[
Baldrick, Chris. 2015. Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acref/9780198715443.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Booker, Keith. 2012. Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction Literature. Lanham–Boulder–New York–London: Rowman and Littlefield.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Booker, Keith–Anne-Marie Thomas. 2009. The Science Fiction Handbook. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bousfield, Derek. 2014. Stylistics, speech acts and im/politeness theory. In Michael Burke (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, 118–133. London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradbury, Ray. 1951. The Last Night of the World. https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/books/a14340/ray-bradbury-last-night-of-the-world-0251/ (Last accessed: 30 January 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradbury, Ray. 1951. The last night of the world. In The Illustrated Man. https://csuclc.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/illustrated-man-by-ray-bradbury.pdf (Last accessed: 30 January 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bronwen, Thomas. 2012. Fictional Dialogue: Speech and Conversation in the Modern and Postmodern Novel. Lincoln–London: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ddr5tg
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canavan, Gerry–Eric Carl Link, eds. 2019. The Cambridge History of Science Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316694374
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chapman, Siobhan. 2014. ‘Oh, do let’s talk about something else-’: What is not said and what is implicated in Elizabeth Bowen’s The Last September. In Siobhan Chapman–Billy Clark. 2014. Pragmatic Literary Stylistics, 36–54. Basingstoke–New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137023278_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chilluva, Innocent–Esther Ajiboye. 2016. Language use in crisis situations: A discourse analysis of online reactions to digital news reports of the Washington Navy Yard shooting and the Nairobi Westgate attack. In Rotimi Taiwo–Tunde Opeibi (eds), The Discourse of Digital Civic Engagement, 35–55. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294730558_Language_Use_in_Crisis_Situations_a_discourse_analysis_of_online_reactions_to_digital_news_reports_of_the_Washington_Navy_Yard_shooting_and_the_Nairobi_Westgate_attack (Last accessed: 30 January 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coombs, Timothy–Sherry Holladay, eds. 2010. The Handbook of Crisis Communication. London: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444314885
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and Characterization. People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foley, Mark–Diane Hall. 2003. Longman Advanced Learners’ Grammar. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hubble, Nick–Aris Mousoutzanis, eds. 2014. The Science Fiction Handbook. London–Oxford–New York–New Delhi–Sydney: Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lambrou, Marina. 2014. Stylistics, conversation analysis and the cooperative principle. In Michael Burke (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, 136–154. London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, Geoffrey–Mick Short. 2007. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McIntyre, Dan. 2016. Dialogue. In Violeta Sotirova (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, 430–443. London–Oxford–New York–New Delhi–Sydney: Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyers, Walter Earl. 1980. Aliens and Linguists: Language Study and Science Fiction. Athens: University of Georgia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nørgaard, Nina–Rocío Montoro–Beatrix Busse. 2010. Key Terms in Stylistics. London: Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nykänen, Elise–Aino Koivisto. 2016. Introduction: Approaches to fictional dialogue. International Journal of Literary Linguistics 5(2): 1–14. https://journals.linguistik.de/ijll/article/view/56 (Last accessed: 17 March 2021).10.15462/ijll.v5i2.56
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, Adam. 2016. The History of Science Fiction. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-56957-8_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sassen, Claudia. 2003. An HPSG-based representation model for illocutionary acts in crisis talk. In Peter Kühnlein–Hannes Rieser–Henk Zeevat (eds), Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millenium, 43–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.114.04sas
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sellnow, Timothy–Matthew Seeger. 2013. Theorizing Crisis Communication. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Short, Mick. 1989. Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama. In Ronald Carter–Paul Simpson (eds), Language, Discourse and Literature. An Introductory Reader in Discourse Stylistics, 139–168. London–New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Short, Mick. 2014. Analysing Dialogue. In Peter Stockwell–Sara Whiteley (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, 344–359. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139237031.026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simpson, Paul. 2004. Stylistics. A Resource Book for Students. London–New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203496589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stokes, Randall–John Hewitt. 1976. Aligning actions. American Sociological Review 41: 838–849.10.2307/2094730
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toolan, Michael. 1985. Analyzing fictional dialogue. Language and Communication 5(3): 193–206.10.1016/0271-5309(85)90010-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toolan, Michael. 1987. Analysing conversation in fiction: The Christmas dinner scene in Joyce’s: “Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man”. Poetics Today 8(2): 393–416.10.2307/1773043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs–Mary Louise Pratt. 1980. Linguistics for Students of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilkinson, Sue–Celia Kitzinger. 2006. Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly 69(2): 150–182.10.1177/019027250606900203
]Search in Google Scholar