1. bookVolume 12 (2022): Issue 1 (May 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality

Published Online: 23 Jun 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 12 (2022) - Issue 1 (May 2022)
Page range: 79 - 98
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The problem of value alignment in the context of AI studies is becoming more and more acute. This article deals with the basic questions concerning the system of human values corresponding to what we would like digital minds to be capable of. It has been suggested that as long as humans cannot agree on a universal system of values in the positive sense, we might be able to agree on what has to be avoided. The article argues that while we may follow this suggestion, we still need to keep the positive approach in focus as well. A holistic solution to the value alignment problem is not in sight and there might possibly never be a final solution. Currently, we are facing an era of endless adjustment of digital minds to biological ones. The biggest challenge is to keep humans in control of this adjustment. Here the responsibility lies with the humans. Human minds might not be able to fix the capacity of digital minds. The philosophical analysis shows that the key concept when dealing with this issue is value plurality. It may well be that we have to redefine our understanding of rationality in order to successfully deal with the value alignment problem. The article discusses an option to elaborate on the traditional understanding of rationality in the context of AI studies.

Keywords

Arnold, T.; Kasenberg, D. & Scheutz, M. (2017), ‘Value alignment or misalignment—what will keep systems accountable?’ The AAAI -17 Workshop on AI, Ethics, and Society, WS-17-02. Retrieved from https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW17/paper/view/15216/14648 [accessed Dec 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Berlin, I. (2013[1947]), ‘The pursuit of the ideal,’ in H. Hardy (ed.) The Crooked Timber of Humanity, Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. (2003), ‘Are you living in a computer simulation?’ Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 211, pp. 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00309 Search in Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. (2019), ‘The vulnerable world hypothesis,’ Global Policy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12718 Search in Google Scholar

Bryson, J. (2018), ‘Patiency is not a virtue: The design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics,’ Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6 Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. (2010), ‘The singularity: A philosophical analysis,’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 17, nos. 9–10, pp. 7–65. Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2019a), A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Disciplines. Retrieved from https://www.aepd.es/media/docs/ai-definition.pdf [accessed Sep 2021] Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2019b), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation [accessed Dec 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Fisac, J. F.; Gates, M. A.; Hamrick, J. B.; Liu, C.; Hadfield-Menell, D.; Palaniappan, M.; Malik, D.; Sastry S. S.; Griffiths, T. L. & Dragan, A. D. (2018), ‘Pragmatic-pedagogic value alignment,’ in N. Amato, N. G. Hager, S. Thomas & M. Torres-Torriti (eds.) Robotics Research: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics 10, Cham: Springer, pp. 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28619-4_7 Search in Google Scholar

Gabriel, I. (2020), ‘Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment,’ Minds and Machines, vol. 30, pp. 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2 Search in Google Scholar

IBM (2019), ‘Everyday ethics for artificial intelligence’, IBM Corp. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/watson/assets/duo/pdf/everydayethics.pdf [accessed Sep 2021] Search in Google Scholar

IEEE (2019), Ethically Aligned Design. A Vision for Prioritizing Human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Incorporated. Retrieved from https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/ead1e.pdf [accessed Dec 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Joamets, K. & Chochia, A. (2021), ‘Access to artificial intelligence for persons with disabilities: Legal and ethical questions concerning the application of trustworthy AI,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51−66. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2021.1.04 Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, S. (2019), How to Count Animals, More or Less, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198829676.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T.; Müürsepp, P.; Pihl, H. M.; Hamuľák, O. & Kocharyan, H. (2020), ‘Legal person- or agenthood of artificial intelligence technologies,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 73–92. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.2.05 Search in Google Scholar

Kesa, A. & Kerikmäe, T. (2020), ‘Artificial intelligence and the GDPR: Inevitable nemeses?’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 68−90. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0022 Search in Google Scholar

Maxwell, N. (2021), The World Crisis – And What to do About It. A Revolution for Thought and Action, New Jersey, London, etc.: World Scientific. Search in Google Scholar

Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Kerikmäe, T. (2021), ‘Machines are taking over—are we ready? Law and Artificial Intelligence,’ Singapore Academy of Law Journal, vol. 33, pp. 24−49. Search in Google Scholar

Russell, S. (2019), Human Compatible AI and the Problem of Control, London: Penguin Books. Search in Google Scholar

Russell, S.; Dewey, D. & Tegmark, M. (2016), ‘Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence,’ AI Magazine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577 Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1980), ‘Minds, brains, and programs,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756 Search in Google Scholar

Shulman, C. & Bostrom, N. (2021), ‘Sharing the world with digital minds,’ in S. Clarke, H. Zohny & J. Savulescu (eds.) Rethinking Moral Status, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894076.003.0018 Search in Google Scholar

Soares, N. (2015), The Value Learning Problem, Technical Report, Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Search in Google Scholar

Soares, N. & Fallenstein, B. (2014), Aligning Superintelligence with Human Interests: A Technical Research Agenda, Technical Report, Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Search in Google Scholar

Sutrop, M. (2020), ‘Challenges of aligning artificial intelligence with human values,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 54–72. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.2.04 Search in Google Scholar

Zamyatin, Y. (1993), We, London: Penguin Classics. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo