1. bookVolume 18 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2255-8764
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Shape-finding in Biophilic Architecture: Application of AI-based Tool

Published Online: 05 Nov 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 18 (2022) - Issue 1 (January 2022)
Page range: 68 - 75
Received: 27 Jun 2022
Accepted: 17 Oct 2022
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2255-8764
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English

1. Zylinska, J. AI art: machine visions and warped dreams. London: Open Humanities Press, 2020. 178 p. Search in Google Scholar

2. Wilson, E. O. Naturalist. Washington, D.C.: Shearwater Books, 1994. 380 p. Search in Google Scholar

3. Krčmářová, J. E.O. Wilson’s concept of biophilia and the environmental movement in the USA. Klaudyán: Internet J Histor Geogr Environ History, 2009, vol. 6, no. 1–2, pp. 4–17. Search in Google Scholar

4. Chang, C.-c., Cheng, G. J. Y., Nghiem, T. P.L., Song, X. P., Oh, R. R. Y., Richards, D. R., Carrasco, L. R. Social media, nature, and life satisfaction: global evidence of the biophilia hypothesis. Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60902-w Search in Google Scholar

5. Hung, S.-H., Chang, C.-Y. U sing A I t o E xtract Biophilic Design Elements and Predict Health Benefits and Tradition Environmental Qi. The University of Auckland Conference contribution 2021. https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.13578209.v2 Search in Google Scholar

6. Zhong, W., Schröder, T., Bekkering, J. Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, pp. 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006 Search in Google Scholar

7. Mollazadeh, M., Zhu, Y. Application of Virtual Environments for Biophilic Design: A Critical Review. Buildings, vol. 11, no. 4, 2021, 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040148 Search in Google Scholar

8. Wang, P.-C., Yu, C.-Y. Aesthetic experience as an essential factor to trigger positive environmental consciousness. Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 4, 2018, 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041098 Search in Google Scholar

9. Sobel, D. Beyond Ecophobia: Reclaiming the Heart of Nature Education. Great Barrington, MA: Orion Society, 1996. 61 p. Search in Google Scholar

10. Brown, K., Adger, W. N., Devine-Wright, P., Barr, S., Bousquet, F., Butler, C., Evans, L., Marshall, N., Quinn, T. Empathy, place and identity interactions for sustainability. Global Environmental Change, vol. 56, no. 6, 2019, pp. 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.003 Search in Google Scholar

11. Riekstins, A. Teaching parametricism as a standard skill for architecture. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, vol. 42, no. 1, 2018, pp. 34–39. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2018.1476 Search in Google Scholar

12. Williams, K. Form-Finding, Architecture and Mathematics. Nexus Network Journal, vol. 24, 2022, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00588-3 Search in Google Scholar

13. Goldsmith, N. S. Shape Finding or Form Finding? Proceedings of the IASS-SLTE 2014 Symposium “Shells, Membranes and Spatial Structures: Footprints” 15 to 19 September 2014, Brasilia, Brazil [online, cited 10.05.2022]. https://ftlstudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04Form%20Finding%20vs%20Shape%20Making.pdf Search in Google Scholar

14. Elshanwany, H., El-sayad, Z., Nasser, H. S. Various classifications for architectural form finding process. The Egyptian International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Technology, vol. 32, 2020, pp. 32–42.10.21608/eijest.2020.47216.1022 Search in Google Scholar

15. Cetinic, E., She, J. Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), vol. 18, no. 2, 2022, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799 Search in Google Scholar

16. Grba, D. Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art. Digital, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital2010001 Search in Google Scholar

17. Mateas, M. Expressive AI: A hybrid art and science practice. Leonardo, vol. 34, no. 2, 2001, pp. 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1162/002409401750184717 Search in Google Scholar

18. Tromble, M. Ask not what AI can do for art... but what art can do for AI. Artnodes, vol. 26, 2020, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i26.3368 Search in Google Scholar

19. Hassine, T., Neeman, Z. The Zombification of Art History: How AI resurrects dead masters, and perpetuates historical biases. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, pp. 28–35. https://doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v11i2.663 Search in Google Scholar

20. Crowson, K., Biderman, S., Kornis, D., Stander, D., Hallahan, E., Castricato, L, Raff, E. VQGAN-CLIP: Open Domain Image Generation and Editing with Natural Language Guidance. In: Avidan, S., Brostow, G., Cissé, M., Farinella, G.M., Hassner, T. (eds). Computer Vision – ECCV 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13697. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19836-6_6 Search in Google Scholar

21. Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., Mador, M. Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2011. 432 p. Search in Google Scholar

22. Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., Clancy, J. O. 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green LLC, 2014 [online, cited 10.05.2022]. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/report/14-patterns/ Search in Google Scholar

23. Kagan, S. Aesthetics of Sustainability: A Transdisciplinary Sensibility for Transformative Practices. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, vol. 2, 2011, pp. 65–73. https://doi.org/10.22545/2011/00014 Search in Google Scholar

24. Daugelaite, A., Dogan, H. A., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. Characterizing sustainability aesthetics of buildings and environments: methodological frame and pilot application to the hybrid environments. Landscape Architecture and Art, vol. 19, no. 19, 2021, pp. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2021.19.06 Search in Google Scholar

25. Salingaros, N. A. The biophilic healing index predicts effects of the built environment on our wellbeing. Journal of Biourbanism, vol. 8, no. 1, 2019, pp. 13–34. Search in Google Scholar

26. Mcgee, B. Biophilic Interior Design: The Creation and Testing of an Interior Design Specific Language. School of Human Ecology Faculty Presentations. Presentation 315, 2019 [online, cited 10.05.2022]. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ecology-facpres/315 Search in Google Scholar

27. Viliūnas, G., Daugėlaitė, A., Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, I. Integration of biophilic criteria into assessment of expression and design of sustainable architecture as healing environments. Conference: Human and nature safety 2022: selected papers, 2022, pp. 24–127. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo