1. bookVolume 18 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Open Access

University-Community Engagement: Formation of New Collaboration Patterns in Participatory Budgeting Process

Published Online: 24 Dec 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 18 (2022) - Issue 1 (January 2022)
Page range: 156 - 165
Received: 02 Nov 2022
Accepted: 10 Dec 2022
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year

1. Wang, S., Xie, Z., Wu, R., Feng, K. How does urbanisation affect the carbon intensity of human well-being? A global assessment. Applied Energy, vol. 312, 2022, 118798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.11879810.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118798 Search in Google Scholar

2. Zhong, Z., Chen, Z. Urbanization, green development and residents’ happiness: The moderating role of environmental regulation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 97, 2022, 106900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.10690010.1016/j.eiar.2022.106900 Search in Google Scholar

3. Cortinovis, C., Olsson, P., Boke-Olen, N., Hedlund, K. Scaling up nature-based solutions for climate-change adaptation: Potential and benefits in three European cities. Urban forestry and Urban greening, vol. 67, 2022, 127450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.12745010.1016/j.ufug.2021.127450 Search in Google Scholar

4. Project for public spaces [online, cited 10.09.2022]. https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking Search in Google Scholar

5. Ballon, P., Van Hoed, M., Schuurman, D. The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: Measuring the impact of living labs. Telematics and Informatics, vol. 35, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1201–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.02.00310.1016/j.tele.2018.02.003 Search in Google Scholar

6. Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., Amitrano, C. C. Co-governing smart cities through living labs. top evidences from EU. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 50E, 2017, pp. 21–37. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.2017.000210.24193/tras.2017.0002 Search in Google Scholar

7. Lin, Y. A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: the application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. Telecommunications Policy, vol. 42, no. 10, 2018, pp. 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.00310.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.003 Search in Google Scholar

8. Reforgiato Recupero, D., Castronovo, M., Consoli, S., Costanzo, T., Gangemi, A., Grasso, L., Lodi, G., Merendino, G., Mongiovi, M., Presutti, V., Rapisarda, S. D., Rosa, S., Spampinato, E. An innovative, open, interoperable citizen engagement cloud platform for smart government and users’ interaction. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 7, no. 2, 2016, pp. 388–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0361-010.1007/s13132-016-0361-0 Search in Google Scholar

9. Sinkiene, J., et al. Potential for Transformation of Urban Open Public Spaces in Modernist Multi-Apartment Districts in Lithuania. Architecture and Urban planning, vol. 14, no. 1, 2018, pp. 127–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2018-001710.2478/aup-2018-0017 Search in Google Scholar

10. De Guimaraes, J.C.F., Severo, E.A., Junior, L.A.F., Batista da Costa, W.P., Salmoria, T. Governance and quality of life in smart cities: towards sustainable development goals, Journal of Cleaner production, vol. 253, 2020, 119926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11992610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119926 Search in Google Scholar

11. Zvolska, L., Lehner, M., Voytenko Palgan, Y., Mont, O., Plepys, A. Urban sharing in smart cities: The cases of Berlin and London. Local Environment, vol. 24, no. 7, 2019, pp. 628–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.146397810.1080/13549839.2018.1463978 Search in Google Scholar

12. Cabannes, Y. Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. [Presupuesto participativo: Una contribución significativa a la democracia participativa]. Environment and Urbanization, vol. 16, no. 1, 2004, pp. 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1630/09562470432302613310.1630/095624704323026133 Search in Google Scholar

13. Bassoli, M. Participatory budgeting in Italy: An analysis of (almost democratic) participatory governance arrangements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 36, no. 6, 2012, pp. 1183–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01023.x10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01023.x Search in Google Scholar

14. Laruelle, A. Voting to select projects in participatory budgeting. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 288, no. 2, 2021, pp. 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.06310.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.063 Search in Google Scholar

15. Goel, A., Krishnaswamy, A. K., Sakshuwong, S., Aitamurto, T. Knapsack voting for participatory budgeting. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, vol. 7, no. 2, 2019, article no. 8, pp. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/334023010.1145/3340230 Search in Google Scholar

16. Akmentina, L. Broadening Public Engagement in Spatial Planning through Digital Participatory Mapping: Experiences from Latvia. Architecture and Urban planning, vol. 18, no. 1, 2022, pp. 30–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2022-000410.2478/aup-2022-0004 Search in Google Scholar

17. Akmentina, L. Participatory Planning in Post-socialist Cities: A Case Study of Riga. Architecture and Urban planning, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, pp. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-000410.2478/aup-2020-0004 Search in Google Scholar

18. Geipele, S., Kundzina, A., Pudzis, E., Lazdins, A. Evaluation of Community Involvement in Participatory Process – Lessons Learned in the Baltic Sea Region. Architecture and Urban planning, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, pp. 56–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-000910.2478/aup-2020-0009 Search in Google Scholar

19. Krenjova, J., Raudla, R. Participatory budgeting at the local level: Challenges and opportunities for new democracies. Halduskultuur, vol. 14, no. 1, 2013, pp. 18–46. Search in Google Scholar

20. Kempa, J., Kozłowski, A. R. Participatory Budget as a Tool Supporting the Development of Civil Society in Poland. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, vol. 13, no. 1, 2020, pp. 61–79. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0003.10.2478/nispa-2020-0003 Search in Google Scholar

21. Fain, B., Goel, A., Munagala, K. The core of the participatory budgeting problem. In: Cai, Y., Vetta, A. (eds.), Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, vol. 10123, 2016, pp. 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54110-4_2710.1007/978-3-662-54110-4_27 Search in Google Scholar

22. Lehtonen, P. Policy on the move: the enabling settings of participation in participatory budgeting, Policy Studies, vol. 43, no. 5, 2021, pp. 1036–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2021.189598110.1080/01442872.2021.1895981 Search in Google Scholar

23. Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., Geertman, S. Smart governance for sustainable cities: Findings from a systematic literature review. Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 26, no. 4, 2019, pp. 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.165117810.1080/10630732.2019.1651178 Search in Google Scholar

24. Bardovič, J., Gašparík, J. Enablers of participatory budgeting in Slovakia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, vol. 29, no. 1, 2021, 1248. https://doi.org/10.46585/sp2901124810.46585/sp29011248 Search in Google Scholar

25. Jüptner, P., Klimovský, D. Vertical and horizontal intergovernmental relations during the first wave of the COVID-19 crisis: Experience from the extremely fragmented CEE countries. Local Government Studies, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.194485810.1080/03003930.2021.1944858 Search in Google Scholar

26. Sharifi, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of the Total Environment, vol. 749, 2020, 142391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14239110.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391 Search in Google Scholar

27. Ardito, L., Ferraris, A., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Bresciani, S., Del Giudice, M. The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 142, 2019, pp. 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.03010.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.030 Search in Google Scholar

28. Benneworth, P., Hospers, G.-J. Urban competitiveness in the knowledge economy: Universities as new planning animateurs. Progress in Planning, vol. 67, no. 2, 2007, pp. 105–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2007.02.00310.1016/j.progress.2007.02.003 Search in Google Scholar

29. Miller, K., McAdam, R., McAdam, M. A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: Toward a research agenda. R&D Management, vol. 48, no. 1, 2018, pp. 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.1222810.1111/radm.12228 Search in Google Scholar

30. Chatterton, P. The cultural role of universities in the community: revisiting the university-community debate. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 32, no. 1, 2000, pp. 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1068/a324310.1068/a3243 Search in Google Scholar

31. Benneworth, P., Jongbloed, B. W. Who matter to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, vol. 59, 2010, pp. 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9265-210.1007/s10734-009-9265-2 Search in Google Scholar

32. Bednarz, S. W., Chalkley, B., Fletcher, S., Hay, I., Le Heron, E., Mohan, A., Trafford, J. Community engagement for student learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 1, 2008, pp. 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826070173155310.1080/03098260701731553 Search in Google Scholar

33. Beecroft, R. Embedding higher education into a real-world lab: A process-oriented analysis of six transdisciplinary project courses. Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 10, 2018, 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1010379810.3390/su10103798 Search in Google Scholar

34. Raven, R., Sengers, F., Spaeth, P., Xie, L., Cheshmehzangi, A., de Jong, M. Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. European Planning Studies, vol. 27, no. 2, 2019, pp. 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.139304710.1080/09654313.2017.1393047 Search in Google Scholar

35. Koekkoek, A., van Ham, M., Kleinhans, R. Unraveling university-community engagement: a literature review. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, vol. 25, no. 1, 2021, pp. 3–24. Search in Google Scholar

36. Best practice brief, no. 32, April 2005 [online, cited 01.09.2022]. https://outreach.msu.edu/bpbriefs/issues/brief32.pdf Search in Google Scholar

37. Tijsma, G., Urias, E., Zweekhorst, M. B. M. A thematic approach to realize multidisciplinary community service-learning education to address complex societal problems: a-win-win-win situation? Frontiers in Education, vol. 5, 2021, 617380. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.61738010.3389/feduc.2020.617380 Search in Google Scholar

38. Participative Budgeting [online]. Tartu [cited 25.08.2021]. https://www.tartu.ee/en/participative-budgeting Search in Google Scholar

39. Participatory Budgeting 2020 [online]. Tampere [cit­ed 25.08.2021]. https://mun.tampere.fi/processes/os­bu2020/f/1/ Search in Google Scholar

40. Decidim: Free Open-Source Participatory Democracy for Cities and Organisations [online]. Decidim [cited 05.09.2021]. https://decidim.org Search in Google Scholar

41. Rīgas domes Izglitības, kultūras un sporta departaments. Projektu konkurss “Apkaimju iniciatīvas līdzdalības un piederības veicināšanai” (Project competition “Initiatives to promote public participation and sense of belonging in the neighbourhood”) [online, cited 25.08.2021]. https://integracija.riga.lv/lv/integracija/finansesanas-konkursi?target=184 Search in Google Scholar

42. Riga City Council City Development department started the new initiative “Multifunctional public open space development in Riga’s neighbourhoods” [online, cited 25.08.2021]. https://www.rdpad.lv/portfolio/daudzfunkcionalas-publiskas-artelpas-attistiba-rigas-pilsetas-apkaimes/?fbclid=IwAR31ey-uyJZizdKgiEMjuQEmYdNLU5rgJ4io4KlNA-O7mReNdgrx3mR8-Qw Search in Google Scholar

43. Welcome to the world’s most popular website builder, 2021 [online]. WordPress [cited 25.08.2021]. https://wordpress.com Search in Google Scholar

44. Rīgas dome, 2020. Rīgas pilsētas līdzdalīgās budžetēšanas projektu īstenošanas konkurss (Riga City participatory budgeting project implementation competition) [online, cited 25.08.2021]. https://www.riga.lv/lv/rigas-pilsetas-lidzdaligas-budzetesanas-projektu-istenosanas-konkurss Search in Google Scholar

45. Rīdzinieku iesaistes programma pilsētas attīstībai – līdzdalības budžets (Program for Riga’s inhabitants involvement in city’s development – participatory budgeting) [online]. Balso Rīga [cited 25.08.2021]. https://balso.riga.lv/ Search in Google Scholar

46. About Drupal [online]. Drupal [cited 25.08.2021]. https://www.drupal.org Search in Google Scholar

47. Barcellini, F., Prost, L., Cerf, M. Designers’ and users’ roles in participatory design: What is actually co-designed by participants? Applied Ergonomics, vol. 50, 2015, pp. 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.00510.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.005 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo