[
Aksin, O. Z. & Masini, A. (2008), ‘Effective Strategies for Internal Outsourcing and Offshoring of Business Services: An Empirical Investigation,’ Journal of Operations Management, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.02.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bekenova, Z.; Müürsepp, P.; Nurysheva, G. & Turarbekova, L. (2022), ‘Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 79–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bywater Consulting (2001), ‘Realising the Potential of Shared Services: Internal Outsourcing,’ Research Briefings, Stamford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cetean-Voiculescu, L. (2016), ‘Extra Judicial Divorce Procedure,’ Annales Universitatis Apulensis, Series Jurisprudentia, vol. 19, pp. 19–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chamber of Notaries (2017a), ‘Teisingumo ministerijos atstovams pristatyta sistema eNotaras’ [eNotaras system presented to representatives of the Ministry of Justice], Notarų rūmai, June 6. Retrieved from https://notarurumai.lt/naujienos/teisingumo-ministerijos-atstovams-pristatyta-sistema-enotaras/186 [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chamber of Notaries (2017b), ‘Turto perleidimo sistema per Notaro „vieną langelį“ – tarp pažangiausių pasaulyje, rodo tyrimas’ [The system of transferring assets through a notary’s “one-stop shop”—among the most advanced in the world, the study shows], Notarų rūmai, November 6. Retrieved from https://notarurumai.lt/naujienos/turto-perleidimo-sistema-per-notaro-viena-langelitarp-pazangiausiu-pasaulyje-rodo-tyrimas/202 [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania, no. VIII-1864, 18.7.2000, Vilnius. Last amended on 12.4.2011, no. XI-1312. Retrieved from https://eseimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalActPrint/lt?jfwid=32ocqrv7x&documentId=TAIS.400592&category=TAD [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, 4.11.1950.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European e-Justice (n.d.), ‘Divorce and Legal Separation.” Retrieved from https://e-justice.europa.eu/45/EN/divorce_and_legal_separation?LATVIA&init=true&member=1 [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerber, R. J. (1990), ‘Recommendation of Domestic Relations Reform,’ Arizona Law Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 9–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guga, O. V. N. (2015), ‘Comparative Study between the Divorce, by Mutual Consent of Spouses, on Administrative Way and the Same Type of Divorce on Judicial Way,’ Revista Academiei Forţelor Terestre, no. 2(78), pp. 177–182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heriyanti, F.; Agustina, Y. & Pakpahan, E. F. (2020), ‘Readiness and Role of Notaries in Making Electronic Deeds towards the Industrial Revolution,’ In Proceedings of the International Conference on Culture Heritage, Education, Sustainable Tourism, and Innovation Technologies, Cesit 2020, pp. 105–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ionaş, D.-G. (2017), ‘Admissibility Conditions for Divorce by Notary Procedure,’ Law Review, pp. 162–169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kraljić, S. (2020), ‘New Family Code and the Dejudicialization of Divorce in Slovenia,’ Balkan Social Science Review, vol. 15, pp. 158–177. https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr20150158k
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos teismai (n.d.), [Lithuanian courts]. Retrieved from https://teismai.lt [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mikelėnas, V. et al. (2022), Commentary on the Civil Code. Third Book. Family Law, Vilnius: Justitia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitrović, S. T. (2019), ‘Divorce by Mutual Agreement and Notary,’ Pravo—Teorija I Praksa, vol. 36, nos. 7–9, pp. 56–66. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp1907056M
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nicu, C. G. (2016), ‘Procedures for Dissolution of Marriage—Harmonization with European Legislation,’ Universul Juridic, pp. 178–183
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Preston, S. H. (1975), ‘Estimating the Proportion of American Marriages That End in Divorce,’ Sociological Methods and Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 435–460.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rigby, K. J. (1984), ‘Symposium: Alternate Dispute Resolution,’ Louisiana Law Review, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1725–1752.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruggeri, L. & Giobbi, M. (2021), ‘Regímenes patrimoniales y registros de la propiedad de las parejas transfronterizas,’ Revista Internacional de Doctrina y Jurisprudencia, no. 25, pp. 229–249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruggeri, L.; Kunda, I. & Winkler, S., eds. (2019), Family Property and Succession in EU Member States: National Reports on the Collected Data, Sveučilište u Rijeci: Pravni fakultet.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruggeri, L.; Limantė, A. & Vogrinc, N. P. (2022), The EU Regulations on Matrimonial Property and Property of Registered Partnerships, Cambridge, Antwerp & Chicago: Intersentia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saccuzzo, D. P. (2003), ‘Controversies in Divorce Mediation,’ North Dakota Law Review, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 425–438.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šekštelo, A. (2018), ‘Solidariųjų bendraskolių tarpusavio atgręžtiniai reikalavimai’ [Mutual recourse claims of joint and several co-debtors], Teisės Problemos [Legal problems], no. 2(96), pp. 44–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2006a), Civil Case no. 3K-3-350/2006, O.M. vs. R.M.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2006b), Civil Case no. 3K-3-474/2006, B.M. vs. A.M.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2008), Civil Case no. 3K-3-243/2008, Mr. E.G. R.G.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2013), Civil Case no. 3K-3-567/2013, E. S. vs. G.S.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2022), Civil Case no. e3K-3-5-916/2022, E.M. vs. A. M.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Supreme Court of Lithuania (2008), Review of Practice on Actio Pauliana, Indirect Action, Right of Arrest and Application of Preventive Action Institutes, no. A-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trinkūnienė, E.; Trinkūnas, V. & Bublienė, R. (2022), ‘Mediation Like the Opportunity in Bailiffs’ Work,’ Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science (JLISS), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Troitiño, D. (2022), ‘The European Union Facing the 21st Century: The Digital Revolution,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 60–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tvaronavičienė, A. (2022), ‘Changes in Divorce by Mutual Consent of the Spouses. Will It Be Faster and Easier to Get a Divorce at a Notary?’ INFOLEX. Retrieved from https://www.infolex.lt/portal/start.asp?act=news&Tema=54&str=106719# [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNIDROIT (2016), UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. Retrieved from https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2016-English-bl.pdf [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, S. E. (2015), ‘Are Notaries an Endangered Species?’ Retrieved from https://williamsassociates-ltd.com/articles/Are_Notaries_an_Endangered_Species_by_Steven_E_Williams.pdf [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, O. (1985), ‘Contractual Man,’ in The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press, pp. 43–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Your Europe (2022), ‘Divorce and Legal Separation.” Retrieved from https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/family/couple/divorce-separation/index_en.htm [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
]Search in Google Scholar
