[
1. Dale, V. H., Kline, K. L., Parish, E. S., Eichler, S. E. Engaging stake-holders to assess landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 34, 2019, pp. 1199–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00848-110.1007/s10980-019-00848-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Rasmussen, L. V., Bierbaum, R., Oldekop, J. A., Agrawal, A. Bridging the Practitioner–Researcher Divide: Indicators to Track Environmental, Economic, and Sociocultural Sustainability of Agricultural Commodity Production. Glob Environ Chang., Vol. 42, 2017, pp. 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.00110.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Musacchio L. R. Key concepts and research priorities for landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 28, 2013, pp. 995–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9909-610.1007/s10980-013-9909-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Wu, J. Landscape Sustainability Science: Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being in Changing Landscapes. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 28, 2013, pp. 999–1023.10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Gardner, L., Rogers, S., Sipes, J. L. Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Sustainable Landscapes Initiative 2020. U.S. Department of Energy: Office of Scientific and Technical Information, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2172/112895410.2172/1128954
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Thome, A. M. T., Ceryno, P. S., Scavarda, A., Remmen, A. Sustainable infrastructure: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 184, 2016, pp. 143–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.08010.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.080
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Wang, B., Liu, Zh., Mei, Yu., Li, W. Assessment of Ecosystem Service Quality and Its Correlation with Landscape Patterns in Haidian District, Beijing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16, 2019, p. 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1607124810.3390/ijerph16071248
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Moldan, B., Janouškova, S., Hak, T. How to Understand and Measure Environmental Sustainability: Indicators and Targets. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 17, 2012, pp. 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.03310.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Wang, Zh., Yang, B. Li, Sh., Binder, Ch. Economic Benefits: Metrics and Methods for Landscape Performance Assessment. Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 424, 2016, pp. 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050424.10.3390/su8050424
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Wen, B., Burley, J. B. Expert Opinion Dimensions of Rural Landscape Quality in Xiangxi, Hunan, China: Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis. Sustainability, Vol. 12, 2020, p. 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1204131610.3390/su12041316
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Mahdiraji, H. A., Arzaghi, S., Stauskis, G., Zavadskas, E. K. A hybrid fuzzy BWM-COPRAS method for analyzing key factors of sustainable architecture // Sustainability. Basel: MDPI AG. eISSN 2071-1050. Vol. 10, Issue 5, art. No. 1626, 2018. pp. 1‒26. (Special Issue: Sustainability in Construction Engineering). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051626.10.3390/su10051626
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Yang, B., Li, Sh., Binder, Ch. 2016. A Research Frontier in Landscape Architecture: Landscape Performance and Assessment of Social Benefits. Landscape Research, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2015. pp. 314‒329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.107794410.1080/01426397.2015.1077944
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Deveikienė, V. Methodological guidelines for optimizing the interaction between landscape architecture and urban planning. Landscape Architecture and Art, Vol. 12, No. 12, 2018, pp. 7‒21. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2018.12.01.10.22616/j.landarchart.2018.12.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Kuiper, J. A Checklist Approach to Evaluate the Contribution of Organic Farms to Landscape Quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, No. 77. 2000. pp. 143–156. PII: S0167-8809(99)00099-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Bengtsson, A., Hägerhäll, C., Englund, J.-E., Grahn, P. Outdoor Environments at Three Nursing Homes: Semantic Environmental Descriptions. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, Vol. 29, No. 1‒2, 2015, pp. 53‒76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2014.98786310.1080/02763893.2014.987863
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Yu, S., Yu, B., Song, W., Wu, B., Zhou, J., Huang, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, F., Mao, W. View-based Greenery: A Three-dimensional Assessment of City Buildings’ Green Visibility Using Floor Green View Index. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 152, 2016. pp. 13–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.00410.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Karaşah, B. A Visual Landscape Assessment of Forest Roads: Case of Kafkasör-Mersivan Route, Artvin. Kastamonu University. Journal of Forestry Faculty, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2017, pp. 404‒413. IFS 2016, Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.285686.10.17475/kastorman.285686
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Montero-Parejo, M. J., Garcia-Moruno, L., Reyes-Rodriguez, A. M., Hernandez-Blanco, J., Garrido-Velarde, J. Analysis of Façade Color and Cost to Improve Visual Integration of Buildings in the Rural Environment. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 3840, 2020, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093840.10.3390/su12093840
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Kavaliauskas, P. Kraštovaizdžio samprata ir planavimas. Mokomoji knyga. Vilniaus universitetas. 2011, pp. 72‒73, 129‒130. ISBN 978-609-459-004-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Solehin Fitry Rosley, M., Lamit, H., Rahman, S.R.A. Perceiving the Aesthetic Value of the Rural Landscape through Valid Indicators. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 85, 2013, pp. 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.36210.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.362
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Kuster, C., Hippolyte, J.-L., Rezgui, Y. The UDSA ontology: An Ontology to Support Real Time Urban Sustainability Assessment. Advances in Engineering Software. Vol. 140, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.10273110.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.102731
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Bassuk, N., Trowbridge, P. Creating the Urban Eden: Sustainable Landscape Establishment in Theory and Practice. Sustainability and Horticultural Education. Vol. 20 No. 3. 2010. pp. 485‒486. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.20.3.48510.21273/HORTTECH.20.3.485
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. American Society of Landscape Architects ASLA. Sustainable Sites Initiative. The Case for Sustainable Landscapes. 2009. 54 p. [online]. Sustainable Sites [cited 27.07.2020]. www.sustainablesites.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Noralizawati, M., Noriah, O., Mohd, H. A. Value of Nature in Life: Landscape Visual Quality Assessment at Rainforest Trail, Penang. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 50, 2012, pp. 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.06910.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.069
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Reformatų skveras, 2019 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. http://reformatuskveras.lt/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Lukiškių aikštė. Gedimino pr. Naujamiestis, Vilnius, 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://citify.eu/lukiskiu-aikste/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. E. Balsio skvero rekonstrukcijos projektas: su vardiniais suoliukais ir scena kultūros renginiams, 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://vilnius.lt/lt/2020/02/13/e-balsio-skvero-rekonstrukcijos-projektas-su-vardiniais-suoliukais-ir-scena-kulturos-renginiams/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Vilniaus Šiaurinės gatvės projektą žada pagaliau išjudinti: statybos – galbūt dar šiemet. 2020 [online, cited 31.07.2020]. https://www.15min.lt/gazas/naujiena/gatve/vilniaus-siaurines-gatves-projekta-zada-pagaliau-isjudinti-statybas-jau-vasara-221-1264078#_
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., Brown, T. Environmental Preference. A Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors. Environment and Behaviour. Vol. 21, No. 5, 1989, pp. 509‒530. SAGE Social Science Collections. SAGE Publications Inc.10.1177/0013916589215001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Maslow, A. H. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review. Vol. 50, 1943, pp. 370‒396.10.1037/h0054346
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. The Reformation Garden conservation project. 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://s1.15min.lt/images/photos/2018/08/09/original/vilniaus-savivaldybes-parengto-reformatu-skvero-plano-aptarimas-su-jo-kurejais-5b6c65f034d08.jpg
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Lukiškių plaza project in Vilnius City. 2018 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://www.lrt.lt/img/2016/05/12/125399-306040-756x425.jpg
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Eduardo Balsio square project in Vilnius City. 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://vilnius.lt/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Eduard_Balsio_skver2.jpg
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. The Northern Street project in Vilnius City. 2018 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://s2.15min.lt/static/cache/OTI1eDYxMCw0Nz-V4NDEyLDYxNjMwNCxvcmlnaW5hbCwsaWQ9Mzc2NDM-4NiZkYXRlPTIwMTglMkYwMyUyRjE5LDMyMzY5MDk-0MzY=/29343227_1220876294715369_7949022276257579008_n-5aafab1ee0297.jpg
]Search in Google Scholar