Reproducibility in the technical debt domain

[1]S. Ahmadjee, C. Mera-Gómez, R. Bahsoon, Assessing Smart Contracts Security Technical Debts, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2021, pp. 6-15. ⇒35010.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00010Search in Google Scholar

[2]A. Aldaeej, C. Seaman, From Lasagna to Spaghetti: A Decision Model to Manage Defect Debt, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2018, pp. 67-71. ⇒34810.1145/3194164.3194177Search in Google Scholar

[3]R. Alfayez, W. Alwehaibi, R. Winn, E. Venson, B. Boehm, A systematic literature review of technical debt prioritization, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt ’20), 2020, pp. 1–10. ⇒34110.1145/3387906.3388630Search in Google Scholar

[4]R. R. Alfayez, P. Behnamghader, K. Srisopha, B. Boehm, An Exploratory Study on the Influence of Developers in Technical Debt, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2018, pp. 1-10. ⇒34810.1145/3194164.3194165Search in Google Scholar

[5]S. Alhusain, Predicting Relative Thresholds for Object Oriented Metrics, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2021, pp. 55-63. ⇒35110.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00015Search in Google Scholar

[6]T. Amanatidis, N. Mittas, A. Chatzigeorgiou, A. Ampatzoglou, L. Angelis, The Developer’s Dilemma: Factors A ecting the Decision to Repay Code Debt, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2018, pp. 62-66. ⇒34810.1145/3194164.3194174Search in Google Scholar

[7]A. Ampatzoglou, A. Ampatzoglou, A. Chatzigeorgiou, P. Avgeriou, P. Abrahamsson, A. Martini, U. Zdun, K. Systa, The Perception of Technical Debt in the Embedded Systems Domain: An Industrial Case Study, 2016 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2016, pp. 9-16. ⇒34710.1109/MTD.2016.8Search in Google Scholar

[8]A. Ampatzoglou, A. Michailidis, C. Sarikyriakidis, A. Ampatzoglou, A. Chatzigeorgiou, P. Avgeriou, A Framework for Managing Interest in Technical Debt: An Industrial Validation, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2018, pp. 115-124. ⇒337, 347, 349, 35210.1145/3194164.3194175Search in Google Scholar

[9]M. F. Aniche, G. A. Oliva, M. A. Gerosa, Are the Methods in Your Data Access Objects (DAOs) in the Right Place? A Preliminary Study, Sixth International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’14), 2014, pp. 47-50. ⇒34510.1109/MTD.2014.14Search in Google Scholar

[10]P. C. Avgeriou, D. Taibi, A. Ampatzoglou, A. F. Fontana, T. Besker, A. Chatzigeorgiou, V. Lenarduzzi, A. Martini, A. Moschou, I. Pigazzini, N. Saarim¨aki, D. Sas, S. Toledo, A. Tsintzira. An Overview and Comparison of Technical Debt Measurement Tools, in IEEE Software, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 61-71, May-June 2021. ⇒336, 33810.1109/MS.2020.3024958Search in Google Scholar

[11]B. Barta, G. Manz, I. Siket, R. Ferenc, Challenges of SonarQube Plug-In Maintenance, IEEE 26th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), 2019, pp. 574-578. ⇒336, 33810.1109/SANER.2019.8667988Search in Google Scholar

[12]T. Besker, A. Martini, J. Bosch, Technical debt cripples software developer productivity: a longitudinal study on developers’ daily software development work, In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt ’18), 2018, pp. 105–114. ⇒34110.1145/3194164.3194178Search in Google Scholar

[13]J. Bohnet, J. Döllner, Monitoring code quality and development activity by software maps, In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’11), ACM, 2011, New York, NY, USA, 9–16. ⇒34110.1145/1985362.1985365Search in Google Scholar

[14]N. Brown, Y.g Cai, Y. Guo, R. Kazman, M. Kim, P. Kruchten, E. Lim, A. MacCormack, R. L. Nord, I. Ozkaya, R. Sangwan, C. Seaman, K. Sullivan, N. Zazworka, Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems, In Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research (FoSER ’10), 2010, pp. 47–52. ⇒337, 338, 341, 342, 34310.1145/1882362.1882373Search in Google Scholar

[15]R. Capilla, T. Mikkonen, C. Carrillo, F. A. Fontana, I. Pigazzini, V. Lenarduzzi, Impact of Opportunistic Reuse Practices to Technical Debt, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2021, pp. 16-25. ⇒35110.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00011Search in Google Scholar

[16]A. Chatzigeorgiou, A. Ampatzoglou, A. Ampatzoglou, T. Amanatidis, Estimating the breaking point for technical debt, 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2015, pp. 53-56. ⇒34610.1109/MTD.2015.7332625Search in Google Scholar

[17]Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Managing Technical Debt Workshops, previous editions, 2010, https://resources.sei.cmu.edu/news-events/events/techdebt/past.cfm, last visited: 2021.10.05. ⇒342, 345Search in Google Scholar

[18]Y. Crespo, A. Gonzalez-Escribano, M. Piattini, Carrot and Stick approaches revisited when managing Technical Debt in an educational context, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2021, pp. 99-108. ⇒35110.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00020Search in Google Scholar

[19]D. Cruz, A. Santana, E. Figueiredo, Detecting bad smells with machine learning algorithms: an empirical study, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt ’20), 2020, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31–40. ⇒35010.1145/3387906.3388618Search in Google Scholar

[20]W. Cunningham, The WyCash Portfolio Management System, In Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications (Addendum) (OOPSLA ’92). ACM, NY, USA, 1992, 29–30. ⇒33710.1145/157709.157715Search in Google Scholar

[21]B. Curtis, J. Sappidi, A. Szynkarski, Estimating the size, cost, and types of Technical Debt, Third International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD’12), 2012, pp. 49-53. ⇒34410.1109/MTD.2012.6226000Search in Google Scholar

[22]R. R. de Almeida, R. do Nascimento Ribeiro, C. Treude, U. Kulesza, Business-Driven Technical Debt Prioritization: An Industrial Case Study, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2021, pp. 74-83. ⇒35110.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00017Search in Google Scholar

[23]M. A. de Freitas Farias, M. G. de Mendonça Neto, A. B. d. Silva, R. O. Spínola, A Contextualized Vocabulary Model for identifying technical debt on code comments, 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2015, pp. 25-32. ⇒34610.1109/MTD.2015.7332621Search in Google Scholar

[24]J. de Groot, A. Nugroho, T. B¨ack, J. Visser, What is the value of your software?, Third International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD’12), 2012, pp. 37-44. ⇒34410.1109/MTD.2012.6225998Search in Google Scholar

[25]M. di Biase, A. Rastogi, M. Bruntink, A. van Deursen, The Delta Maintainability Model: Measuring Maintainability of Fine-Grained Code Changes, 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2019, pp. 113-122. ⇒34910.1109/TechDebt.2019.00030Search in Google Scholar

[26]D. Falessi, R. Kazman, Worst Smells and Their Worst Reasons, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2021, pp. 45-54. ⇒35110.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00014Search in Google Scholar

[27]D. Falessi, P. Kruchten, R. L. Nord, I. Ozkaya, Technical debt at the crossroads of research and practice: report on the fifth international workshop on managing technical debt, 2014, SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 39, 2, 31–33. ⇒343, 34510.1145/2579281.2579311Search in Google Scholar

[28]D. Falessi, A. Reichel, Towards an open-source tool for measuring and visualizing the interest of technical debt, 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2015, pp. 1-8. ⇒34610.1109/MTD.2015.7332618Search in Google Scholar

[29]D. Falessi, A. Voegele, Validating and prioritizing quality rules for managing technical debt: An industrial case study, 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2015, pp. 41-48. ⇒34710.1109/MTD.2015.7332623Search in Google Scholar

[30]F. A. Fontana, V. Ferme, S. Spinelli, Investigating the impact of code smells debt on quality code evaluation, Third International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD’12), 2012, pp. 15-22. ⇒34410.1109/MTD.2012.6225993Search in Google Scholar

[31]F. A. Fontana, V. Ferme, M. Zanoni, R. Roveda, Towards a prioritization of code debt: A code smell Intensity Index, 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2015, pp. 16-24. ⇒34610.1109/MTD.2015.7332620Search in Google Scholar

[32]F. A. Fontana, R. Roveda, M. Zanoni, Technical Debt Indexes Provided by Tools: A Preliminary Discussion, 2016 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2016, pp. 28-31. ⇒34710.1109/MTD.2016.11Search in Google Scholar

[33]I. Gat, J. D. Heintz, From assessment to reduction: how cutter consortium helps rein in millions of dollars in technical debt, In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’11), 2011, Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA, 24–26. ⇒34310.1145/1985362.1985368Search in Google Scholar

[34]R. Gomes, C. Siebra, G. Tonin, A. Cavalcanti, Fabio Q.B. da Silva, Andre L.M. Santos, R. Marques, An extraction method to collect data on defects and e ort evolution in a constantly modified system, In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’11), 2011, Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA, 27–30. ⇒34310.1145/1985362.1985369Search in Google Scholar

[35]I. Gri th, D. Reimanis, C. Izurieta, Z. Codabux, A. Deo, B. Williams, The Correspondence Between Software Quality Models and Technical Debt Estimation Approaches, Sixth International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’14), 2014, pp. 19-26. ⇒345Search in Google Scholar

[36]I. Khomyakov, Z. Makhmutov, R. Mirgalimova, A. Sillitti, 2019, Automated Measurement of Technical Debt: A Systematic Literature Review, In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems -Volume 2(ICEIS), 2019, pages 95-106. ⇒33810.5220/0007675900950106Search in Google Scholar

[37]J. R. Lahti, A. -P. Tuovinen, T. Mikkonen, Experiences on Managing Technical Debt with Code Smells and AntiPatterns, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2021, pp. 36-44. ⇒35110.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00013Search in Google Scholar

[38]V. Lenarduzzi, T. Besker, D. Taibi, A. Martini, F. A. Fontana, Technical Debt Prioritization: State of the Art. A Systematic Literature Review, arXiv:1904.12538. ⇒338Search in Google Scholar

[39]V. Lenarduzzi, F. Lomio, H. Huttunen, D. Taibi, Are SonarQube Rules Inducing Bugs?, IEEE 27th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), 2020, pp. 501-511. ⇒336, 33910.1109/SANER48275.2020.9054821Search in Google Scholar

[40]V. Lenarduzzi, V. Mandić, A. Katin, D. Taibi, How long do Junior Developers take to Remove Technical Debt Items?, In Proceedings of the 14th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement(ESEM ’20), 2020, Article 30, 1–6. ⇒336, 33810.1145/3382494.3422169Search in Google Scholar

[41]A. Lerina, L. Nardi, Investigating on the Impact of Software Clones on Technical Debt, 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2019, pp. 108-112. ⇒34910.1109/TechDebt.2019.00029Search in Google Scholar

[42]E. d. S. Maldonado, E. Shihab, Detecting and quantifying di erent types of self-admitted technical Debt, 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2015, pp. 9-15. ⇒34610.1109/MTD.2015.7332619Search in Google Scholar

[43]M. A. Al Mamun, C. Berger, J. Hansson, Explicating, Understanding, and Managing Technical Debt from Self-Driving Miniature Car Projects, Sixth International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’14), 2014, pp. 11-18. ⇒34610.1109/MTD.2014.15Search in Google Scholar

[44]D. Marcilio, R. Bonifácio, E. Monteiro, E. Canedo, W. Luz, G. Pinto, Are Static Analysis Violations Really Fixed? A Closer Look at Realistic Usage of Sonar-Qube, IEEE/ACM 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC), 2019, pp. 209-219. ⇒336, 33910.1109/ICPC.2019.00040Search in Google Scholar

[45]J. Y. Monteith, J. D. McGregor, Exploring software supply chains from a technical debt perspective, 4th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’13), 2013, pp. 32-38. ⇒34410.1109/MTD.2013.6608676Search in Google Scholar

[46]A. Mori, G. Vale, M. Viggiato, J. Oliveira, E. Figueiredo, E. Cirilo, P. Jamshidi, C. Kastner, Evaluating Domain-Specific Metric Thresholds: An Empirical Study, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2018, pp. 41-50. ⇒34810.1145/3194164.3194173Search in Google Scholar

[47]A. Nugroho, J. Visser, T. Kuipers, An empirical model of technical debt and interest, In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’11), 2011, Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1–8. ⇒34310.1145/1985362.1985364Search in Google Scholar

[48]E. Parodi, S. Matalonga, D. Macchi, M. Solari, Comparing technical debt in student exercises using test driven development, test last and ad hoc programming, 2016 XLII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI), 2016, pp. 1-10. ⇒336, 33810.1109/CLEI.2016.7833380Search in Google Scholar

[49]I. Pigazzini, F. A. Fontana, V. Lenarduzzi, D. Taibi, Towards microservice smells detection, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt ’20), 2020, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 92–97. ⇒35010.1145/3387906.3388625Search in Google Scholar

[50]R. Plösch, J. Br¨auer, M. Saft and C. Körner, Design Debt Prioritization: A Design Best Practice-Based Approach, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2018, pp. 95-104. ⇒34810.1145/3194164.3194172Search in Google Scholar

[51]W. W. Royce, Managing the development of large software systems, Proceedings of IEEE WESCON, 1970, pp. 1–9. ⇒337Search in Google Scholar

[52]N. Saarim¨aki, M. T. Baldassarre, V. Lenarduzzi and S. Romano, On the Accuracy of SonarQube Technical Debt Remediation Time, 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), 2019, pp. 317-324. ⇒336, 33810.1109/SEAA.2019.00055Search in Google Scholar

[53]V. Lenarduzzi, N. Saarim¨aki, D. Taibi, On the Di useness of Code Technical Debt in Java Projects of the Apache Ecosystem, 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2019, pp. 98-107. ⇒34910.1109/TechDebt.2019.00028Search in Google Scholar

[54]A. Shapochka, B. Omelayenko, Practical Technical Debt Discovery by Matching Patterns in Assessment Graph, 2016 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2016, pp. 32-35. ⇒34710.1109/MTD.2016.7Search in Google Scholar

[55]V. Singh, W. Snipes, N. A. Kraft, A Framework for Estimating Interest on Technical Debt by Monitoring Developer Activity Related to Code Comprehension, Sixth International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’14), 2014, pp. 27-30. ⇒34510.1109/MTD.2014.16Search in Google Scholar

[56]A. Sundelin, J. Gonzalez-Huerta, K. Wnuk, The hidden cost of backward compatibility: when deprecation turns into technical debt - an experience report, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt ’20), 2020, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 67–76. ⇒35010.1145/3387906.3388629Search in Google Scholar

[57]K. Szabados and A. Kovács, Technical debt of standardized test software, 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2015, pp. 57-60. ⇒34610.1109/MTD.2015.7332626Search in Google Scholar

[58]R. Szalay,Á. Sinkovics, Z. Porkoláb, The Role of Implicit Conversions in Erroneous Function Argument Swapping in C++, 20th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM), 2020, pp. 203-214. ⇒33610.1109/SCAM51674.2020.00028Search in Google Scholar

[59]J. Tan, D. Feitosa, P. Avgeriou, An empirical study on self-fixed technical debt, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt ’20), 2020, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11–20. ⇒35010.1145/3387906.3388621Search in Google Scholar

[60]A. Tornhill, Prioritize Technical Debt in Large-Scale Systems Using CodeScene, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2018, pp. 59-60. ⇒34810.1145/3194164.3194187Search in Google Scholar

[61]P. Wang, J. Yang, L. Tan, R. Kroeger, J. David Morgenthaler, Generating precise dependencies for large software, 4th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’13), 2013, pp. 47-50. ⇒34510.1109/MTD.2013.6608678Search in Google Scholar

[62]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, Prioritizing design debt investment opportunities, In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD ’11), 2011, pp. 39–42. ⇒34410.1145/1985362.1985372Search in Google Scholar

[63]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, MTD ’11: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Managing Technical Debt, 2011, ACM, New York, NY, USA. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343Search in Google Scholar

[64]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, MTD ’12: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt, 2012, IEEE Press ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 344Search in Google Scholar

[65]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, MTD ’13: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt, 2013, IEEE Press. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 344Search in Google Scholar

[66]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, MTD ’14: Proceedings of the 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt, 2014, IEEE Computer Society. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 345Search in Google Scholar

[67]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2015, IEEE Computer Society. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 346Search in Google Scholar

[68]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, 2016 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD), 2016, IEEE Computer Society. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 347Search in Google Scholar

[69]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2018, IEEE Computer Society. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 347Search in Google Scholar

[70]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2019, IEEE Computer Society. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 348Search in Google Scholar

[71]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, TechDebt ’20: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technical Debt, 2020, ACM, New York, NY, USA. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 350Search in Google Scholar

[72]N. Zazworka, C. Seaman, F. Shull, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), 2021, IEEE Computer Society. ⇒337, 338, 341, 343, 350Search in Google Scholar