[
Arı, G., & Keskin, H. K. (2021). Examining Turkish students’ views on the reading literacy tasks of PISA 2018 in terms of different variables. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2021.01.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arıcı, O., & Altıntaş, O. (2014). An investigation of the PISA 2009 reading literacy in terms of socio-economic backgrounds and receiving pre-school education “Turkey Example”. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 47(1), 423-448. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001333
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aydın, A., Selvitopu, A., & Kaya, M. (2018). Resources invested in education and PISA 2015 results: a comparative study. Elementary Education Online, 17(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466346
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baykul, Y. (2000). Measurement in Education and Psychology. Ankara: OSYM Publ.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, L., Dreher, M. J., & Guthrie, J. T. (Eds.). (2000). Engaging Young Readers: Promoting Achievement and Motivation. Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berberoğlu, G., & Kalender, I. (2005). Investigation of student achievement across years, school types, and regions: The SSE and PISA analyses. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 4(7). Retrieved from https://www.ebuline.com/pdfs/7Sayi/7_2.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Büyükatak, E. (2022). PISA 2018 Türkiye Örnekleminde okuma okuryazarlık düzeylerinin farklı veri madenciliği sınıflandırma yöntemleri ile incelenmesi (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Education Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2001). Commonality analysis: Understanding variance contributions to overall canonical correlation effects of attitude toward mathematics on geometry achievement. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 27(2), 16-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Capraro, M. R. & Capraro, M. M. (2006). Are you really going to read us a story? Learning geometry through children’s mathematics literature. Reading Psychology, 27, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710500468716
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caponera, E., Sestito, P., & Russo, P. M. (2016). The influence of reading literacy on mathematics and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.936998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cayak, S. (2021). Parents’ perceptions of school climate as a predictor of parents’ participation in their children’s education. Acta Educationis Generalis, 11(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2021-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W. Y. (2015). Classmate characteristics and student achievement in 33 countries: Classmates’ past achievement, family socioeconomic status, educational resources, and attitudes toward reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coombe, C., Vafadar, H., & Mohebbi, H. (2020). Language assessment literacy: What do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn? Language Testing in Asia, 10, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00101-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coşguner, T., & Güzeller, C. O. (2015). The factors effecting reading literacy in the programme for international students’ achievement (PISA) 2009. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 5(1), 191-206.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dadandı, P. U., Dadandı, İ., & Koca, F. (2018). PISA 2015 Türkiye sonuçlarina göre sosyoekonomik faktörler ile okuma becerileri arasindaki ilişkiler. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 7(2), 1239-1252.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Demirel, G., & Yağmur, K. (2017). An evaluation of Turkish children’s higher order thinking skills based on the international PIRLS applications standards. Journal of Language Education and Research, 3(2), 95-106. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlere/issue/30938/332468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Demirtaşlı, R. N. Ç. (2014). Measurement and evaluation in education. Ankara: Anı Publ.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doğaç, A. (2021). PISA 2018 okuma becerilerini açıklayan değişkenlerin çok düzeyli yapısal eşitlik modeli ile incelenmesi (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Education Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dong, X., & Hu, J. (2019). An exploration of impact factors influencing students’ reading literacy in Singapore with machine learning approaches. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5), 52-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p52
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ertem, H. Y. (2020). Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.14.8.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gómez, R. L., & Suárez, A. M. (2020). Do inquiry-based teaching and school climate influence science achievement and critical thinking? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00240-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Güler, E. O., & Veysikarani, D. (2022). Classification of countries based on socioeconomic indicators and PISA scores: The case of the OECD. Academic Review of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 15(3), 506-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.958903
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gülleroğlu, H. D., Demir, S. B., & Demirtaşlı, N. (2014). The prediction of Turkish students’ reading literacy skills by SES related variables for PISA 2003-2006-2009. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 47(2), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001344
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing Test Items to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. USA: Allynand Bacon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hopson, L. M., & Lee, E. (2011). Mitigating the effect of family poverty on academic and behavioral outcomes: The role of school climate in middle and high school. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2221-2229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.07.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ho, E. S. C., & Lau, K. L. (2018). Reading engagement and reading literacy performance: Effective policy and practices at home and in school. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(4), 657-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kasap, Y., Dogan, N., & Koçak, C. (2021). Determining variables that predict reading comprehension success by data mining in PISA 2018. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(4), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.959609
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koçak, G. (2022). Türkiye, Singapur, Estonya ve Kanada PISA 2018 başarılarını etkileyen değişkenlerin karşılaştırılması (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Education Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koyuncu, I., & Fırat, T. (2020). Investigating reading literacy in PISA 2018 assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lan, X., & Yu, Z. (2022). A bibliometric review study on reading literacy over fourteen years. Education Sciences, 13(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, H., & Lee, J. W. (2021). Why East Asian Students Perform Better in Mathematics than Their Peers: An Investigation Using a Machine Learning Approach. CAMA Working Paper No. 66/2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3896033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luyten, H. (2022). The global rise of online chatting and its adverse effect on reading literacy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 72, 101101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ma, L., Luo, H., & Xiao, L. (2021). Perceived teacher support, self-concept, enjoyment, and achievement in reading: A multilevel mediation model based on PISA 2018. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101947
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mavi, E. (2022). PISA-2018 Türkiye verisinde okuma becerilerini etkileyen faktörlerin çok düzeyli yapısal eşitlik modellemesiyle incelenmesi (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Education Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Memisevic, H., & Cehic, I. (2022). The importance of metacognitive strategies in reading literacy results of the PISA testing in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 21(2), 116-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/JCEP-2021-0027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muratkyzy, A. (2020). Equity and excellence in the Kazakhstani Education System: A multilevel analysis of the personal and contextual factors contributing to students’ reading literacy performance on PISA 2018 (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Kazakhistan: Nazarbayev University, Graduate School of Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2009). PISA 2018 Technical Report. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 results: Where all students can succeed - Volume II. Paris: OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Okatan, O. (2021). PISA 2018 reading success in Turkey investigation of some variables. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 60, 331-353. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.825174
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Özdemir, B., & Gelbal, S. (2014). Investigating factors that affect Turkish students’ academic success with canonical commonality analysis according to PISA 2009 results. Education and Science, 39(175). https://doi/org/10.15390/EB.2014.3025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polat, E., & Madra, A. (2018). PISA 2015 ve TIMSS 2015 ışığında Turkiye’de cinsiyete dayali basari farki. Education Reform Initiative & Aydın Doğan Foundation, 1, 18. Retrieved from https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PisaTimssBilgiNotuTR.16.02.18.rev1_.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Şengül, A. (2011). Determination variables which define Turkish students’ PISA 2009 reading literacy with CHAID analysis (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Ankara: Ankara University Institute of Education Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allynand Bacon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tan, Ş. (2014). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching. Ankara: Pegem Publ. Tavşancıl, E., Yıldırım, O., & Demir, S. B. (2019). Okumaktan zevk alma ve öğrenme stratejilerinin PISA 2009 okuma performansı üzerindeki doğrudan ve dolaylı etkilerinin incelenmesi. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(82), 169-190.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Üstün, U., Özdemir, E., Cansiz, M., & Cansiz, N. (2019). What are the factors affecting Turkish students’ science literacy? A hierarchical linear modelling study using PISA 2015 data. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35(3), 720-732.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., & Mast, F. W. (2011). Influence of mental imagery on spatial presence and enjoyment assessed in different types of media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(10), 607-612.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woessmann, L., & Fuchs, T. (2004). Computers and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School. CESIFO Working paper Series No: 1321
]Search in Google Scholar
