1. bookVolume 18 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2255-8764
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Broadening Public Engagement in Spatial Planning through Digital Participatory Mapping: Experiences from Latvia

Published Online: 07 Jul 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 18 (2022) - Issue 1 (January 2022)
Page range: 30 - 42
Received: 24 Feb 2022
Accepted: 23 May 2022
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2255-8764
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English

1. Thie, J. Canada Geographic Information System (CGIS). In: Kemp, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. 2008, p. 19. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953962.n11 Search in Google Scholar

2. Ganapati, S. Uses of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Applications in E-Government. Public Administration Review, vol. 71, no. 3, 2011, pp. 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02226.x Search in Google Scholar

3. Brown, G., Reed, P., Raymond, C. M. Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research. Applied Geography, vol. 116, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102156 Search in Google Scholar

4. About Participatory Mapping, 2020 [online]. International Society of Participatory Mapping [cited 5.10.2021]. https://pmappingsociety.mn.co/ Search in Google Scholar

5. Brown, G., Kyttä, M. Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Applied Geography, vol. 95, 2018, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002 Search in Google Scholar

6. Pánek, J. From Mental Maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal, vol. 53, no. 4, 2016, pp. 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862 Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhang, S. Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments. Cities, vol. 85, 2019, pp. 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004 Search in Google Scholar

8. Sieber, R. Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 96, no. 3, 2006, pp. 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x Search in Google Scholar

9. Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., Tyger, T. Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process. Planning Practice & Research, vol. 31, no. 2, 2016, pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203 Search in Google Scholar

10. Bugs, G. Assessment of Online PPGIS Study Cases in Urban Planning. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A. A. C. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2012, pp. 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31125-3_36 Search in Google Scholar

11. Jankowski, P. Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 6, 2009, pp. 1966–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.028 Search in Google Scholar

12. Brown, G. G., Donovan, S. Escaping the National Forest Planning Quagmire: Using Public Participation GIS to Assess Acceptable National Forest Use. Journal of Forestry, vol. 111, no. 2, 2013, pp. 115–125. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.12-087 Search in Google Scholar

13. Kivinen, S., Vartiainen, K., Kumpula, T. People and Post- Mining Environments: PPGIS Mapping of Landscape Values, Knowledge Needs, and Future Perspectives in Northern Finland. Land, 2018, vol. 7, no. 4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040151 Search in Google Scholar

14. Farhadpour, S., Hosseinali, F. Public Participation in GIS via Mobile Applications for Crisis Management Process: a Case Study of an Earthquake, Teheran, Iran. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-4/W18, 2019, pp. 387–393. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-387-2019 Search in Google Scholar

15. Brown, G., Kyttä, M. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, vol. 46, 2014, pp. 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004 Search in Google Scholar

16. Tulloch, D. Public Participation GIS (PPGIS). In: Kemp. K. K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. 2008, pp. 352–354. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953962.n165 Search in Google Scholar

17. Kahila-Tani, M., Kyttä, M., Geertman, S. Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 186, 2019, pp. 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019 Search in Google Scholar

18. Rzeszewski, M., Kotus, J. Usability and usefulness of internet mapping platforms in participatory spatial planning. Applied Geography, vol. 103, 2019, pp. 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.01.001 Search in Google Scholar

19. Pánek, J., Pásztó, V., Burian, J., Bakule, J., Lysek, J. What is the current state of geoparticipation in Czech municipalities? GeoScape, vol. 15, no. 1, 2021, pp. 90–103. https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2021-0008 Search in Google Scholar

20. Kotus, J., Sowada, T., Rzeszewski, M., Mańkowska, P. A natomy o f P lace-Making i n t he C ontext o f t he Communication Processes: A Story of one Community and one Square in a Post-Socialist City. Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 38, no. 2, 2019, pp. 51–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0015 Search in Google Scholar

21. Lorens, P., Kamrowska-Zaluska, D. Spurring the community involvement in planning - lessons from post-socialist cities. 49th ISOCARP Congress: Frontier of planning – evolving and declining models of city planning practice, 2013, pp. 1–6. Search in Google Scholar

22. Kaczmarek, T., Wójcicki, M. Participation in Public Consultations on Spatial Planning Documents. The Case of Poznań City. Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 35, no. 2, 2016, pp. 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0016 Search in Google Scholar

23. Poljak Istenič, S., Kozina, J. Participatory Planning in a Post-socialist Urban Context: Experience from Five Cities in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Nared, J., Bole, D. (eds.) Participatory Research and Planning in Practice. The Urban book series. Springer, Cham. 2020, pp. 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28014-7_3 Search in Google Scholar

24. Golovátina-Mora, P., Zelenskaia, E., Golovatina, V., Celiński, P., Mora, R. A. The meaning of post-: Participatory urbanism in Lublin, Pilsen, and Yekaterinburg. Belgeo, no. 4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.30464 Search in Google Scholar

25. Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., Kaczmarek, T. The Use of PPGIS: Towards Reaching a Meaningful Public Participation in Spatial Planning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo- Information, vol. 10, no. 9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10090581 Search in Google Scholar

26. Stafecka, L., Frīdenberga, A., Tarasova, S. Sabiedrības līdzdalība pašvaldību attīstības plānošanas dokumentu izstrādē: Latvijas pašvaldību prakses izvērtējums, 2020 [online, cited 1.11.2021]. https://providus.lv/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Providus_Sabiedribas_lidzdaliba_pasvaldibu_planosana_2020.pdf Search in Google Scholar

27. IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, 2018 [online]. IAP2 International Federation [cited 20.08.2020]. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf Search in Google Scholar

28. Noteikumi par pašvaldību teritorijas attīstības plānošanas dokumentiem, 2014 [online, cited 17.02.2022]. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/269842 Search in Google Scholar

29. Teritorijas attīstības plānošanas likums, 2011 [online, cited 10.02.2022]. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/238807 Search in Google Scholar

30. Teritorijas attīstības plānošanas informācijas sistēma (TAPIS), 2021 [online]. Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija [cited 25.04.2021]. https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/teritorijas-attistibas-planosanas-informacijas-sistema-tapis Search in Google Scholar

31. Daugavpils novada Ģeogrāfiskās informācijas sistēmas pārlūks [online]. Daugavpils novada dome [cited 9.05.2021]. http://gis.daugavpilsnovads.lv/ Search in Google Scholar

32. Interaktīvā karte [online]. Kuldīgas attīstības aģentūra [cited 25.04.2021]. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b4116c85293746fba2b3b6b0f5ceaca2 Search in Google Scholar

33. Daugavpils pilsētas industriālo zonu 3D realitātes modelis, 2019 [online]. Daugavpils novada dome [cited 25.04.2021]. http://3dpilseta.daugavpils.lv/industr_zones/ Search in Google Scholar

34. Projekta ietvaros izveidots industriālo zonu 3D modelis, 2019 [online]. Daugavpils novada dome [cited 25.04.2021]. https://www.daugavpils.lv/pasvaldiba/aktualitates/zinas/projekta-ietvaros-izveidots-industrialo-zonu-3d-modelis Search in Google Scholar

35. Par Jūrmalas pilsētas teritorijas plānojuma grozījumu izstrādi, 2019 [online]. SIA Metrum [cited 25.04.2021]. https://metrum.lv/lv/jaunumi---publikacijas/jaunumi/?id=406 Search in Google Scholar

36. Kuldīgas vecpilsētas lokālplānojuma interaktīvā karte, 2019 [online]. SIA Metrum [cited 25.04.2021]. http://kuldiga.tergis.lv/#/lv/dashboard Search in Google Scholar

37. Interneta platforma problēmu un situācijas apzināšanai, kā arī priekšlikumu iesniegšanai projektam “Lokālplānojums Rīgas Tehniskās universitātes kompleksam Ķīpsalā kā Rīgas vēsturiskā centra un tā aizsardzības zonas teritorijas plānojuma grozījumi,” 2021 [online]. SIA Metrum [cited 25.04.2021]. http://kipsala.tergis.lv/#/lv/dashboard Search in Google Scholar

38. Priekšlikumi Kuldīgas novada teritorijas attīstības plānošanas dokumentu izstrādei, 2021 [online]. Kuldīgas novada pašvaldība [cited 02.12.2021]. https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/5a138d927c3b4fca9cbefaa241371998 Search in Google Scholar

39. Ruskule, A., Štube, M., Vinogradovs, I., Veidemane, K. Application of ArcGIS online tools for stakeholder involvement and decision support in addressing land-sea interactions: Southwestern Kurzeme case study, 2021 [online, cited 9.05.2021]. https://www.gisbaltic.eu/content/dam/distributor-restricted/gisbaltic-eu/beuc2020/beuc-pdf%60s/9-beuc-day1-anda-ruskule.pdf Search in Google Scholar

40. LAND-SEA-ACT karšu pārlūks [online]. Baltijas Vides Forums [cited 9.05.2021]. https://experience.arcgis.com/ Search in Google Scholar

41. Ziņojumu karte [online]. Jelgavas pilsētas dome [cited 9.05.2021]. https://karte.jelgava.lv/reporting Search in Google Scholar

42. Sabiedrības integrācija Rīgā, 2017 [online]. SIA „TNS Latvia” [cited 11.02.2022]. https://sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/sabiedribas_integracija_riga_2017.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo