[1. Carbonell, Miguel, and Leonardo García. El canon neoconstitucional (The neoconstitutional canon). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Clayton, Matthew. “Liberal Equality and Ethics.” Ethics 113 (2002): 8-22 // DOI: 10.1086/341324.10.1086/341324]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Dworkin, Ronald. “¿Deben nuestros jueces ser filósofos? ¿Pueden ser filósofos?” (Should our judges be philosophers? Could they be philosophers?). Estudios de Derecho 144 (2007): 16-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Forum of Principles.” New York University Law Review (1981): 469-518.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Dworkin, Ronald. Ética privada e igualitarismo político (Private ethics and political egalitarianism). Barcelona: Paidós, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Dworkin, Ronald. “Foundations of Liberal Equality”: 190-306. In: S. Darwall, ed. Equal Freedom: Selected Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom’s Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2011.10.2307/j.ctvjf9vkt]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Dworkin, Ronald. La comunidad liberal. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Dworkin, Ronald. La democracia posible (Is Democracy Possible Here?). Barcelona: Paidós, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Dworkin, Ronald. “Liberal Community.” California Law Review 77 (1989): 479-594.10.2307/3480555]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Dworkin, Ronald. Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Vintage Books, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Dworkin, Ronald. “Naturaleza contra autocreación” (Nature against autocreation), El País (March 16, 1997) // http://elpais.com/diario/1997/03/17/sociedad/858553210_850215.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Dworkin, Ronald. Religion without God. Cambridge-London: Harvard University Press, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Dworkin, Ronald. Una cuestión de principios (An Matter of Principles). Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Fleming, James, and Linda McClain. “Dworkin’s Perfectionism.” Boston University School of Law, (2015): 1-22.10.2139/ssrn.2683454]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Garzón Vallejo, Iván. “Dworkin and Religious Beliefs as a Right to Ethical Independence.” Telos 183 (2018): 253-255 // DOI: 10.3817/0618183253.10.3817/0618183253]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Garzón Vallejo, Iván. La religión en la razón pública (Religion in public reason). Buenos Aires-Bogotá: Editorial Astrea-Universidad de La Sabana, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. George, Robert. Making Men Moral. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Guest, Stephen. Ronald Dworkin. California: Stanford University Press, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Interview with Aquiles Arrieta, Law Clerk of The Constitutional Court of Colombia, in Bogotá, Colombia (May 10, 2018). Interview by Iván Garzón Vallejo, Associate Professor, Universidad de La Sabana.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Interview with Andrés Ollero, Justice in the Constitutional Court of Spain, in Madrid, Spain (December 7, 2015). Interview by Iván Garzón Vallejo, Associate Professor, Universidad de La Sabana.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Interview with Carlos Bernal Pulido, Justice in the Constitutional Court of Colombia, by e-mail (May 24, 2018). Interview by Iván Garzón Vallejo, Associate Professor, Universidad de La Sabana.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Interview with Claudia Escobar, Law Clerk of The Constitutional Court of Colombia, by e-mail (May 31, 2018). Interview by Iván Garzón Vallejo, Associate Professor, Universidad de La Sabana.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Interview with Cristina Pardo, Justice in the Constitutional Court of Colombia, in Bogotá, Colombia (May 10, 2018). Interview by Iván Garzón Vallejo, Associate Professor, Universidad de La Sabana.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Interview with José Antonio Cepeda, Law Clerk in the Constitutional Court of Colombia, in Bogotá, Colombia (May 10, 2018). Interview by Iván Garzón Vallejo, Associate Professor, Universidad de La Sabana.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Koppelman, Andrew. “Ronald Dworkin, Religion and Neutrality.” Boston University Law Review 94 (2014): 1241-1253.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. López, Diego. “Kelsen, Hart y Dworkin en Hispanoamérica: condiciones de posibilidad de una filosofía local del Derecho”: 415-457. En “Problemas Contemporáneos de la Filosofía del Derecho” (Kelsen, Hart and Dworkin in Hispanic America: conditions of the possibility of a local philosophy of Law. From Contemporary Problems of Law Philosophy). Mexico. UNAM, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Lund, William. “Politics, Citizens and the Good Life: Assessing Two Versions of Ethical Liberalism.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (1996): 479-504 // DOI: 10.1177/106591299604900302.10.1177/106591299604900302]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Macleod, Colin. “Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance?” Law and Philosophy 16 (1997): 529-559 //DOI: 10.2307/3505019.10.2307/3505019]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Neal, Patrick. “Liberalism and Neutrality.” Polity 17 (1985): 664-684 // DOI: 10.2307/3234569.10.2307/3234569]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Rodríguez, César. La decisión judicial (The judicial decision). Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Sauca, José M. El Legado de Dworkin a la filosofía del Derecho. Tomando en serio el imperio del erizo (Dworkin’s legacy in philosophical law. Taking seriously hedgehogs’ imperialism). Madrid. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Sherwin, Emily. “How liberal is liberal equality? A comment on Ronald Dworkin’s Tanner Lecture.” Legal Theory (1995): 227-250.10.1017/S135232520000015X]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Shiffrin, Steven. “Liberalism, Radicalism and Legal Scholarship.” UCLA Law Review 30 (1983): 1103-1217.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Walzer, Michael. Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Williams, Bernard. “Dworkin on Community and Critical Interest.” California Law Review 77 (1989): 515-520.10.2307/3480557]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 1994, no. C-133.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 1994, no. C-350.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 1994, no. T-401.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 1996, no. C-045.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 1996, no. T-669.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 1997, no. C-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 1997, no. C-239.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 1998, no. C-404.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2001, no. C-1287.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2005, no. C-1041.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2006, no. C-355.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2011, no. C-817.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2012, no. C-241.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2013, no. T-773.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2014, no. T-314.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2016, no. SU-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2017, no. C-174.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2017, no. T-361.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2018, no. C-009.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2018, no. SU-023.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Constitutional Court of Colombia, 2018, no. T-468.]Search in Google Scholar
