[1. Fryns JP, van den Berghe H. Paracentric inversion in man: personal experience and review of the literature. Hum Genet. 1980; 54(3): 413-416.10.1007/BF00291590]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Hook EB, Schreinemachers DM, Willey AM, Cross PK. Inherited structural cytogenetic abnormalities detected incidentally in fetuses diagnosed prenatally: frequency, parental-age associations, sex-ratio trends and comparisons with rates of mutants. Am J Hum Genet. 1984; 36(2): 422-443.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Therman E. Human Chromosomes, Structure, Behavior, Effects. New York, NY: Springer- Verlag, 1980.10.1007/978-1-4684-0107-3]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 183 (Suppl 1): S55-S58.10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00578-0]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Worsham MJ, Miller DA, Devries JM, Mitchell AR, Babu VR, Surli V, et al. A dicentric recombinant 9 derived from a paracentric inversion: Phenotype, cytogenetics, and molecular analysis of centromeres. Am J Hum Genet. 1989; 44(1): 115-123.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Phelan MC, Stevenson RE, Anderson EV Jr. Recombinant chromosome 9 possibly derived from breakage and reunion of sister chromatids within a paracentric inversion loop. Am J Med Genet. 1993; 46(3): 304-308.10.1002/ajmg.13204603138488876]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Lefort G, Blanchet P, Belgrade N, Rivier F, Chaze AM, Sarda P, et al. Stable dicentric duplication-deficiency chromosome 14 resulting from crossing-over within a maternal paracentric inversion. Am J Med Genet A. 2003; 118A(2): 333-338.10.1002/ajmg.b.1072012457404]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Madan K. Paracentric inversions: A review. Hum Genet. 1995; 96(5): 503-515.10.1007/BF001974038529995]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Madan K, Nieuwint AW. Reproductive risks for paracentric inversion heterozygotes: Inver sion or insertion? That is the question. Am J Med Genet. 2002; 107(4): 340-343.10.1002/ajmg.1017311840494]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bhatt S, Moradkhani K, Mrasek K, Puechberty J, Manvelyan M, Hunstig F, et al. Breakpoint mapping and complete analysis of meiotic segregation patterns in three men heterozygous for paracentric inversions. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009; 17(1): 44-50.10.1038/ejhg.2008.144298595418685557]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Martin RH. Sperm chromosome analysis in a man heterozygous for a paracentric inversion of chromosome 7 (q11q22). Hum Genet. 1986; 73(2): 97-100.10.1007/BF002915943721507]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Brown GM, Leversha M, Hulten M, Ferguson- Smith MA, Affara NA, Furlong RA. Genetic analysis of meiotic recombination in humans by use of sperm typing: Reduced recombination within a heterozygous paracentric inversion of chromosome 9q32-q34.3. Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 62(6): 1484-1492.10.1086/30186313771429585591]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Martin RH. Sperm chromosome analysis in a man heterozygous for a paracentric inversion of chromosome 14 (q24.1q32.1). Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 64(5): 1480-1484.10.1086/302363]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Devine DH, Whitman-Elia G, Best RG, Edwards JG. Paternal paracentric inversion of chromosome 2: A possible association with recurrent pregnancy loss and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000; 17(5): 293-296.10.1023/A:1009466501616]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Anton E, Vidal F, Egozcue J, Blanco J. Genetic reproductive risk in inversion carriers. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(3): 661-666.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.023]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Vialard F, Delanete A, Clement P, Simon-Bouy B, Aubriot FX, Selva J. Sperm chromosome analysis in two cases of paracentric inversion. Fertil Steril. 2007; 87(2): 418.e1-418.e5.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.087]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kahraman S, Findikli N, Biricik A, Oncu N, Ogur C, Sertyel S, et al. Preliminary FISH studies on spermatozoa and embryos in patients with variable degrees of teratozoospermia and a history of poor prognosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006; 12(6): 752-761.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61087-5]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Martin RH, Rademaker A. Reliability of aneuploidy estimates in human sperm: Results of fluorescence in situ hybridization studies using two different scoring criteria. Mol Reprod. 1995; 42(1): 89-93.10.1002/mrd.1080420112]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Findikli N, Kahraman S, Kumtepe Y, Donmez E, Biricik A, Sertyel S, et al. Embryo devel opment characteristics in Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations: a comparison of results with non-translocation cases. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003; 7(5): 563-571.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62073-1]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992; 340(8810): 17-18.10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-F]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Greger V, Knoll JH, Wagstaff J, Woolf E, Lieske P, Glatt H, et al. Angelman syndrome associated with an inversion of chromosome 15q11.2q24.3. Am J Hum Genet. 1997; 60(3): 574-580.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Saito-Ohara F, Fukuda Y, Ito M, Agarwala KL, Hayashi M, Matsuo M, et al. The Xq22 inversion breakpoint interrupted a novel Ras-like GTPase gene in a patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and profound mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 71(3): 637-645.10.1086/34220837919912145744]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Anton E, Blanco J, Egozcue J, Vidal F. Sperm studies in heterozygote inversion carriers: A review. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 111(3-4): 297-304.10.1159/00008690316192708]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Morel F, Laudier B, Guérif F, Couet ML, Royère D, Roux C, et al. Meiotic segregation analysis in spermatozoa of pericentric inversion carriers using fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(1): 136-141.10.1093/humrep/del31716917123]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Bhatt SS, Manvelyan M, Moradkhani K, Hunstig F, Mrasek K, Puechberty J, et al. Inverted segment size and the presence of recombination hot spot clusters matter in sperm segregation analysis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2014; 142(2): 145-149.10.1159/00035614224217531]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Batanian J, Hulten MA. Electron microscopic investigations of synaptonemal complexes in an infertile human male carrier of a pericentric inversion inv(1) (p32q42). Regular loop formation but defective synapsis including a possible interchromosomal effect. Hum Genet. 1987; 76(1): 81-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7): 1925-1935. 10.1093/humrep/der08221489979]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Boklage CE. Survival probability of human conceptions from fertilization to term. Int J Fertil. 1990; 35 (2): 75, 79-80, 81-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Schmid M, Hofmann R, Köhler J, Jannek U. Familial paracentric inversion: inv(2)(q31q36). Hum Genet. 1985; 71(3): 270-272. 10.1007/BF002845904065899]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Donti E, Rosetti A, Carloni I, Venti Donti G. A new case of familial paracentric inversion of chromosome 2. Hum Genet. 1987; 75(2): 195.10.1007/BF005910873817813]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Lin CC, Bowen P, Hoo JJ. Familial paracentric inversions inv(2)(q31q35) and inv(8)(q22.3q24.13) ascertained through reproductive abnormalities. Hum Genet. 1987; 75(1): 84-87. 10.1007/BF00273848]Search in Google Scholar