[
1. Beliūnienė, Lina. Žmogaus teisių stiprinimas konstitucinio skundo institute. Vilnius: Justitia, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Birmontienė, Toma, et al. Konstituciniai ginčai. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Danėlienė, Ingrida. “Individual access to constitutional justice in Lithuania: the potential within the newly established model of the individual constitutional complaint.” Revista de Derecho Político 111 (2021): 282–311.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Dürr, Schnutz Rudolf. “Improving Human Rights Protection on the National and the European Levels – Individual Access to Constitutional Courts and the Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights” (2016) // https://www.academia.edu/36018234/D%C3%BCrr_Schnutz_Rudolf_Improving_Human_Rights_Protection_on_the_National_and_the_European_Levels_Individual_Access_to_Constitutional_Courts_and_the_Accession_of_the_European_Union_to_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights_Homenaje_a_Jean_Claude_Colliard_Tomo_II_Mexico_2016_pp_267_298?email_work_card=title.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Kūris, Egidijus. “On the Rule of Law and the Quality of the Law: Reflections of the Constitutional-Turned-International Judge.” Teoría y realidad constitucional 42 (2018) // DOI: 10.5944/trc.42.2018.23654.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
6. Mavčič, Arne Marjan. “Individual Complaint as a Domestic Remedy to be Exhausted or Effective within the Meaning of the ECHR: Comparative and Slovenian Aspect” (2011) // https://www.concourts.net/lecture/constitutional%20complaint1.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Nalyvaiko, Larysa, and Olha Chepik-Trehubenko. “Normative Model of the Constitutional Complaint: Domestic and Foreign Practice”. In: Larysa Nalyvaiko and Olha Chepik-Trehubenko. Normative model of the constitutional complaint domestic and foreign practice // http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/12928/Nalyvaiko%20L.%2C%20Chepik-Trehubenko%20O.%20Normative%20model%20of%20the%20constitutional%20complaint%20domestic%20and%20foreign%20practice%20.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Padskocimaite, Ausra. “Constitutional Courts and (Non)Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: A Comparison of Cases from Russia and Lithuania” (2017) // https://www.zaoerv.de/77_2017/77_2017_3_a_651_684.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Pūraitė-Andrikienė, Dovilė. “Advantages and Disadvantages of the Lithuanian Individual Constitutional Complaint Model.” Teisė 114 (2020): 49–70.10.15388/Teise.2020.114.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Pūraitė-Andrikienė, Dovilė. “Individual Constitutional Complaint as an Effective Instrument of Protection of Human Rights and Development of Constitutionalism.” Teisė 96 (2015): 201–224.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Pūraitė-Andrikienė, Dovilė. “The Effects of the Rulings of the Constitutional Court in Time.” Teisė 112 (2019): 70–90.10.15388/Teise.2019.112.4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania. “The Annual Report of the Constitutional Court for 2020” (2021) // https://www.lrkt.lt/data/public/uploads/2021/04/metinis-2020-web.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. The Council of Europe’s Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law. “The Guide to Good Practice in Respect of Domestic Remedies” (2013) // https://rm.coe.int/guide-to-good-practice-in-respect-of-domestic-remedies/1680695a9f.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. The ECtHR. “Annual Report of the European Court of Human Rights (2012)” (2013) // http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Annual_report_2012_ENG.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. The ECtHR. “Practical Guide on Admissibility Criteria” (2022) // https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/admissibility_guide_eng.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. The European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). “Revised Report on Individual Access to Constitutional Justice” (2020) // https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2021)001-e.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. The European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). “Study on Individual Access to Constitutional Justice” (2010) // https://www.venice.coe.int/WebForms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLAD(2010)039rev-e.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Ulfstein, Geir. “The European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court?” PluriCourts Research 14 (2014) // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2419459.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Žalimas, Dainius. “Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismo praktikos įtaka Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo jurisprudencijai” (2016) // https://lrkt.lt/data/public/uploads/2017/09/pranesimai_zalimas_2016-m.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
