1. bookVolume 14 (2021): Issue 1 (June 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
05 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Pandemics in Cyberspace – Empire in Search of a Sovereign?

Published Online: 08 Oct 2021
Page range: 103 - 123
Received: 26 Apr 2021
Accepted: 16 Jul 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
05 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Traditionally, the idea of a sovereign is being connected either with an absolutist ruler (later replaced by “the people”) at the national level, or the nation-state at the international level – at least in the conditions of the Westphalian system created in 1648. Today, on the contrary, we are witnessing a “post-” situation in many respects – post-modernism, post-positivism, but also post-statism – basically being a sort of return to the pre-Westphalian system (see Ondrej Hamuľák, “Lessons from the ‘Constitutional Mythology’ or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration,” DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review Vol. 6, No. 2 (2015); or Danuta Kabat-Rudnicka, “Autonomy or Sovereignty: the Case of the European Union,” International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 20, No. 2 (2020)). However, paternalistic views, prevailing especially in times of crisis and uncertainty, desperately search for a sovereign to lead us from the crises. With regard to cyberattacks and insecurity in the cyberspace this means an effort to subordinate cyberspace to state sovereignty. Still, given the limitations of traditional state-based monopolies of power and legislation, the state as an “analogue sovereign” shrinks in the digital cyberspace rather to a co-sovereign, co-ordinator, or in feudal terms a “senior” vis-à-vis their vassals. The actual ensuring of the tasks of state as a “digital sovereign” is namely often being entrusted to non-state (essentially private-owned) entities, under the threat of legal sanctions. The current situation of constructing “digital sovereignty” of traditional states or of the EU is thus marked by the necessity of cooperation between the state power and those non-state entities which are falling under its analogue jurisdiction.

Keywords

1. Andraško, Jozef, Matúš Mesarčík, and Ondrej Hamuľák. “The regulatory intersections between artificial intelligence, data protection and cyber security: challenges and opportunities for the EU legal framework.” AI & Soc Vol. 36 (2021): 623–636 // https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01125-5. Search in Google Scholar

2. Bandemer, Stephan, et al. “Staatsaufgaben – Von der ‘schleichenden’ Privatisierung zum ‘aktivierenden Staat’” (The role of states – from ‘creeping’ privatisation to the ‘activating state’): 41–60. In: Fritz Behrens, ed. Den Staat neu denken. Reformperspektiven für die Landesverwaltung (Rethinking the state. Reform perspectives for the state administration). Berlin: Sigma, 1995. Search in Google Scholar

3. Barlow, John Perry. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace” (May 2021) // https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence. Search in Google Scholar

4. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

5. Davila, Erica M. “International E-Discovery: Navigating the Maze” (May 2021) // https://tlp.law.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/tlp/article/view/37. Search in Google Scholar

6. De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. “Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law.” Journal of Law and Society 14(3) (1987): 279–302. Search in Google Scholar

7. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967. Search in Google Scholar

8. Hamuľák, Ondrej. “Lessons from the ‘Constitutional Mythology’ or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration.” DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review Vol. 6, No. 2 (2015): 75–90 // https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2015-0005. Search in Google Scholar

9. Hamuľák, Ondrej, Lilla N. Kiss, Tomáš Gábriš, and Hovsep Kocharyan. “This Content is not Available in your Country. A General Summary on Geo-Blocking in and Outside the European Union.” International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 21, No. 1 (2021): 153–183 // https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0006. Search in Google Scholar

10. Hart, Herbert L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961. Search in Google Scholar

11. Ipsen, Nils Ch. Private Normenordnungen als Transnationales Recht? (Private Norm Systems as Transnational Law?). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

12. Kabat-Rudnicka, Danuta. “Autonomy or Sovereignty: The Case of the European Union.” International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 20, No. 2 (2020): 73–92 // https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0018. Search in Google Scholar

13. Kadelbach, Stefan, and Klaus Günther. “Recht ohne Staat?” (Law without State): 9–48. In: Stefan Kadelbach and Klaus Günther, eds. Recht ohne Staat? Zur Normativität nichtstaatlicher Rechtssetzung (Law without State? On the Normativity of Non-State Law-making). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

14. Kagermann, Henning, and Ulrich Wilhelm, eds. “European Public Sphere: Towards Digital Sovereignty for Europe.” The acatech IMPULSE series (May 2020) // https://www.acatech.de/publikation/european-public-sphere/download-pdf?lang=en. Search in Google Scholar

15. Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

16. Lee, Myungsuk. “Conceptualizing the New Governance: A New Institution of Social Coordination” (May 2021) // https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/71ec/0b861a6dad2d93b56ab5f8c6b77bfa415a48.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

17. Leenes, Ronald, Bert Jaa Koops, and Paul De Hert. Constitutional Rights and New Technologies: A Comparative Study. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

18. Lessig, Lawrence. Code V.2. New York: Basic Books, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

19. Ohm, Paul. “The Argument Against Technology-Neutral Surveillance Laws.” Texas Law Review 88 (2010): 1685–1714. Search in Google Scholar

20. Polčák, Radim, et al. Právo informačních technologií (IT Law). Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

21. Polčák, Radim. “In Law, we Trust: Shortly to Bumblebees and the Normativity of Law in Cyberspace”: 3–10. In: Radim Polčák, Martin Škop, and David Šmahel, eds. Cyberspace 2005. Brno: Masayrkova Univerzita, 2006 Search in Google Scholar

22. Rogers, Kevin M. The Internet and the Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

23. Roguski, Przemysław. “Layered Sovereignty: Adjusting Traditional Notions of Sovereignty to a Digital Environment”: 1–13. In: Tomáš Minárik et al., eds. 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Silent Battle. Tallinn: NATO CCD COE Publications, 2019 // https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2019/06/Art_19_Layered-Sovereignty.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

24. Romano, Santi. Die Rechtsordnung (The Legal Order). Translated by Werner Daum. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1975. Search in Google Scholar

25. Solomon. Jason M. “New Governance, Preemptive Self-Regulation, and the Blurring of Boundaries in Regulatory Theory and Practice” (May 2021) // https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/680/. Search in Google Scholar

26. Tropina, Tatiana, and Cormac Callanan. Self- and Co-regulation in Cybercrime, Cybersecurity and National Security. Cham: Springer, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

27. Vec, Miloš. “Das selbstgeschaffene Recht der Ingenieure. Internationalisierung und Dezentralisierung am Beginn der Industriegesellschaft” (The self-created right of engineers. Internationalisation and decentralisation at the beginning of industrial society): 96–97. In: European and International Regulation after the Nation State. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

28. Wright, Aaron, and Primavera De Filippi. “Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia” (May 2021) // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2580664. Search in Google Scholar

29. Yen, Alfred C. Western Frontier or Feudal Society? Metaphors and Perceptions of Cyberspace.” Berkeley Law Journal 17 (2002): 1207–1264. Search in Google Scholar

30. Završnik, Aleš. “Cybercrime: (Cyber)Criminological and (Cyber)Victimological Particularities of the ‘Information Superhighway’”: 157–174. In: Radim Polčák, Martin Škop, and David Šmahel, eds. Cyberspace 2005. Brno: Masayrkova Univerzita, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

31. Zippelius, Reinhold. Verhaltenssteuerung durch Recht und kulturelle Leitideen. (Behavioural control through law and cultural guiding ideas). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo