Evaluation of Formants of Cityscape Identity using Fractal Analysis (Kaunas Case)

1. The Athens Charter. Congress Internationaux d’Architecture moderne (CIAM) (Translated by J. Tyrwhitt, 1946), 1933, Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

2. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964) [online]. ICOMOS [cited 03.05.2017]. https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

3. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, 1972. [online]. UNESCO [cited 05.05.2017]. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

4. Towards a Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment, 2004 [online]. Commission of the European Communities [cited 03.05.2017]. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52004DC0060&-from=ENSearch in Google Scholar

5. Renewed EU Sustainable Development Strategy, 2006 [online]. Council of the European Union [cited 03.05.2017]. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2010117%202006%20INITSearch in Google Scholar

6. Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities, 2007 [online]. European Commission [cited 04.05.2017]. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/themes/urban/leipzig_charter.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

7. Osborne, B. S. Landscapes, Memory, Monuments, and Commemoration: Putting Identity in Its Place. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 2001, Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 39–77.Search in Google Scholar

8. Povilaitienė, I., Kamičaitytė-Virbašienė, J. Theoretical Premises of Cityscape Identity Evaluation. CITTA 8th Annual Conference on Planning Research: Book of proceedings, 2015, pp. 381–401.Search in Google Scholar

9. Cooper, J. Fractal Assessment of Street Level Skylines: A Possible Means of Assessing and Comparing Character. Urban Morphology, 2003, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 73‒82.Search in Google Scholar

10. Cooper, J., Oskrochi, R. Fractal Analysis of Street Vistas: A Potential Tool for Assessing Levels of Visual Variety in Everyday Street Scenes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2008, Vol. 35, pp. 349‒363. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3308110.1068/b33081Search in Google Scholar

11. Cole, M.Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998. 416 p.Search in Google Scholar

12. Zaleckis, K., Kamičaitytė-Virbašienė, J., Ramanauskas, E. Preservation of Kaunas City Identity while Planning its Urban Development. Ecological architecture 2013: Book of Abstracts, 2013, p. 32.Search in Google Scholar

13. Batty, M., Longley, P.Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press, 1994. 394 p.Search in Google Scholar

14. Salingaros, N. A.Principles of Urban Structure. Amsterdam: Techne Press, 2005. 252 p.Search in Google Scholar

15. Salingaros, N. A. The Laws of Architecture from a Physicist’s Perspective. Physics Essays, 1995, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 638–643.10.4006/1.3029208Search in Google Scholar

16. Salingaros, N. A.A Theory of Architecture. Solingen: Nikos A. Salingaros & Umbau-Verlag, 2006. 278 p.Search in Google Scholar

17. Hillier, B.Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 370 p.Search in Google Scholar

18. Zaleckis, K., Kamičaitytė-Virbašienė, J. Urbanistinių struktūrų potencialo vertinimas: Kauno centras miesto visumos kontekste [Evaluating the Potential of Urban Structures: Kaunas case]. Town Planning and Archtecture, 2011, Vol. 35, Issue 4, pp. 249‒259. https://doi.org/10.3846/tpa.2011.2610.3846/tpa.2011.26Open DOISearch in Google Scholar