[
Atun, R.; Harvey, I. & Wild, J. (2007), ‘Innovation, Patents and Economic Growth,’ International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919607001758
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benassi, M. & Martin-Sanchez, M. (2022), ‘Patent Intermediaries, “New” Actors in the Intellectual Property Market,’ Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10310-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ćemalović, U. (2021), ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Digital Transformation in Estonia: Aspects Related to Copyright and Patent Protection,’ Strani Pravni Zivot, no. 4, pp. 701–713. https://doi.org/10.5937/spz65-34681
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Desaunettes-Barbero, L.; de Visscher, F.; Strowel, A. & Cassiers, V. (2023), The Unitary Patent Package & Unified Patent Court: Problems, Possible Improvements and Alternatives, Milano: Ledizioni.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dragos, D. C. & Racolţa, B. (2017), ‘Comparing Legal Instruments for R&D&I: State Aid and Public Procurement,’ European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 408–421. https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2017/4/7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutt, P.; Ferraro, S.; Chochia, A. & Muljar, R. (2018), ‘Using Patent Development, Education Policy and Research and Development Expenditure Policy to Understand Differences between Countries: The Case of Estonia and Finland,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 123–153. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2018-0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutt, P. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2021), ‘The Legal Implications of Public Support Policies Targeting Research, Development and Innovation in the European Union,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 102–129. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutt, P. K.; Wahl, M. & Kerikmäe, T. (2019), ‘Using Patent Development, Education Policy and Research and Development Expenditure Policy to Understand Differences Between Countries—The Case of Estonia and Germany,’ International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 190–233. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EPO (2016), Measuring the Economic Impact of IP: Annual Report 2016, European Patent Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EPO (2022), Unitary Patent Guide: Obtaining, Maintaining and Managing Unitary Patents, 2nd ed., European Patent Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EPO & EUIPO (2021), Intellectual Property Rights and Firm Performance in the European Union: Firm-Level Analysis Report (February 2021), European Patent Office & European Union Intellectual Property Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (2021), Estonian Research and Development, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Strategy 2021–2035, 15.7.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estonian Patents Act, RT I 1994, 25, 406, 16.3.1994.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2019), Peer Review of the Estonian R&I System, Final Report, Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility, Brussels. https://doi.org/10.2777/030204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Patent Convention, Convention on the Grant of European Patents, Munich, 5.10.1973.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galiakhmetov, R.; Giuri, P. & Munari, F. (2018), ‘How to Enhance Patent Commercialisation? An Analysis of Patent Aggregators in Europe,’ International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 22, no. 4, art. 1850040. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500408
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghafele, R. & Gibert, B. (2014), ‘IP Commercialization Tactics in Developing Country Contexts,’ Journal of Management and Strategy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v5n2p1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenhalgh, C. & Rogers, M. (2010), Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400832231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harrer, R. & Lackner, M. (2014), ‘Integrated Marketing Communications in the Commercialisation of Intellectual Property,’ International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, vol. 7, nos. 1/2, pp. 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2014.062793
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasanov, O. (2022), ‘Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence,’ Economics & Law, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 37–55. https://doi.org/10.37708/el.swu.v4i2.4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hearn, G.; Cunningham, S. & Ordonez, D. (2004), ‘Commercialisation of Knowledge in Universities: The Case of Creative Industries,’ Prometheus, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0810902042000218364
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jürgen, L. (2018) ‘Intellectual Property in Business: How to Increase Company Value Through Careful Strategic Planning?’ Njord Law Firm, 30 August. Retrieved from https://www.njordlaw.com/njord-estonia-intellectual-property-business-how-increase-company-value-through-careful-strategic [accessed 20 Aug 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelli, A. (2015), ‘The Conceptual Bases for Codifying Estonia’s IP Law and the Main Legislative Changes: From the Comparative Approach to Embedding Drafted Law into the Socio-Economic Context,’ International Comparative Jurisprudence, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelli, A.; Värv, A.; Mets, T.; Mantrov, V.; Birštonas, R. & Ginter, C. (2016), ‘Different Regulatory Models of Transfer of Industrial Property Rights in the Baltic States: A Plea for Harmonized Approach,’ International Comparative Jurisprudence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2016.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kieff, F. S. & Paredes, T. (2015), Perspectives on Commercializing Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, J. & Lee, S. (2015), ‘Patent Databases for Innovation Studies: A Comparative Analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO, and KIPO,’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 92, pp. 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lichtenthaler, U. (2010), ‘Intellectual Property and Open Innovation: An Empirical Analysis,’ International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 52, nos. 3/4, pp. 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.035981
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nyman-Metcalf, K.; Dutt, P. K. & Chochia, A. (2014), ‘The Freedom to Conduct Business and the Right to Property: The EU Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation and the Relationship Between Intellectual Property and Competition Law,’ in T. Kerikmäe (ed.) Protecting Human Rights in the EU: Controversies and Challenges of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38902-3_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Othman, A. (2011), Intellectual Property Commercialization in the EU: Policy Options and Practical Instruments. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/37177994/Intellectual_Property_Commercialization_in_the_EU_Policy_Options_and_Practical_Instruments [accessed Feb 2024]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patent Cooperation Treaty, PCT, 19.6.1970.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patent Law of Georgia LHG, 5(12), 24. 2.1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peredy, Z. & Laki, B. (2020), ‘Possible Ways of IP Commercialisation in the European Higher Education Ecosystem,’ International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 56–74. https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2020.3.7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pitta, L. A. (1992), ‘Intellectual Property Laws in the Former Soviet Republics: A Time of Transition,’ Santa Clara High Tech. L.J., vol. 8, p. 499.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plomer, A. (2020), ‘The Unified Patent Court and the Transformation of the European Patent System,’ IIC—International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 51, pp. 791–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00963-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Principles for the Acquisition, Encumbrance with Limited Real Right and Transfer of Assets Regulation No 4 of 30 October 2015 of the Board of Governors of Tallinn University of Technology Amended by Regulation No 2 of 8 November 2019 of the Council of Tallinn University of Technology (entry into force 25.11.2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Resolution of the Parliament of Georgia concerning the Harmonization of Georgian Legislation to the EU Legislation, 828–IS, 2.9.1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ricketson, S. (1996), ‘Universities and Their Exploitation of Intellectual Property,’ Bond Law Review, vol. 8, no. 1, art. 2. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.5278
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sakpatenti (2023), ‘European Patents will be Recognized in Georgia,’ 17 May. Retrieved from https://www.sakpatenti.gov.ge/en/news_and_events/519/ [accessed 15 Jul 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sweet, C. & Eterovic, D. (2015), ‘Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase Innovation?’ World Development, vol. 66, pp. 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taliashvili, T. (1998), ‘Some Aspects of Patent Law,’ Journal of Law, vols. 5–6, pp. 37–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taliashvili, T. & Shamatava, I. (2020), ‘Recent Evolution of Intellectual Property Enforcement in Georgia,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tallinn University of Technology (2021), Explanatory Note to the Key Indicators of the Strategic Plan 2021–2025 of Tallinn University of Technology. Retrieved from https://oigusaktid.taltech.ee/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/EN_Seletuskiriu%CC%88likooli-arengukava-2021_2025-vo%CC%83tmena%CC%88itajatest.docx.pdf [accessed Feb 2024]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UN (2011), Intellectual Property Commercialization: Policy Options and Practical Instruments, New York and Geneva: United Nations Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United States Code, Title 35 – Patents. (35 U.S.C., amended up to Public Law No. 117-328), United States of America.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Validation Agreement between Georgia and the European Patent Organisation, CA/23/19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Veugelers, R. & Harhoff, D. (2023), ‘New Options for Patenting in Europe,’ Science vol. 381, no. 6654, p. 111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj6400
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilkof, N. (2014), ‘Theories of Intellectual Property: Is it Worth the Effort?’ Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 257. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpu018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WIPO (2022), ‘Establishment of the Baltic Technology Transfer Offices Network,’ 29 March. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/technology-transfer/en/news/2022/news_0005.html [accessed 25 Aug 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xenos, D. (2020), ‘The Impact of the European Patent System on SMEs and National States,’ Prometheus, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 51–68. https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.36.1.0051
]Search in Google Scholar
