[
Andrighetto, G., Zhang, N., Ottone, S., Ponzano, F., D’Attoma, J., & Steinmo, S. (2016). Are Some Countries More Honest than Others? Evidence from a Tax Compliance Experiment in Sweden and Italy. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00472.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Champiri, Z.D., Fisher, B., Kiong, L.C., & Danaee, M. (2020). How contextual data influences user experience with scholarly recommender systems: An empirical framework. In HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: User Experience Design and Case Studies, 635-661. Springer International Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohn, M. (2020, April 17). Organizations lose 5 percent of revenue to fraud every year. Accounting Today, available at: https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/organizations-lose-5-of-revenue-to-fraud-every-year.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dogruel, L., Masur, P., & Joeckel, S. (2021). Development and validation of an algorithm literacy scale for internet users. Communication Methods and Measures, Vol. 16, Issue 2, 115-133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1968361.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garmaise, M.J. (2015). Borrower misreporting and loan performance. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 70, Issue 1, 449-484. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12156.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grzymek, V., Puntschuh, M., & Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2019). What Europe knows and thinks about algorithms: Results of a representative survey. Discussion Paper Ethics of Algorithms, available at: https://doi.org/10.11586/2019008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henle, C.A., Dineen, B.R., & Duffy, M.K. (2019). Assessing intentional resume deception: Development and nomological network of a resume fraud measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 34, Issue 1, 87-106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9527-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herm, L.-V., Heinrich, K., Wanner, J., & Janiesch, C. (2023). Stop ordering machine learning algorithms by their explainability! A user-centered investigation of performance and explainability. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 69, 102538. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102538.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hydock, C. (2018). Assessing and overcoming participant dishonesty in online data collection. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 50, Issue 4, 1563-1567. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0984-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
König, P.D., Wurster, S., & Siewert, M.B. (2022). Consumers are willing to pay a price for explainable, but not for green AI. Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis. Big Data & Society, Vol. 9, Issue 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211069632.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leal, S., Vrij, A., Nahari, G., & Mann, S. (2016). Please be honest and provide Evidence: Deterrents of deception in an online insurance fraud context. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 30, Issue 5, 768-774. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3252.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, M.K. (2018). Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, Vol. 5, Issue 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, K., & Xiao, W. (2022). Who will help to strive against the “infodemic”? Reciprocity norms enforce the information sharing accuracy of the individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.919321.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, Y., & Liu, Z. (2021). Involvement modulates the effects of deception on memory in daily life. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756297.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mahmud, H., Islam, A.K.M.N., Ahmed, S.I., & Smolander, K. (2022). What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121390.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), Vol. 45, Issue 6, 633-644. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nitto, H., Taniyama, D., & Inagaki, H. (2017). Social acceptance and impact of robots and artificial intelligence: Findings of survey in Japan, the U.S. and Germany. NRI Papers, Vol. 211, 1-17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, E.J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker (pp. xiii, 330). Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173933.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramokapane, K.M., Misra, G., Such, J., & Preibusch, S. (2021). Truth or dare: Understanding and predicting how users lie and provide untruthful data online. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445625.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sandoval, E.B., Brandstetter, J., Obaid, M., & Bartneck, C. (2016). Reciprocity in human-robot interaction: A quantitative approach through the prisoner’s dilemma and the ultimatum game. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 8, Issue 2, 303-317. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0323-x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shin, D. (2020a). How do users interact with algorithm recommender systems? The interaction of users, algorithms, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106344.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shin, D. (2020b). User perceptions of algorithmic decisions in the personalized AI system: Perceptual evaluation of fairness, accountability, transparency, and explainability. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol. 64, Issue 4, 541-565. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shin, D., & Park, Y.J. (2019). Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 98, 277-284. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Srour, C., & Py, J. (2022). The general theory of deception: A disruptive theory of lie production, prevention, and detection. Psychological Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000389.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Srour, C., & Py, J. (2023). Making job candidates more honest with a theory-based form: A field study. Journal of Personnel Psychology, Vol. 22, Issue 2, 89-98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000313.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tseng, L.-M. (2019). Customer insurance frauds: The influence of fraud type, moral intensity and fairness perception. Managerial Finance, Vol. 45, Issue 3, 452-467. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MF-04-2018-0162.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Upadhyaya, N., & Galizzi, M. (2023). In bot we trust? Personality traits and reciprocity in human-bot trust games. Frontiers in Behavioral Economics, Vol. 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/frbhe.2023.1164259.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Der Zee, S., Anderson, R., & Poppe, R. (2016). When Lying Feels the Right Thing to Do. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00734.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willson, M. (2017). Algorithms (and the) everyday. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 20, Issue 1, 137-150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645.
]Search in Google Scholar
