A Comparative Analysis of Different Urban Spaces Using Public Space Index

1 Mehta, V. Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 19, no. 1, 2014, pp. 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698 Search in Google Scholar

2 Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Banerjee, T. Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form. Los Angeles: Univ of California Press, 1998. 382 p. Search in Google Scholar

3 Banerjee, T. The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places. Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 67, no. 1, 2001, pp. 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976352 Search in Google Scholar

4 Worpole, K., Knox, K. The Social Value of Public Spaces Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2007, pp. 59–60. Search in Google Scholar

5 Sorkin, M. Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang, 1992. 252 p. Search in Google Scholar

6 Evans, J., Evans, S. Z., Morgan, J. D., Snyder, J. A., & Abderhalden, F. P. Evaluating the quality of mid-sized city parks: a replication and extension of the Public Space Index. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 24, no. 1, 2019, pp. 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1411185 Search in Google Scholar

7 Eriawan, T., Setiawati, L. Improving the quality of urban public space through the identification of space utilization index at Imam Bonjol Park, Padang city. In: Green Process, Material, and Energy: A Sustainable Solution for Climate Change. Padang, Indonesia, 2017. p. 40018. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985514 Search in Google Scholar

8 Montgomery, J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 3, no. 1, 1998, pp. 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418 Search in Google Scholar

9 Li, J., Dang, A., Song, Y. Defining the ideal public space: A perspective from the publicness. Journal of Urban Management, vol. 11, no. 4, 2022, pp. 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.005 Search in Google Scholar

10 Jacobs, J. The death and life of great american cities. New York: Vintage Books, 1961. 241 p. Search in Google Scholar

11 Gehl, J. A changing street life in a changing society. Places, vol. 6, no. 1, 1989, pp. 8–17. Search in Google Scholar

12 Cook, R. Zoning for Downtown Urban Design : How Cities Control Development. New York: Lexington Books, 1980. 178 p. Search in Google Scholar

13 Canter, D. The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press, 1977. 198 p. Search in Google Scholar

14 Punter, J. Participation in the design of urban space. Landscape design, vol. 200, no. 1, 1991, pp. 24–27. Search in Google Scholar

15 Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T., Bosman, C., Coiacetto, E. Measuring experiential qualities of urban public spaces: users’ perspective. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 24, no. 3, 2019, pp. 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1484664 Search in Google Scholar

16 Currie, M. A. A design framework for small parks in ultra-urban, metropolitan, suburban and small town settings. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017, pp. 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1234334 Search in Google Scholar

17 Forsyth, A., Jacobson, J., Thering, K. Six Assessments of the Same Places: Comparing Views of Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 1, 2010, pp. 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903429274 Search in Google Scholar

18 Ameli, S. H., Hamidi, S., Garfinkel-CASTRO, A., Ewing, R. Do Better Urban Design Qualities Lead to More Walking in Salt Lake City, Utah? Journal of Urban Design, vol. 20, no. 3, 2015, pp. 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1041894 Search in Google Scholar

19 Talavera-Garcia, R., Soria-Lara, J. A. Q-PLOS, developing an alternative walking index. A method based on urban design quality. Cities, vol. 45, 2015, pp. 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003 Search in Google Scholar

20 Ewing, R., Handy, S. Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 14, no. 1, 2009, pp. 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155 Search in Google Scholar

21 Hooi, E., Pojani, D. Urban design quality and walkability: an audit of suburban high streets in an Australian city. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020, pp. 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1554996 Search in Google Scholar

22 De Magalhães, C. Public Space and the Contracting-out of Publicness: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 4, 2010, pp. 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502347 Search in Google Scholar

23 Varna, G., Tiesdell, S. Assessing the Publicness of Public Space:The Star Model of Publicness. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 4, 2010, pp. 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502350 Search in Google Scholar

24 Brighenti, A. The Publicness of Public Space: On the Public Domain. Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Università degli studi di Trento, 2010 [cited 20.07.2023]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11830069.pdf Search in Google Scholar

25 Madden, D. J. Revisiting the End of Public Space: Assembling the Public in an Urban Park. City & Community, vol. 9, no. 2, 2010, pp. 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2010.01321.x Search in Google Scholar

26 Karaçor, E. Public vs. Private: The Evaluation of Different Space Types in Terms of Publicness Dimension. European Journal of Sustainable Development. vol. 5, no. 3, 2016, pp. 51–58. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n3p51 Search in Google Scholar

27 Carmona, M. Contemporary Public Space, Part Two: Classification. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 2, 2010, pp. 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574801003638111 Search in Google Scholar

28 Şenik, B., Karaçor, E. Growing Istanbul And Fragmented Landscapes in The Face of Globalization. International Refereed Journal of Architecture and Design, vol. 13, 2018, pp. 24–46. https://doi.org/10.17365/TMD.2018.1.4 Search in Google Scholar

29 Demirkaya, R. Tarihi kentlerde tarihi park ve bahçelerin değerlendirilmesi ve İstanbul örneği. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, 1999 [cited 20.07.2023]. https://polen.itu.edu.tr/items/43f16cbe-3dba-4650-ab7d-4bbc899cadf8 Search in Google Scholar

30 Trancik, R. Finding lost space: theories of urban design. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991. 256 p. Search in Google Scholar

31 Gehl, J., Gemzoe, L. New city spaces. Copenhagen: The Danish Architectural Press, 2001. Search in Google Scholar

32 Erkip, F. The Shopping Mall as an Emergent Public Space in Turkey. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 35, no. 6, 2003, pp. 1073–1093. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35167 Search in Google Scholar

33 Roitman, S. Gated communities: definitions, causes and consequences. Urban Design and Planning, vol. 163, no. 1, 2010, pp. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2010.163.1.31 Search in Google Scholar

34 Caldeira, T. P. R. City of walls: crime, segregation, and citizenship in São Paulo. California: Univ of California Press, 2001. 473 p. Search in Google Scholar

35 Mitchell, D. The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. vol. 85, 1995, pp. 108–133. Search in Google Scholar

36 Madanipour, A. Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge, 2003. 276 p. Search in Google Scholar

37 Yoon, H., Srinivasan, S. Are They Well Situated? Spatial Analysis of Privately Owned Public Space, Manhattan, New York City. Urban Affairs Review, vol. 51, no. 3, 2014, pp. 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414552457 Search in Google Scholar