1. bookVolume 11 (2021): Issue 2 (September 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Legal Implications of Public Support Policies Targeting Research, Development and Innovation in the European Union

Published Online: 15 Nov 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 11 (2021) - Issue 2 (September 2021)
Page range: 102 - 129
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The research problem of this article focuses on how the public support system in Estonia can help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to acquire and commercialise their intellectual property rights (IPR) in a sustainable and legally permissible manner. The study aims to analyse and determine which specific public support measures are needed by SMEs for acquiring and commercialising IPR and how to design such public support within the legal boundaries set under European Union (EU) laws. The theoretical framework used in this study is built around the social system as defined by Parsons. The 4S Model (based on scope, scale, skill and social networking) derived by researchers from the said social system is considered. Further, 19 key attributes were devised by the authors in conjunction with the role of motivation to form a revised framework. The analysis employs qualitative research methods. To apply the framework of social systems theory, the authors used semi-structured interviews as a method to study the public support measures required by Estonian stakeholders. This was also analysed in the framework of EU State aid law, which poses both restrictions and exemptions. This research presents several desired support measures. Although the public support systems for acquiring and commercialising IPR by SMEs are restrained by legal frameworks within the EU, the analysis of the relevant laws and cases shows that State aid for RDI purposes is legally permissible within the EU, depending on the state’s willingness and availability of funds.

Keywords

Aghion, P. & Tirole, J. (1994), ‘The management of innovation,’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1185–1209. https://doi.org/10.2307/211836010.2307/2118360 Search in Google Scholar

Andrijevskaja, J.; Varblane, U. & Mets, T. (2010), ‘Knowledge-based entrepreneurship in Estonia,’ CASE Network Studies and Analyses, No. 407. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.167013810.2139/ssrn.1670138 Search in Google Scholar

Atlanta Fruchthandelsgesellschaft mbH and others v. Bundesamt für Ernährung und Forstwirtschaft [1991], ECJ, C-465/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:369, 9.11.1995. Search in Google Scholar

Basberg, B. (1987), ‘Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature,’ Research Policy, vol. 16, nos. 2–4, pp. 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90027-810.1016/0048-7333(87)90027-8 Search in Google Scholar

Ben-Menahem, S. M.; von Krogh, G.; Erden, Z. & Schneider, A. (2016), ‘Coordinating knowledge creation in multidisciplinary teams: Evidence from early-stage drug discovery,’ Academy of Management Journal, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.121410.5465/amj.2013.1214 Search in Google Scholar

Blind, K.; Edler, J.; Frietsch, R. & Schmoch, U. (2006), ‘Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany,’ Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.00210.1016/j.respol.2006.03.002 Search in Google Scholar

Cambridge Dictionary (n.d.), ‘Lead time’. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/lead-time [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

Catalán, M.; Clayton, M. & Nowak, A. (2019), ‘Third party rights and the State aid procedures revisited by the European courts: An ever-sounder State aid control,’ Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpz03310.1093/jeclap/lpz033 Search in Google Scholar

Commission Regulation (EU) No. 651/2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty Text with EEA relevance, OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, pp. 1–78. Search in Google Scholar

Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/972 amending Regulation (EU) no. 1407/2013 as regards its prolongation and amending Regulation (EU) no. 651/2014 as regards its prolongation and relevant adjustments, C/2020/4349, OJ L 215, 7.7.2020, pp. 3–6. Search in Google Scholar

Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, pp. 9–29. Search in Google Scholar

Czarnitzki, D.; Ebersberger, B. & Fier, A. (2007), ‘The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany,’ Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1347–1366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.99210.1002/jae.992 Search in Google Scholar

Davis, M. H.; Hall, J. A. & Mayer, P. S. (2016), ‘Developing a new measure of entrepreneurial mindset: Reliability, validity, and implications for practitioners,’ Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb000004510.1037/cpb0000045 Search in Google Scholar

Decision SA.45185 (2017/N) – Germany – Repayable advances for the research and development programme of the Airbus X6 helicopter. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/269260/269260_1958220_81_2.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

Decision SA.49781 (2019/EV) – Italy Evaluation plan for large R&D&I aid scheme under the Fund for Sustainable Growth. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases1/20217/279093_2245543_138_2.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

Decision SA.56245 (2020/EV) – Germany Evaluation plan for the block-exempted R&D tax incentive scheme “Forschungszulagengesetz” for a detailed overview of the evaluation process. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases1/20216/284301_2242214_192_2.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

Dragos, D. C. & Racolţa, B. (2017), ‘Comparing legal instruments for R&D&I: State aid and public procurement,’ European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 408–421. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.314344710.2139/ssrn.3143447 Search in Google Scholar

Dutt, P. K.; Ferraro, S.; Chochia, A. & Muljar, R. (2018), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to understand differences between countries: The case of Estonia and Finland,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 8, no. 1(24), pp. 123–153. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2018-000810.1515/bjes-2018-0008 Search in Google Scholar

Dutt, P. K.; Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Kerikmäe, T. (2021), ‘A review of different theoretical approaches towards sustainable development goals in the area of research, development and innovation,’ Retfærd, vol. 4, no. 167, pp. 89−109. Search in Google Scholar

Dutt, P. K.; Wahl, M. & Kerikmäe, T. (2019), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to understand differences between countries: The case of Estonia and Germany,’ International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 190−233. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-000710.2478/iclr-2019-0007 Search in Google Scholar

Eesti Pagar AS v. Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus [2019], ECJ, C-349/17 ECLI:EU:C:2019:172, 5.3.2019. Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (n.d.), Definition of State Aid. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/overview/index_en.html [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2010), Europe 2020 Strategy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2015a), Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Economic Appraisal Tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020, DG for Regional and Urban Policy, Brussels. Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2015b), State aid support schemes for RDI in the EU’s international competitors in the fields of Science, Research and Innovation, edited by Bird & Bird Brussels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/full_einri_final_study_report.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2018), Code of Best Practices for the conduct of State aid control procedures, C(2018) 4412. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/reform/best_practise/en.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2019a), Study on the Enforcement of State Aid Rules and Decisions by National Courts. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0219428enn.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2019b), Towards A Sustainable Europe by 2030. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/towards-sustainable-europe-2030_en [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2020), Fitness Check Report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/fitness_check_-_main_report_-part1_en.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021] Search in Google Scholar

Ferraro, S.; Dutt, P. K. & Kerikmäe, T. (2017), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technological competitiveness of small European Union Member States,’ Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 23, no. 78, pp. 97−126. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-000910.1515/cirr-2017-0009 Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, J.; Fernandes, C.; Alves, H. & Raposo, M. (2015), ‘Drivers of innovation strategies: Testing the Tidd and Bessant (2009) model,’ Journal of Business Research, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.02110.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.021 Search in Google Scholar

Ferri, D. (2020), ‘The role of EU State aid law as a “risk management tool” in the COVID-19 crisis,’ European Journal of Risk Regulation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.7110.1017/err.2020.71 Search in Google Scholar

Framework for State Aid for Research and Development and Innovation, OJ C 198, 27.6.2014, pp. 1–29. Search in Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J. (1999), ‘The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete,’ 74 New York University Law Review, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 575–629. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.12450810.2139/ssrn.124508 Search in Google Scholar

Griliches, Z. (1958), ‘Research costs and social returns: Hybrid corn and related innovations,’ Journal of Political Economy, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1086/25807710.1086/258077 Search in Google Scholar

Griliches, Z. (1979), ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth,’ The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 92–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/300332110.2307/3003321 Search in Google Scholar

Groen, A. J. (2005), ‘Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship in networks: Towards a multi-level/multi-dimensional approach,’ Journal of Enterprising Culture, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021849580500006910.1142/S0218495805000069 Search in Google Scholar

Groen, A. J.; De Weerd-Nederhof, P. C.; Kerssens-van Drongelen, I. C.; Badoux, R. A. J. & Olthuis, G. P. (2002), ‘Creating and justifying research and development value: Scope, scale, skill and social networking of R&D,’ Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.0023210.1111/1467-8691.00232 Search in Google Scholar

Groen, A. J.; Wakkee, I. & De Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2008), ‘Managing tensions in a high-tech start-up: An innovation journey in social system perspective,’ International Small Business Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/026624260708465910.1177/0266242607084659 Search in Google Scholar

Grossman, S. & Hart, O. (1986), ‘The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration,’ Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1086/26140410.1086/261404 Search in Google Scholar

Hellmann, T. (2007), ‘When do employees become entrepreneurs?’ Management Science, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.064810.1287/mnsc.1060.0648 Search in Google Scholar

Holmstrom, B. (1982), ‘Moral hazard in teams,’ The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 324–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/300345710.2307/3003457 Search in Google Scholar

Kattel, R. & Stamenov, B. (2018), Research and Innovation Observation Country Report 2017: Estonia, EUR 29153 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Search in Google Scholar

Kelli, A.; Värv, A.; Mets, T.; Mantrov, V.; Birštonas, R. & Ginter, C. (2016), ‘Different regulatory models of transfer of industrial property rights in the Baltic States: A plea for harmonized approach,’ International Comparative Jurisprudence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2016.05.00110.1016/j.icj.2016.05.001 Search in Google Scholar

Kirwan, P.; Van der Sijde, P. & Groen, A. (2007), ‘Early-stage networking: how entrepreneurs use their social capital to establish and develop high-technology start-ups,’ in J. Ulijn, D. Drillon & F. Lasch (eds.) Entrepreneurship, Cooperation and the Firm: The Emergence and Survival of High-Technology Ventures in Europe, Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 391–414. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847207227.0002210.4337/9781847207227.00022 Search in Google Scholar

Landes, W. M. & Posner, R. A. (2003), The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q3z2pn10.2307/j.ctv1q3z2pn Search in Google Scholar

Landier, A. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurship and the stigma of failure,’ Entrepreneurship & Finance eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.85044610.2139/ssrn.850446 Search in Google Scholar

Leloux, M. & Groen, A. (2009), ‘Estimating business value of academic research outcomes: Towards a multi-dimensional approach,’ International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTTC.2009.02343210.1504/IJTTC.2009.023432 Search in Google Scholar

McConville, M. & Chui, W. (2017), Research Methods for Law, 2nd ed., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Mets, T.; Kaarna, K. & Kelli, A. (2010), ‘Intellectual property–lever or barrier to the globalization of knowledge-intensive SMEs of small country origin,’ Engineering Economics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 387–398. Search in Google Scholar

Nikulainen, T. (2008), A Historical Perspective on Patents and Industry Growth in Finland: Connections and Lags, ETLA Discussion Paper, no. 1159, Helsinki: Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos. Search in Google Scholar

Nyman-Metcalf, K.; Dutt, P. K. & Chochia, A. (2014), ‘The freedom to conduct business and the right to property: The EU technology transfer block exemption regulation and the relationship between intellectual property and competition law,’ in T. Kerikmäe (ed.) Protecting Human Rights in the EU: Controversies and Challenges of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38902-3_410.1007/978-3-642-38902-3_4 Search in Google Scholar

Palinkas, L. A.; Horwitz, S. M.; Green, C. A.; Wisdom, J. P.; Duan, N. & Hoagwood, K. (2015), ‘Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research,’ Administration and Policy in Mental Health, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y401200224193818 Search in Google Scholar

Paré, G.; Trudel, M.-C.; Jaana, M. & Kitsiou, S. (2015). ‘Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews,’ Information & Management, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.00810.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, T. (1964), The Social System, New York: The Free Press. Search in Google Scholar

Plaumann & Co. v. Commission [1963], ECJ, C-25/62, ECLI:EU:C:1963:17, 15.7.1963.10.1080/00845566.1963.10396368 Search in Google Scholar

de Rassenfosse, G. & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2009), ‘A policy insight into the R&D—patent relationship,’ Research Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.01310.1016/j.respol.2008.12.013 Search in Google Scholar

Sanso-Navarro, M. & Vera-Cabello, M. (2018), ‘The long-run relationship between R&D and regional knowledge: The case of France, Germany, Italy and Spain,’ Regional Studies, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.136047610.1080/00343404.2017.1360476 Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. (2012), ‘An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values,’ Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.111610.9707/2307-0919.1116 Search in Google Scholar

Scuola Elementare Montessori v. Commission [2018], ECJ, C-622/16 P, ECLI:EU:C:2018:873, 6.11.2018. Search in Google Scholar

Shane, S.; Locke, E. & Collins, C. (2003), ‘Entrepreneurial motivation,’ Human Resource Management Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-210.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2 Search in Google Scholar

Syndicat français de l’Express international (SFEI) and Others v. La Poste and Others [1996], ECJ, C-39/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, 11.7.1996. Search in Google Scholar

Tidd, J. & Bessant, J. (2009), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Chichester: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland [1994], ECJ, C-188/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:90, 9.3.1994. Search in Google Scholar

Van der Veen, M. & Wakkee, I. (2004), ‘Understanding the entrepreneurial process,’ in D. Watkins (ed.) ARPENT, Annual Review of Progress in Entrepreneurship Research, Brussels: European Foundation for Management Development, pp. 114–152. Search in Google Scholar

Värv, A.; Pisuke, H.; Mets, T.; Vasamäe, E. & Kelli, A. (2010), ‘Trade secrets in the intellectual property strategies of entrepreneurs: The Estonian experience,’ Review of Central and East European Law, vol. 35, pp. 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1163/157303510X1265037824047610.1163/157303510X12650378240476 Search in Google Scholar

Yitshaki, R. & Kropp, F. (2018), ‘Revisiting entrepreneurial motivation and opportunity recognition,’ in M. Brännback & A. L. Carsrud (eds.) A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurial Cognition and Intention, Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 122–141. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784716813.0001110.4337/9781784716813.00011 Search in Google Scholar

Zollner, M.; Fritsch, M. & Wyrwich, M. (2016), ‘An evaluation of German active labor market policies and its entrepreneurship promotion,’ Jena Economic Research Papers. Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, vol. 22, pp. 1–55. Search in Google Scholar

Zuckerfabrik Süderdithmarschen AG v. Hauptzollamt Itzehoe and Zuckerfabrik Soest GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Paderborn [1991], ECJ, C-143/88, ECLI:EU:C:1991:65, 21.2.1991. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo