[
Ali, H. A. E. M, Al-Sulaihi, I. A., and Al-Gahtani, K. S. (2013). Indicators for Measuring Performance of Building Construction Companies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 25(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2012.03.00210.1016/j.jksues.2012.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bowen, F. E., Rostami, M., & Steel, P. (2010). Timing is Everything: A Meta-analysis of the Relationships between Organisational Performance and Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1179–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.01410.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, 3rd edition. Routledge.10.4324/9781315757421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, I. Y., and Liu, A. M. (2012). Antecedents of Innovation Climate in Construction Firms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Construction Management, 12(4), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2012.1077319910.1080/15623599.2012.10773199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Damanpour, F. (2010). An Integration of Research Findings of Effects of Firm Size and Market Competition on Product and Process Innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doloi, H., Iyer, K. C., and Sawhney, A. (2011). Structural Equation Model for Assessing Impacts of Contractor’s Performance on Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.00710.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evangelista, R. and Vezzani, A. (2010). The Economic Impact of Technological and Management Innovations: A Firm-Level Analysis. Research Policy, 39(10), 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.00410.1016/j.respol.2010.08.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gauthier, J., and Wooldridge, B. (2012). Influences on Sustainable Innovation Adoption: Evidence from Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71610.1002/bse.716
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glick, W. H., Washburn, N. T., and Miller, C. C. (2005). The Myth of Firm Performance. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of American Academy of Management. Honolulu, Hawaii.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl03310.1093/poq/nfl033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Edition, 7th Ed. Pearson Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hassan, M. U., Shaukat, S., Nawaz, M. S., and Naz, S. (2013). Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study on Pakistan’s Manufacturing Sector. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 7(2), 243–262.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karabulut, A. T. (2015). Effect of Innovation Types on Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 195, 1355–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.32210.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.322
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kazaz, A., Manisali, E., and Ulubeyli, S. (2008). Effect of Basic Motivational Factors on Construction Workforce Productivity in Turkey. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.410.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lilja, R. (2009). Negotiated Environmental Agreements in Promoting Material Efficiency in industry – First Steps in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(9), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.01.00210.1016/j.jclepro.2009.01.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, J. H. and Roper, S. (2015). SME Innovation, Exporting and Growth: A Review of Existing Evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/026624261455019010.1177/0266242614550190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mafini, C. (2015). Predicting Organisational Performance Through Innovation, Quality And Inter-Organisational Systems: A Public Sector Perspective. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(3), 939–952. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v31i3.922710.19030/jabr.v31i3.9227
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molenaar, K., Washington, S., and Diekmann, J. (2000). Structural Equation Model of Construction Contract Dispute Potential. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(4), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(268)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(268)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moohammad, A. Y., Aini, Y. N., and Kamal, E. M. (2014). Influences of Firm Size, Age and Sector on Innovation Behaviour of Construction Consultancy Services Organizations in Developing Countries. Business Management Dynamics, 4(4), 01–09.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rukundo, J. B. (2017). Firm Performance and Innovation in the Developing Countries: Evidence from Firm -Level Survey, Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-1), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c1p710.22495/cocv15i1c1p7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, J. B. and Brito, L. A. L. (2012). Toward a Subjective Measurement Model for Firm Performance. BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev. 9(no. Rio de Janeiro), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-7692201200050000710.1590/S1807-76922012000500007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shen, L. Y., Tam, W. Y., Tam, L., and Ji, Y.-B. (2010). Project Feasibility Study: the key to Successful Implementation of Sustainable and Socially Responsible Construction Management Practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(3), 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.01410.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schilling, M. A. (2013). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shumacker, R. and Lomax, R. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modelling, 2nd edition, Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K and Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An Overview of Sustainability Assessment Methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.01110.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tam, W. Y. V. (2008). On the Effectiveness of Implementing a Waste-Management-Plan Method in Construction. Waste Management, 28(6), 1072–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.00710.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., and Devece, C. A. (2011). Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: Mediating Role of Planning and Control. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq04310.1093/jopart/muq043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yusof, N., Kamal, E. M., Kong-Seng, L., and Iranmanesh, M. (2014). Are Innovations Being Created or Adopted in the Construction Industry? Business Administration and Business Economics, Economic Development, Strategic Management Organizational Theory & Business Policy. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401455242410.1177/2158244014552424
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zulu, S. L. (2007). The Impact of Project Management Process Quality on Construction Project Performance: A Structural Equation Model. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh.
]Search in Google Scholar
