 (7 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

35. World Health Organisation (2017), “Health technology assessment”, available at: http://www.who.int/medical_devices/assessment/en (7 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo