[1. Boratyńska, Katarzyna, Łukasz Chojniak, and Wojciech Jasiński. Postępowanie karne [Criminal procedure]. Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Cieślak, Marian. Dzieła wybrane. Tom II. Polska procedura karna. Podstawowe założenia teoretyczne [Selected Works. Volume II. Polish criminal procedure. The basic theoretical assumptions]. Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Corrado, Michael Louis. “The Future of Adversarial Systems: An Introduction to the Papers from the First Conference.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 35 (2010): 285-296.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Engel, Christoph. “Preponderance of the evidence versus intime conviction: a behavioral perspective on a conflict between American and Continental European law.” Vermont Law Review 33(3) (2009): 435-468.10.2139/ssrn.1401442]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Feldmeier, John, and Frank Schmalleger. Criminal Law and Procedure for Legal Professionals. New York: Practice Hall, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Goodpaster, Gary. “On the theory of American adversary criminal trial.” The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 78 (1987): 118-154.10.2307/1143577]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Grzegorczyk, Tomasz, and Janusz Tylman. Polskie postępowanie karne wyd. 8 [Polish criminal proceedings, 8 ed.]. Warsaw: LexisNexis, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Israel, Jerold, Wayne LaFave, Nancy King, and Orin Kerr. Criminal Procedure. 5th ed. Las Vegas: West Law School, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Katz, Lewis R., and Neil P. Cohen. Questions & Answers: Criminal Procedure I & II. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Kuckes Niki. “Civil Due Process, Criminal Due Process.” Yale Law & Policy Review 25 (2006): 1-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Lach, Arkadiusz. “Zasada kontradyktoryjności w postępowaniu sądowym w procesie karnym de lege lata i de lege ferenda” [“The principle of adversarial trial in a criminal proces de lege lata and de lege ferenda”]. Palestra 5-6 (2012): 124-138.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Nita, Barbara, and Światłowski Andrzej. “Kontradyktoryjny proces karny (między prawdą materialną a szybkością postępowania)” [“Adversarial criminal litigation (between the material truth and velocity of proceedings”]. Państwo i Prawo 1 (2012): 33-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Pawelec, Szymon. “Od wniosku o skazanie bez rozprawy do negocjowania wyroków. Czy zmierzamy w stronę plea bargaining?” [“From a motion to convict the accused without conducting a trial to negotiating a sentence. Are we aiming toward plea bargaining?”]: 218-226. In: Cezary Kulesza, ed. Ocena funkcjonowania porozumień procesowych w praktyce wymiaru sprawiedliwości [The assessment of plea agreements in practice of criminal justice]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Senna, Joseph, and Larry Siegel. Introduction to Criminal Justice. 8th ed. Las Vegas: Cengage Learning, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Stefanowicz, Krzysztof. “The victim of the crime in Polish criminal law.” Capital University Law Review 21 (1992): 86-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Śliwiński, Stanisław. Polski proces karny przed sądem powszechnym. Zasady ogólne. Wydanie II [Polish criminal process before the court. General principles. Edition II]. Warsaw: Lawyers Publishing House, 1961.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Świda, Zofia, ed. Postępowanie karne. Cześć ogólna [The criminal proceedings. General part.]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. The National Centre for Victims of Crime. “Civil Justice for Victims of Crime.” (2008) // http://victimsofcrime.org/docs/NCVBA/standard-cj-brofinal.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed November 21, 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Tokarczyk, Roman. Prawo amerykańskie [American Law]. Warsaw: Oficyna, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Walpin, Gerald. “America’s adversarial and jury systems: more likely to do justice.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 26 (2003): 175-186.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Waltoś, Stanisław, and Piotr Hofmański. Proces karny. Zarys systemu [Criminal process. Outline of the systems]. Warsaw: LexisNexis, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Zacharias, Fred C. “Who owns work product?” University of Illinois Law Review 1 (2006): 127-176. ]Search in Google Scholar
